Are Studies of Dark Side Variables Confounded by Socially Desirable Responding? The Case of Materialism

Socially desirable responding (SDR) is the tendency of individuals to make themselves look good according to current cultural norms when answering researchers' questions. For over 50 years in the social sciences, SDR has been a complex and controversial issue, typically viewed as a contaminating response bias. Meanwhile, most consumer researchers have neglected SDR, including those studying sensitive "dark side" topics where SDR could have an especially detrimental impact on research conclusions. This article reviews conceptual, measurement, and statistical analysis issues related to SDR. Two surveys are then reported that explore the effect of SDR on testing propositions about the nomological network surrounding the materialism value. Implications and recommendations are discussed for investigating SDR in consumer research, including opportunities for future contributions. Copyright 1996 by the University of Chicago.

[1]  Marsha L. Richins.  Special Possessions and the Expression of Material Values , 1994 .

[2]  J. B. Kernan,et al.  Socially Desirable Responses in the Measurement of Need For Cognition , 1994 .

[3]  R. Fisher.  Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning , 1993 .

[4]  Ronald J. Faber,et al.  A Clinical Screener for Compulsive Buying , 1992 .

[5]  David Brinberg,et al.  Hypothesized and Confounded Explanations in Theory Tests: A Bayesian Analysis , 1992 .

[6]  R. H. Moorman,et al.  A meta‐analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour research , 1992 .

[7]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[8]  A. Borgmann.  Crossing the postmodern divide , 1992 .

[9]  D. Paulhus.  Measurement and control of response bias. , 1991 .

[10]  R. Ballard,et al.  Social Desirability Response Bias and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale , 1988 .

[11]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[12]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement , 1988 .

[13]  Dennis W. Rook.  The Buying Impulse , 1987 .

[14]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Using Consumer Perceptions and a Contingency Approach to Improve Health Care Delivery , 1987 .

[15]  D. Mick,et al.  Consumer Research and Semiotics: Exploring the Morphology of Signs, Symbols, and Significance , 1986 .

[16]  Alvin Jones,et al.  Validation of a Short Index of Self-Actualization , 1986 .

[17]  Delroy L. Paulhus,et al.  Self-Deception and Impression Management in Test Responses , 1986 .

[18]  H. J. Arnold,et al.  The Role of Social-Desirability Response Bias in Turnover Research , 1985 .

[19]  R. Belk.  Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World , 1985 .

[20]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual Versus Verbal Information Processing , 1985 .

[21]  D. Watson,et al.  Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Fred Luthans,et al.  Social Desirability Response Effects: Three Alternative Models , 1983 .

[23]  R. Belk.  Worldly Possessions: Issues and Criticisms , 1983 .

[24]  H. J. Arnold.  Moderator variables: A clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues , 1982 .

[25]  H. Sackeim,et al.  Self-deception, other-deception, and self-reported psychopathology. , 1979, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[26]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Implicit theories of performance as artifacts in survey research: A replication and extension☆ , 1978 .

[27]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Moderator Research and the Law of Small Numbers. , 1978 .

[28]  R. Kilmann,et al.  The Social Desirability Variable in Organizational Research: An Alternative Explanation for Reported Findings , 1975 .

[29]  H. Eysenck,et al.  Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire , 1975 .

[30]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Personality and Prediction: Principles of Personality Assessment , 1973 .

[31]  S. Ward,et al.  Family and Media Influences On Adolescent Consumer Learning , 1971 .

[32]  M. Rosenberg.  Society and the adolescent self-image , 1966 .

[33]  A. Maslow.  Toward a Psychology of Being , 1962 .

[34]  Samuel Messick,et al.  Dimensions of social desirability. , 1960 .

[35]  D. Marlowe,et al.  A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. , 1960, Journal of consulting psychology.

[36]  A. L. Edwards.  The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research , 1958 .