Assessing the Pedagogical Effectiveness and Conversational Appropriateness in Three Versions of AutoTutor
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Peter W. Foltz,et al. Latent semantic analysis for text-based research , 1996 .
[2] Joseph P. Magliano,et al. Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring , 1995 .
[3] Kurt VanLehn,et al. STEPS: a simulated, tutorable physics student , 1995 .
[4] Arthur C. Graesser,et al. The Foundations and Architecture of Autotutor , 1998, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
[5] Shigeo Abe,et al. Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems , 1996, Springer US.
[6] Ralph T. Putnam. Structuring and Adjusting Content for Students: A Study of Live and Simulated Tutoring of Addition , 1987 .
[7] A. Graesser,et al. Question Asking During Tutoring , 1994 .
[8] Arthur C. Graesser,et al. Using Latent Semantic Analysis to Evaluate the Contributions of Students in AutoTutor , 2000, Interact. Learn. Environ..
[9] C. Stasz,et al. Tutoring Techniques in Algebra , 1990 .
[10] Arthur C. Graesser,et al. Simulating Human Tutor Dialog Moves in AutoTutor , 2001 .
[11] Kurt VanLehn,et al. Applications of simulated students: an exploration , 1994 .
[12] Arthur C. Graesser,et al. Designing AutoTutor to be an Effective Conversational Partner , 2000 .
[13] Arthur C. Graesser,et al. Simulating Smooth Tutorial Dialogue with Pedagogical Value , 1998, FLAIRS.
[14] A. Graesser,et al. Improving an intelligent tutor ’ s comprehension of students with Latent Semantic Analysis ∗ , 1999 .