Transformational Leadership and Dimensions of Creativity: Motivating Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups

Prior research suggests that both transformational leadership and anonymity may affect creativity in groups using group decision support systems to generate ideas. A laboratory study examined effects of high and low levels of transformational leadership on group creativity under anonymous and identified electronic brainstorming conditions. Four measures of group creativity were used: fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration (Torrance, 1965). Results indicated that groups working under higher levels of transformational leadership generated more idea elaborations and original solutions than groups working under lower levels of transformational leadership. Anonymous groups were more flexible in generating ideas than identified groups. Results also indicated a significant Leadership Style x Anonymity interaction for flexibility.

[1]  K. Smith.  Cooperative learning: Making “groupwork” work , 1996 .

[2]  John J. Sosik,et al.  An Affair of the Heart: Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership , 1996 .

[3]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. , 1996 .

[4]  L. Atwater,et al.  The Transformational and Transactional Leadership of Men and Women , 1996 .

[5]  Joseph Kasof,et al.  Explaining Creativity: The Attributional Perspective , 1995 .

[6]  Sherry K. Schneider,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL INFORMATION: STATUS SALIENCE AND STATUS DIFFERENCES , 1995 .

[7]  Daniel J. Brass.  Creativity: It's all in Your Social Network , 1995 .

[8]  Cameron M. Ford.  Creativity is a Mystery: Clues from the Investigators' Notebooks , 1995 .

[9]  Erik L. Westby,et al.  Creativity: Asset or Burden in the Classroom? , 1995 .

[10]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: An Empirical Evaluation , 1994, MIS Q..

[11]  J. Valacich,et al.  Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story , 1994 .

[12]  J. McGrath.  Groups interacting with technology: the complex and dynamic fit of group, task, technology, and time , 1992, CSCW '92.

[13]  Nancy A. Fontenot.  Effects of Training in Creativity and Creative Problem Finding upon Business People , 1993 .

[14]  M. Arthur,et al.  The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory , 1993 .

[15]  B. Bass,et al.  Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership , 1993 .

[16]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  Employee Propensity to Withhold Effort: A Conceptual Model to Intersect Three Avenues of Research , 1993 .

[17]  William McKinley,et al.  Organizational Decline and Adaptation: Theoretical Controversies , 1993 .

[18]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance , 1993 .

[19]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information technology for negotiating groups: generating options for mutual gain , 1991 .

[20]  K. S. Raman,et al.  The Effect of GDSS and Elected Leadership on Small Group Meetings , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Leonard Michael Jessup,et al.  Decision Making in an Automated Environment: The Effects of Anonymity and Proximity with a Group Decision Support System* , 1991 .

[22]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[23]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[24]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Within you, without you: The social psychology of creativity, and beyond. , 1990 .

[25]  T. Amabile,et al.  Social Influences on Creativity: Evaluation, Coaction, and Surveillance , 1990 .

[26]  E. Torrance.  The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. , 1988 .

[27]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[28]  S. Harkins,et al.  Effects of personal involvement: Thought-provoking implications for social loafing. , 1986 .

[29]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[30]  T. M. Amabile,et al.  Social influences on creativity: the effects of contracted-for reward. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  B. Bass.  LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 1985 .

[32]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[33]  T. M. Amabile.  The social psychology of creativity , 1984 .

[34]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Assessing the Further Reaches of Creative Potential , 1980 .

[35]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[36]  Larry L. Cummings,et al.  Creative Behavior as a Function of Task Environment: Impact of Objectives, Procedures, and Controls , 1975 .

[37]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.