Fitness of double vs. single herbicide–resistant canola

Abstract Since 1995, canola cultivars with herbicide resistance (HR) have been readily adopted by Canadian producers. Gene flow between these cultivars with different HR traits has led to the occurrence of double herbicide–resistant (2HR) volunteers. To evaluate the fitness of canola volunteers with double HR, we compared three 2HR combinations to each of their parent single-HR plants (1HR: glufosinate-R, imidazolinone-R, glyphosate-R) commercial canola lines in separate greenhouse experiments. The replacement series design included five ratios of 2HR vs. 1HR plants at a single density of 129 plants m−2 and three stress treatments: herbicide application with either glufosinate, imazethapyr, or glyphosate; competition with a wheat crop; and a control without herbicide or wheat competition. Fitness indicators included aboveground biomass at 5 and 12 to 16 wk, seed production, and reproductive allocation. The 2HR plants showed delayed reproductive growth but were generally as competitive as 1HR commercial lines. Plant biomass of 2HR canola was comparable to or greater than 1HR canola, whereas seed biomass of 2HR canola was less than that of 1HR canola in half of the cases, likely because of delayed reproductive growth and early harvesting. Glufosinate–glyphosate 2HR was the fittest combination. Herbicide application had little effect on 2HR biomass at harvest, except for imazethapyr, which reduced the biomass and seed production of 2HR plants with imidazolinone-glyphosate resistance by 30%. The latter effect could have been from the unsuspected presence of 2HR plants with only one of the two acetolactate synthase mutations conferring resistance to imidazolinones. Wheat competition reduced fitness values of both 2HR and 1HR canola similarly, but seed production was still 64% that of the controls. Overall, there was little indication of reduced fitness in 2HR canola compared with commercial 1HR varieties. Nomenclature: Canola, Brassica napus L.; wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Voyageur’, ‘AC Pollet’.

[1]  P. McVetty,et al.  Plot-to-plot, row-to-row and plant-to-plant outcrossing studies in oilseed rape , 2001 .

[2]  L. Rieseberg,et al.  A Bt TRANSGENE REDUCES HERBIVORY AND ENHANCES FECUNDITY IN WILD SUNFLOWERS , 2003 .

[3]  A. Stephenson.  Flower and Fruit Abortion: Proximate Causes and Ultimate Functions , 1981 .

[4]  Marie-Josée Simard,et al.  Synchrony of flowering between canola and wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) , 2004, Weed Science.

[5]  Christopher Preston,et al.  Pollen-Mediated Movement of Herbicide Resistance Between Commercial Canola Fields , 2002, Science.

[6]  C. N. Stewart,et al.  Transgenic Bt-producing Brassica napus: Plutella xylostella selection pressure and fitness of weedy relatives. , 2003, Environmental biosafety research.

[7]  O. Leyser,et al.  Root system architecture determines fitness in an Arabidopsis mutant in competition for immobile phosphate ions but not for nitrate ions , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  M. Crawley,et al.  Biotechnology: Transgenic crops in natural habitats , 2001, Nature.

[9]  P. Regal,et al.  Scientific principles for ecologically based risk assessment of transgenic organisms , 1994 .

[10]  L. Aarssen.  Interpretation of the evolutionary consequences of competition in plants: an experimental approach , 1985 .

[11]  S. Warwick,et al.  Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L. and its wild relatives: Brassica rapa L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O.E. Schulz , 2003, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[12]  J. Weiner,et al.  The influence of competition on plant reproduction. , 1988 .

[13]  P J Regal,et al.  The adaptive potential of genetically engineered organisms in nature. , 1988, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  Linda Hall,et al.  Pollen flow between herbicide-resistant Brassica napus is the cause of multiple-resistant B. napus volunteers1 , 2000, Weed Science.

[15]  J. Fredshavn,et al.  Growth behavior and competitive ability of transgenic crops , 1996 .

[16]  D. Shaner,et al.  Imidazolinone-tolerant crops: history, current status and future. , 2005, Pest management science.

[17]  M. Crawley,et al.  Ecology of transgenic oilseed rape in natural habitats , 1993, Nature.

[18]  A. Kumar,et al.  Isogenic analysis of glufosinate-ammonium tolerant and susceptible summer rape lines , 1998 .

[19]  G. Rakow,et al.  OUTCROSSING IN RAPE AND MUSTARD UNDER SASKATCHEWAN PRAIRIE CONDITIONS , 1987 .

[20]  C. Mallory-Smith,et al.  Ecological fitness of acetolactate synthase inhibitor–resistant and –susceptible downy brome (Bromus tectorum) biotypes , 2004, Weed Science.

[21]  Lyle F. Friesen,et al.  EVIDENCE OF CONTAMINATION OF PEDIGREED CANOLA (BRASSICA NAPUS) SEEDLOTS IN WESTERN CANADA WITH GENETICALLY ENGINEERED HERBICIDE RESISTANCE TRAITS , 2003 .

[22]  Toshihiko Sato.  Size-dependent sex allocation in hermaphroditic plants: the effects of resource pool and self-incompatibility. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  J. Connolly.  [Effects of different cropping modes on crop root growth, yield, and rhizosphere soil microbes' number]. , 1986 .

[24]  Andrew R. Watkinson,et al.  On the analysis of competition within two-species mixtures of plants , 1985 .

[25]  J. Gressel,et al.  Low intraspecific competitive fitness in a triazine-resistant, nearly nuclear-isogenic line of Brassica napus , 1985 .

[26]  M. Fuchs,et al.  Comparative fitness of a wild squash species and three generations of hybrids between wild x virus-resistant transgenic squash. , 2004, Environmental biosafety research.

[27]  M. Sanderson,et al.  Grass Species and Cultivar Effects on Establishment of Grass–White Clover Mixtures , 1999 .

[28]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Will escaped transgenes lead to ecological release? , 1994 .

[29]  C. N. Stewart,et al.  Increased fitness of transgenic insecticidal rapeseed under insect selection pressure , 1997 .

[30]  Laura Zangori,et al.  Combined effects of water, nutrient, and UV-B stress on female fitness in Brassica (Brassicaceae). , 1998, American journal of botany.

[31]  J. Connolly.  ON DIFFICULTIES WITH REPLACEMENT-SERIES METHODOLOGY IN MIXTURE EXPERIMENTS , 1986 .

[32]  Hugh J. Beckie,et al.  GENE FLOW IN COMMERCIAL FIELDS OF HERBICIDE‐RESISTANT CANOLA (BRASSICA NAPUS) , 2003 .

[33]  Maurice M. Moloney,et al.  Growth, yield and quality of canola expressing resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides , 1994 .

[34]  P. Jolliffe,et al.  Indices of plant competition , 2003 .

[35]  A. Chèvre,et al.  Fitness of backcross six of hybrids between transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[36]  L. Firbank,et al.  Community composition of phytoplankton in Fujian-Guangdong coastal upwelling region in summer and related affecting factors , 1985 .

[37]  Allison A. Snow,et al.  Costs of transgenic herbicide resistance introgressed from Brassica napus into weedy B. rapa , 1999 .

[38]  M. Wilkinson,et al.  Assessing the risks of wind pollination from fields of genetically modified Brassica napus ssp. oleifera , 1995, Euphytica.

[39]  Brian K. Harper,et al.  Green fluorescent protein as a marker for expression of a second gene in transgenic plants , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[40]  J. Bergelson,et al.  Fitness consequences of genetically engineered herbicide and antibiotic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 1997, Genetics.

[41]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  The Planned Introduction of Genetically Engineered Organisms: Ecological Considerations and Recommendations , 1989 .

[42]  W. Stiekema,et al.  Occasional loss of expression of phosphinothricin tolerance in sexual offspring of transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) , 1997, Euphytica.

[43]  Clive James,et al.  Global status of commercialized transgenic crops : 1999 , 1999 .