Experimental demonstration of an isotope-sensitive warhead verification technique using nuclear resonance fluorescence

Significance We present an experimental demonstration of an isotope-sensitive warhead verification protocol. The measurement is capable of detecting tampering with a warhead’s material or geometry with high statistical confidence in realistically attainable measurement times, while simultaneously protecting sensitive warhead design information. Such a protocol could enable the verifiable elimination of nuclear warheads under a future arms reduction treaty. Future nuclear arms reduction efforts will require technologies to verify that warheads slated for dismantlement are authentic without revealing any sensitive weapons design information to international inspectors. Despite several decades of research, no technology has met these requirements simultaneously. Recent work by Kemp et al. [Kemp RS, Danagoulian A, Macdonald RR, Vavrek JR (2016) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:8618–8623] has produced a novel physical cryptographic verification protocol that approaches this treaty verification problem by exploiting the isotope-specific nature of nuclear resonance fluorescence (NRF) measurements to verify the authenticity of a warhead. To protect sensitive information, the NRF signal from the warhead is convolved with that of an encryption foil that contains key warhead isotopes in amounts unknown to the inspector. The convolved spectrum from a candidate warhead is statistically compared against that from an authenticated template warhead to determine whether the candidate itself is authentic. Here we report on recent proof-of-concept warhead verification experiments conducted at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Using high-purity germanium (HPGe) detectors, we measured NRF spectra from the interrogation of proxy “genuine” and “hoax” objects by a 2.52 MeV endpoint bremsstrahlung beam. The observed differences in NRF intensities near 2.2 MeV indicate that the physical cryptographic protocol can distinguish between proxy genuine and hoax objects with high confidence in realistic measurement times.

[1]  Duncan W. MacArthur,et al.  INFORMATION BARRIERS - A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[2]  Silvio Micali,et al.  The knowledge complexity of interactive proof-systems , 1985, STOC '85.

[3]  Fons Rademakers,et al.  ROOT — An object oriented data analysis framework , 1997 .

[4]  Z. Hartwig The ADAQ framework: An integrated toolkit for data acquisition and analysis with real and simulated radiation detectors , 2016 .

[5]  R. Rosenfeld Confidence , 2007, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[6]  Leonard I. Schiff,et al.  Resonance Fluorescence of Nuclei , 1946 .

[7]  W. K. Hensley,et al.  Nuclear Resonance Fluorescence Excitations Near 2 MeV in 235U and 239Pu , 2008 .

[8]  R. Auble Nuclear data sheets for A=127 , 1972 .

[9]  Manuel Blum,et al.  Non-interactive zero-knowledge and its applications , 1988, STOC '88.

[10]  Stephen E. Korbly,et al.  Nuclear resonance fluorescence and effective Z determination applied to detection and imaging of special nuclear material, explosives, toxic substances and contraband , 2007 .

[11]  Jayson R Vavrek,et al.  Physical cryptographic verification of nuclear warheads , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  B. Quiter Nuclear Resonance Fluorescence for Nuclear Materials Assay , 2010 .

[13]  Mark Jones,et al.  Supporting Technology for Chain of Custody of Nuclear Weapons and Materials Throughout the Dismantlement and Disposition Processes , 2014 .

[14]  A. Klimenko,et al.  Nuclear resonance fluorescence measurements of high explosives , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[15]  Boaz Barak,et al.  A zero-knowledge protocol for nuclear warhead verification , 2014, Nature.

[16]  Jie Yan,et al.  Nuclear Warhead Verification: A Review of Attribute and Template Systems , 2015 .

[17]  Areg Danagoulian,et al.  Nuclear disarmament verification via resonant phenomena , 2017, Nature Communications.

[18]  A. Zilges,et al.  Investigation of nuclear structure by resonance fluorescence scattering , 1996 .

[19]  Steve Fetter,et al.  Detecting nuclear warheads , 1990 .

[20]  Robert J. Goldston,et al.  A physical zero-knowledge object-comparison system for nuclear warhead verification , 2016, Nature Communications.

[21]  F. Dyson,et al.  Verification of Dismantlement of Nuclear Warheads and Controls on Nuclear Materials , 1993 .

[22]  Sharon M. Deland,et al.  Report on a Zero-Knowledge Protocal Tabletop Exercise. , 2015 .

[23]  Christina Kluge,et al.  Data Reduction And Error Analysis For The Physical Sciences , 2016 .