A constitutive relationship for mechanical hysteresis of sandstone materials

Experimental results concerning mechanical hysteresis in sandstone samples, which were obtained by means of either dynamic acousto-elastic or quasi-static techniques, are mathematically modelled assuming that the critical stress at which hysteresis is activated is not an intrinsic material property, but decreases with increasing stress rate. A macroscopic strain–stress constitutive relationship is derived from this assumption, which leads the main features characterizing mechanical hysteresis in sandstones to be recovered, at least in a qualitative sense. In particular, for sinusoidal loading used in dynamic acousto-elastic experiments, the model predicts a vanishing anelastic strain and a continuous variation of the modulus defect during the entire loading cycle. Furthermore, hysteresis is shown to disappear when the frequency of the excitation approaches the static limit. Experimental results and theoretical models concerning other Earth materials and metal alloys are also considered. Although in some case, the latter results have been acquired under dramatically different experimental conditions, they are better understood, and, for this reason, are used as reference to discuss those obtained by exploiting acousto-elasticity of sandstones. The striking difference between reference findings and results in sandstone suggests that equally strikingly different mechanisms are responsible for hysteresis in the latter material system.

[1]  Frank D. Stacey,et al.  Mechanical hysteresis in rocks at low strain amplitudes and seismic frequencies , 1974 .

[2]  I. Jackson,et al.  Dislocation Damping and Anisotropic Seismic Wave Attenuation in Earth's Upper Mantle , 2012, Science.

[3]  G. Gremaud 3.3 Dislocation - Point Defect Interactions , 2001 .

[4]  James A. TenCate,et al.  Limitations of Preisach Theory: Elastic aftereffect, congruence, and end point memory , 2009 .

[5]  I. Jackson,et al.  Grainsize-sensitive viscoelastic relaxation in olivine: Towards a robust laboratory-based model for seismological application , 2010 .

[6]  R. A. Guyer,et al.  Pump and probe waves in dynamic acousto-elasticity: Comprehensive description and comparison with nonlinear elastic theories , 2013 .

[7]  Coagulation Kinetics,et al.  INFLUENCE OF STRAIN-RATE ON , 1998 .

[8]  P. Johnson,et al.  Revealing highly complex elastic nonlinear (anelastic) behavior of Earth materials applying a new probe: Dynamic acoustoelastic testing , 2012 .

[9]  Smith,et al.  Universal slow dynamics in granular solids , 2000, Physical review letters.

[10]  Lev A. Ostrovsky,et al.  Dynamic nonlinear elasticity in geomaterials , 2001 .

[11]  S. Callé,et al.  Dynamic acoustoelastic testing of weakly pre-loaded unconsolidated water-saturated glass beads. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  A. Podio,et al.  Nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of sedimentary rocks; Part II, Hysteresis effects and influence of type of fluid on elastic moduli , 1998 .

[13]  I. Jackson,et al.  Seismic-frequency laboratory measurements of shear mode viscoelasticity in crustal rocks I: competition between cracking and plastic flow in thermally cycled Carrara marble , 1996 .

[14]  P. Johnson,et al.  A set of measures for the systematic classification of the nonlinear elastic behavior of disparate rocks , 2015 .

[15]  S. Karato Deformation of Earth Materials: Contents , 2008 .

[16]  K. V. D. Abeele,et al.  Friction in unconforming grain contacts as a mechanism for tensorial stress–strain hysteresis , 2007 .

[17]  Paul A. Johnson,et al.  Nonlinear Mesoscopic Elasticity , 2009 .

[18]  Robert W. Zimmerman,et al.  Sliding crack model for nonlinearity and hysteresis in the uniaxial stress-strain curve of rock , 2012 .

[19]  Guillaume Renaud,et al.  Hysteretic nonlinear elasticity of Berea sandstone at low‐vibrational strain revealed by dynamic acousto‐elastic testing , 2013 .

[20]  C. Pecorari Modeling the elasto-acoustic hysteretic nonlinearity of dry Berea sandstone , 2015 .