Comparison of MODTRAN5 atmospheric extinction predictions with narrowband astronomical flux observations

Improving the precision of ground-based astronomical observations is an objective of both current (e.g. PanSTARRS1) and future (e.g. Dark Energy Survey and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope) sky surveys. An important element of this effort is to determine the optical attenuation imposed by the atmosphere. We have obtained atmospheric extinction observations from narrowband photometry (typically 10 nm bandwidth) at central wavelengths of 380 nm, 488 nm, 500 nm, 585 nm, 656 nm, 675 nm and 840 nm. The passbands were selected to measure the continuum component (predominantly from Rayleigh and aerosol scattering) of atmospheric attenuation, and to avoid molecular absorption features in the atmosphere. We compare these atmospheric extinction observations with predictions from MODTRAN5, a commonly used computer model of atmospheric optical transmission. The MODTRAN5 calculations were informed by a satellite-based determination of atmospheric ozone on the night of observations. We also adjusted the MODTRAN5 predictions of Rayleigh scattering to account for the difference between the default pressure and that measured at the observatory on the night of observations. We find excellent agreement across all passbands between the pressureadjusted MODTRAN5 extinction model and the observations, within our typical extinction uncertainty of 0.013 mag/airmass, but only if we exclude any aerosol scattering component in the MODTRAN5 model. Even though this is a very limited test, with observations of a single star for a single night, the fact that we obtain excellent agreement between extinction measurements and the MODTRAN5 model, with no adjustable fit parameters, bodes well for exploiting MODTRAN5 to increase the precision of ground-based flux measurements.

[1]  John T. McGraw,et al.  Measurement Astrophysics (MAP) First Steps: A New Decade of Ground-based Photometric Precision and Accuracy , 2009 .

[2]  Nicholas B. Suntzeff,et al.  An Atlas of Spectrophotometric Landolt Standard Stars , 2005, astro-ph/0504244.

[3]  John T. McGraw,et al.  Ground-based observatory operations optimized and enhanced by direct atmospheric measurements , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[4]  Christopher W. Stubbs,et al.  Toward 1% Photometry: End-to-End Calibration of Astronomical Telescopes and Detectors , 2006, astro-ph/0604285.

[5]  E. Bertin,et al.  SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .

[6]  Christopher W. Stubbs,et al.  Toward More Precise Survey Photometry for PanSTARRS and LSST: Measuring Directly the Optical Transmission Spectrum of the Atmosphere , 2007, 0708.1364.

[7]  I. Gavignaud,et al.  Optical atmospheric extinction over Cerro Paranal , 2010, 1011.6156.

[8]  R. J. Wainscoat,et al.  THE Pan-STARRS1 PHOTOMETRIC SYSTEM , 2012, 1203.0297.

[9]  Gail P. Anderson,et al.  MODTRAN4 radiative transfer modeling for atmospheric correction , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[10]  S. F. Sanchez,et al.  The Night Sky at the Calar Alto Observatory II: The Sky at the Near-infrared , 2007, 0709.0813.

[11]  L. Parrao,et al.  THE ATMOSPHERIC EXTINCTION OF SAN PEDRO M ARTIR 1 , 2001 .

[12]  Christopher W. Stubbs,et al.  PRECISION DETERMINATION OF ATMOSPHERIC EXTINCTION AT OPTICAL AND NEAR-INFRARED WAVELENGTHS , 2010 .

[13]  M. Sullivan,et al.  SNLS3: CONSTRAINTS ON DARK ENERGY COMBINING THE SUPERNOVA LEGACY SURVEY THREE-YEAR DATA WITH OTHER PROBES , 2011, 1104.1444.

[14]  CE Cramer,et al.  Precise Measurement of Lunar Spectral Irradiance at Visible Wavelengths , 2013, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[15]  Christopher W. Stubbs,et al.  Addressing the Photometric Calibration Challenge: Explicit Determination of the Instrumental Response and Atmospheric Response Functions, and Tying it All Together , 2012, 1206.6695.