论文信息 - Specification under Discussion

Specification under Discussion

1 The idea of examining specificational clauses in the Question under Discussion framework was suggested to me by Judith Aissen. The audiences at BLS 34 and the Berkeley Syntax and Semantics Circle provided much useful feedback, though space limitations prevent me from incorporating most of that here. Finally I thank Nick Fleisher, Russell Lee-Goldman and Maziar Toosarvandani for helpful comments on a pre-final draft.

Line Mikkelsen | Line Mikkelsen

[1] Katarzyna Dziwirek,et al. Copula Inversion Puzzles in English and Russian , 2005 .

[2] J. Pierrehumbert. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation , 1987 .

[3] C. Fillmore,et al. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction , 1999 .

[4] Ray Jackendoff,et al. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[5] M. A. Yadugiri. Some pragmatic implications of the use of yes and no in response to yes-no questions , 1986 .

[6] Daniel Büring,et al. On D-Trees, Beans, And B-Accents , 2003 .

[7] Adrian Akmajian,et al. Aspects of the grammar of focus in English , 1979 .

[8] J. Searle,et al. Speech act theory and pragmatics , 1980 .

[9] Caroline Heycock,et al. Topic, Focus, and Syntactic Representa- tions , 2002 .

[10] Line Mikkelsen. Copular Clauses: Specification, predication and equation , 2005 .

[11] Dieter Wunderlich. Questions about Questions , 1981 .

[12] Ferenc Kiefer,et al. Yes-No Questions as Wh-Questions , 1980 .

[13] A. Kroch,et al. Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface Level , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[14] Line Mikkelsen,et al. On so-called truncated clefts , 2007 .