Hollywood versus the Internet: the media and entertainment industries in a digital and networked economy

The behaviour of oligopolistic firms is a source of considerable debate and concern, given their market power and ability to shape the development of new markets. A key area of debate concerns the scope for strategic adaptation in oligopolies; and in particular, the extent to which such large and otherwise successful firms ignore or marginalize important shifts in the marketplace. In this article, I critically evaluate these general theoretical issues through the lens of a specific, geographically bounded case study: the collision between Hollywood, a mature oligopoly comprising six studios, and the Internet, a decentralized architecture that has made possible peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing between networked computers. I argue that in a secure form (enforced by 'digital rights management' software), file sharing has considerable promise for all copyright owners, including the studios. I examine the oligopolistic behaviour of the studios in response to the Internet, and in particular, their response to an alternative mode of peer-based film distribution, oriented around legal, paid-for file sharing. I argue that the studios are trying to preserve the oligopolistic structure of the industry in a digital age by promoting an inefficient and restrictive 'design' for Internet distribution, oriented around centralized server-client architectures, which provides tight control over digital commodities and minimizes the disruptive impact of the Internet. This behaviour must be understood in light of the social and economic incentives that influence executives, as well as the context in which decision-making takes place. Nonetheless, their response also raises some worrying questions about the future shape of creativity, distribution and consumption in the film industry (and in the broader realm of media and entertainment) in a digital and networked economy. The article is based on over 150 interviews with elites in the studios and other related firms in the Los Angeles region. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

[1]  G. Stigler A Theory of Oligopoly , 1964, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[3]  D. Hermann Anti-Trust Law , 1974 .

[4]  M. Porter,et al.  Market Structure, Oligopoly, and Stability of Market Shares , 1978 .

[5]  Ben H. Bagdikian,et al.  The new media monopoly , 1983 .

[6]  Michael Storper,et al.  The City as Studio; The World as Back Lot: The Impact of Vertical Disintegration on the Location of the Motion Picture Industry , 1986 .

[7]  Kathleen Fischer Promises to Keep , 1992 .

[8]  Gordon L. Clark,et al.  Strategy and Structure: Corporate Restructuring and the Scope and Characteristics of Sunk Costs , 1994 .

[9]  J. Avery,et al.  The long tail. , 1995, Journal of the Tennessee Medical Association.

[10]  G. Clark,et al.  Sunk costs: a framework for economic geography , 1995 .

[11]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[12]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[13]  K. Pelc Managing strategic innovation and change: A collection of readings , 1997 .

[14]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[15]  E. Schoenberger The cultural crisis of the firm , 1997 .

[16]  Thomas Streeter,et al.  Copyrighting Culture: The Political Economy of Intellectual Property , 1997 .

[17]  Richard Barbrook,et al.  The Hi-Tech Gift Economy , 1998, First Monday.

[18]  M. Heller,et al.  The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets , 1998 .

[19]  Kathryn Graziano The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail , 1998 .

[20]  A. Markusen Fuzzy Concepts, Scanty Evidence, Policy Distance: The Case for Rigour and Policy Relevance in Critical Regional Studies , 1999 .

[21]  Mark Fischetti,et al.  Weaving the web - the original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web by its inventor , 1999 .

[22]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 1999 .

[23]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change , 2000 .

[24]  Benjamin M. Compaine,et al.  Who Owns the Media? : Competition and Concentration in the Mass Media industry , 2000 .

[25]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  Book Review , 2001 .

[26]  STRUCTURAL FOUNDATIONS FOR E-COMMERCE ADOPTION: A COMPARATIVE ORGANIZATION OF RETAIL TRADE BETWEEN JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES , 2001 .

[27]  A. Leyshon Time–Space (and Digital) Compression: Software Formats, Musical Networks, and the Reorganisation of the Music Industry , 2001 .

[28]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.

[29]  Neil M. Coe,et al.  A Hybrid Agglomeration? The Development of a Satellite-Marshallian Industrial District in Vancouver's Film Industry , 2001 .

[30]  Neil Wrigley,et al.  Retailing and E-Tailing , 2002 .

[31]  A. Scott A new map of Hollywood: the production and distribution of American motion pictures , 2002 .

[32]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  The future of ideas - the fate of the commons in a connected world , 2002 .

[33]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Firm Survival and the Evolution of Oligopoly , 2002 .

[34]  David Bollier,et al.  Silent Theft: The Private Plunder of Our Common Wealth , 2002 .

[35]  Dwayne K. Buttler Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity (review) , 2003 .

[36]  A. Currah,et al.  Digital effects in the spatial economy of film: towards a research agenda , 2003 .

[37]  Pamela Samuelson,et al.  DRM {and, or, vs.} the law , 2003, CACM.

[38]  D. Freedman Managing pirate culture: Corporate responses to peer‐to‐peer networking , 2003 .

[39]  Susan K. Sell Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights , 2003 .

[40]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography , 2003 .

[41]  James Boyle,et al.  The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain , 2003 .

[42]  A. Leyshon Scary Monsters? Software Formats, Peer-to-Peer Networks, and the Spectre of the Gift , 2003 .

[43]  A. Scott Hollywood and the world: the geography of motion-picture distribution and marketing , 2004 .

[44]  Andrew Leyshon,et al.  Putting e-commerce in its place : Reflections on the impact of the internet on the cultural industries , 2004 .

[45]  J. Copley,et al.  Oceanography: All wired up , 2004, Nature.

[46]  Edward Lenert,et al.  A social shaping perspective on the development of the world wide web , 2004, New Media Soc..

[47]  Martina Gillen,et al.  Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How it Threatens Creativity , 2004, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[48]  Ian Condry Cultures of Music Piracy , 2004 .

[49]  Paul Ganley,et al.  Digital Copyright and the New Creative Dynamics , 2004, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[50]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity , 2004 .

[51]  Y. Benkler 'Sharing Nicely': On Shareable Goods and the Emergence of Sharing as a Modality of Economic Production , 2004 .

[52]  A. Scott,et al.  Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture , 2004 .

[53]  Charles C. Moul A Concise Handbook of Movie Industry Economics , 2005 .

[54]  N. Thrift,et al.  On the reproduction of the musical economy after the Internet , 2005 .

[55]  D. Bollier Brand Name Bullies: The Quest to Own and Control Culture , 2005 .

[56]  A Concise Handbook of Movie Industry Economics: Movie Industry Accounting , 2005 .

[57]  Peter Davis On Hollywood: The Place, the Industry , 2005 .

[58]  Edward Jay Epstein,et al.  The Big Picture: The New Logic of Money and Power in Hollywood , 2005 .

[59]  J. D. Lasica Darknet: La Guerra Contra La Generacion Digital Y El Futuro De Los Medios Audiovisuales / Hollywood and the War Against the Digital Generation (A Debate) , 2006 .

[60]  A. THE TRAGEDY OF THE ANTICOMMONS : PROPERTY IN THE TRANSITION FROM MARX TO MARKETS , 2007 .

[61]  M. Danson Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies , 2007 .

[62]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[63]  William W. Fisher Promises to Keep: Technology, Law, and the Future of Entertainment , 2007 .

[64]  Felix Oberholzer-Gee,et al.  The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales: An Empirical Analysis , 2007, Journal of Political Economy.

[65]  Creating the Corporate World: Strategy and Culture, Time and Space , 2008 .