Personal network on the Internet: How the socially marginalized stay marginalized in personal network diversity and multiplicity

The impacts of socio-demographics on online personal network were investigated.Internet access interacted with socio-demographics on network diversity.The effects of network multiplicity on personal wellbeing differed by background.The benefits of online personal network hinged upon existing social positions. The Internet by its asynchronous and non-spatial nature may facilitate the diverse and multiple personal networks, but we hypothesize that this network affordance will be heavily influenced by one's socio-demographic positions. To test this hypothesis, we used a large survey data set of Internet users (n=3,120) and examined how users' socio-demographic positions interact with Internet access to shape the affordance of network diversity and multiplicity. We found significant interactive effects, while network diversity, as indicated by homogeneity and heterogeneity, was not directly impacted by social positions. The effects of network multiplicity on personal wellbeing also differed by socio-demographic background. We argue that, without an understanding of socio-demographic disparities, a focus on Internet affordance fails to recognize the social reproduction in the creation and the benefits of personal networks.

[1]  Bruce Bimber.  Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet 1 , 2000 .

[2]  Yuli Patrick Hsieh,et al.  Online social networking skills: The social affordances approach to digital inequality , 2012, First Monday.

[3]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Social Implications of the Internet , 2001 .

[4]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage , 2009 .

[5]  H. Bonfadelli.  The Internet and Knowledge Gaps , 2002 .

[6]  M. Hindman.  The Myth of Digital Democracy , 2008 .

[7]  Yong Jin Park,et al.  Culture, technologies and democracy: A cross-national analysis of political development , 2014, Telematics Informatics.

[8]  Ithiel de Sola Pool,et al.  Technologies of Freedom , 1983 .

[9]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society , 2005 .

[10]  Artemio Ramirez, Jr,et al.  When Online Meets Offline: The Effect of Modality Switching on Relational Communication , 2007 .

[11]  P. Howard,et al.  Days and Nights on the Internet , 2001 .

[12]  Yong Jin Park,et al.  Offline Status, Online Status , 2013 .

[13]  Karen E. Campbell,et al.  SOCIAL RESOURCES AND SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS , 1986 .

[14]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet Supports Community and Social Capital in a Wired Suburb , 2003 .

[15]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature , 2004 .

[16]  Masahiro Yamamoto,et al.  Did Social Media Really Matter? College Students' Use of Online Media and Political Decision Making in the 2008 Election , 2010 .

[17]  M. Castells.  Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1996 .

[18]  Claude S. Fischer,et al.  America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 , 1993, Business History Review.

[19]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Connecting Communities: On and Offline , 2004 .

[20]  P. J. Tichenor,et al.  Mass Media and the Knowledge Gap , 1975 .

[21]  William H. Dutton,et al.  Charting Digital Divides: Comparing Socioeconomic, Gender, Life Stage, and Rural-Urban Internet Access and Use in Five Countries , 2004 .

[22]  M. Li,et al.  Online political participation, civic talk, and media multiplexity: how Taiwanese citizens express political opinions on the Web , 2014 .

[23]  Yong Jin Park,et al.  My whole world’s in my palm! The second-level divide of teenagers’ mobile use and skill , 2015, New Media Soc..

[24]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[25]  Susan Bastani,et al.  Family comes first: Men's and women's personal networks in Tehran , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[26]  Yan Bing Zhang,et al.  Social Interactions Across Media , 2004 .

[27]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom , 2006 .

[28]  Yong Jin Park,et al.  Do men and women differ in privacy? Gendered privacy and (in)equality in the Internet , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  W. R. Neuman,et al.  The Internet and Four Dimensions of Citizenship , 2011 .

[30]  N. Lin.  SOCIAL NETWORKS AND STATUS ATTAINMENT , 1999 .

[31]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[32]  Shanyang Zhao,et al.  Do Internet Users Have More Social Ties? A Call for Differentiated Analyses of Internet Use , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  B. Wellman,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships: Personal Relationships: On and Off the Internet , 2006 .

[34]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Friends, Friendsters, and Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites , 2006, First Monday.

[35]  R. Rice,et al.  Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction , 2002 .

[36]  John P. Robinson,et al.  NEW SOCIAL SURVEY PERSPECTIVES ON THE DIGITAL DIVIDE , 2003 .