Patient Registries in Cognitive Neuroscience Research: Advantages, Challenges, and Practical Advice

Neuropsychological work is the historical foundation of cognitive neuroscience and continues to be an important method in the study of the neural basis of human behavior, complementing newer techniques for investigating brain structure-function relationships in human subjects. Recent advances in neuroimaging, statistics and information management provide powerful tools to support neuropsychological research. At the same time, changing ethical requirements and privacy concerns impose increasingly high standards on the procedures used to recruit research participants, and on subsequent data management. Shared, centrally managed research registries provide a framework for facilitating access to this method for nonclinicians, addressing ethical concerns, streamlining recruitment and screening procedures, and coordinating subsequent research contacts and data storage. We report the experience of two such registries: the patient database of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of Pennsylvania, and the Cognitive Neuroscience Research Registry at McGill University.

[1]  Richard J. Brown Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .

[2]  M. Farah Neuropsychological inference with an interactive brain: A critique of the "locality" assumption. , 1994 .

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[4]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[5]  E. Bates,et al.  Quantifying Dissociations in Neuropsychological Research , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[6]  F. Dick,et al.  Voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  G. Reaman Pediatric Cancer Research From Past Successes Through Collaboration to Future Transdisciplinary Research , 2004, Journal of pediatric oncology nursing : official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses.

[8]  H. Karnath,et al.  Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Lesley K. Fellows,et al.  Method Matters: An Empirical Study of Impact in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  A Madness to the Methods in Cognitive Neuroscience? , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  John Whyte,et al.  A patient registry for cognitive rehabilitation research: a strategy for balancing patients' privacy rights with researchers' need for access. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  T. Shallice,et al.  Multiple frontal systems controlling response speed , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Keith R. Laws,et al.  Testing for a deficit in single-case studies: Effects of departures from normality , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Daniel Y. Kimberg,et al.  Power in Voxel-based Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Argye E. Hillis,et al.  Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in the study of language , 2007, Brain and Language.

[16]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Improving Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  The Neural Basis for Spatial Relations , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.