Spatial and Temporal Influences on Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli on The Arm

Body-machine interfaces (BMIs) provide a non-invasive way to use and control external devices such as powered wheelchairs. Vibrotactile stimulation has been proposed as a way for BMIs to provide device performance feedback to the user, thereby reducing visual demands of closed-loop control. To advance the goal of developing a compact, multivariate vibrotactile display for BMIs, we performed two 2-alternative, forced choice experiments to determine the extent to which vibrotactile perception might vary across multiple stimulation sites. The first experiment assessed vibrotactile discrimination of sequentially presented stimuli within each of four dermatomes of the arm (C5, C7, C8, T1) and on the ulnar head. The second compared discrimination when pairs of vibrotactile stimuli were presented simultaneously vs. sequentially both within and across dermatomes. Although the first experiment found small but statistically significant differences across dermatomes C7 and T1, discrimination thresholds at the other three locations did not differ one from another or from those at either C7 or T1. These results suggest that stimuli applied to each of the sites may be able to convey approximately the same amount of information. The second experiment found that sequential delivery of vibrotactile stimuli resulted in better discrimination than simultaneous delivery, independent of whether the pairs were located within the same dermatome or across dermatomes. Taken together, our results suggest that the arm may be a viable site to transfer multivariate information via vibrotactile feedback for body-machine interfaces. However, user training may be needed to overcome the perceptual disadvantage of simultaneous vs. sequentially-presented stimuli.

[1]  B. Berglund,et al.  Temporal Integration of Vibrotactile Stimulation , 1967, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  C. Hunt,et al.  The Pacinian Corpuscle , 1974 .

[3]  S. Lalwani,et al.  Spinal cord injury. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[4]  J. Wallis,et al.  The Role of Prefrontal Cortex in Working Memory: A Mini Review , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[5]  K H Sienko,et al.  Effects of multi-directional vibrotactile feedback on vestibular-deficient postural performance during continuous multi-directional support surface perturbations. , 2009, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[6]  Kathleen H Sienko,et al.  The effects of actuator selection on non-volitional postural responses to torso-based vibrotactile stimulation , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[7]  Todd D. Murphey,et al.  Augmenting sensorimotor control using “goal-aware” vibrotactile stimulation during reaching and manipulation behaviors , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Peter H Veltink,et al.  Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users , 2015, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[9]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Transient Storage of a Tactile Memory Trace in Primary Somatosensory Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Cara E. Stepp,et al.  Multi-day training with vibrotactile feedback for virtual object manipulation , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[11]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Vibrotactile stimulation of the upper leg: Effects of location, stimulation method and habituation , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  F. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: computational demands and clinical needs meet basic neuroscience , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Vibrotactile Feedback for Brain-Computer Interface Operation , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[14]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  The somatotopic organization of cytoarchitectonic areas on the human parietal operculum. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  M. Griffin,et al.  Vibrotactile thresholds at the fingertip, volar forearm, large toe, and heel , 2008, Somatosensory & motor research.

[17]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[18]  R L Sainburg,et al.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  A. A. Collins,et al.  Vibrotactile localization on the arm: Effects of place, space, and age , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Nicoletta Risi,et al.  Supplemental vibrotactile feedback of real-time limb position enhances precision of goal-directed reaching , 2018, bioRxiv.

[21]  M. Rowe,et al.  Perceived pitch of vibrotactile stimuli: effects of vibration amplitude, and implications for vibration frequency coding. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Short term memory for tactile stimuli , 2008, Brain Research.

[23]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[24]  P. Bach-y-Rita SENSORY PLASTICITY , 1967, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[25]  J. F. Dammann,et al.  The Effect of Surface Wave Propagation on Neural Responses to Vibration in Primate Glabrous Skin , 2012, PloS one.

[26]  E. Francisco,et al.  Vibrotactile amplitude discrimination capacity parallels magnitude changes in somatosensory cortex and follows Weber’s Law , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Valay A. Shah,et al.  Supplemental vibrotactile feedback control of stabilization and reaching actions of the arm using limb state and position error encodings , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[28]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Proprioceptive Localization of the Hand Changes When Skin Stretch around the Elbow Is Manipulated , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[29]  R T Verrillo,et al.  Age related changes in the sensitivity to vibration. , 1980, Journal of gerontology.

[30]  G. Werner,et al.  Topology of the body representation in somatosensory area I of primates. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Yili Liu,et al.  Queuing network modeling of the psychological refractory period (PRP). , 2008, Psychological review.

[32]  M. Stringer,et al.  An evidence‐based approach to human dermatomes , 2008, Clinical anatomy.

[33]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Differential Attention-Dependent Response Modulation across Cell Classes in Macaque Visual Area V4 , 2007, Neuron.

[34]  Ashley R. Morgan,et al.  A cognitive training intervention improves modality-specific attention in a randomized controlled trial of healthy older adults , 2011, Neurobiology of Aging.

[35]  Kathleen H Sienko,et al.  Postural Reorganization Induced by Torso Cutaneous Covibration , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  W. Penfield,et al.  SOMATIC MOTOR AND SENSORY REPRESENTATION IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF MAN AS STUDIED BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION , 1937 .

[37]  C. E. Chapman,et al.  Perception of vibrotactile stimuli during motor activity in human subjects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  The Body-Machine Interface: A New Perspective on an Old Theme , 2012, Journal of motor behavior.

[39]  Seungmoon Choi,et al.  Vibrotactile Display: Perception, Technology, and Applications , 2013, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[40]  C. Spence,et al.  The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  C. Curtis,et al.  Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Seungmoon Choi,et al.  Vibrotactile Perceived Intensity for Mobile Devices as a Function of Direction, Amplitude, and Frequency , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[43]  R. T. Verrillo Psychophysics of vibrotactile stimulation. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  K. H. Sienkoa Effects of multi-directional vibrotactile feedback on vestibular-deficient postural performance during continuous multi-directional support surface perturbations , 2015 .

[46]  Conrad Wall,et al.  Balance prosthesis based on micromechanical sensors using vibrotactile feedback of tilt , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[47]  Louise Connell,et al.  When does perception facilitate or interfere with conceptual processing? The effect of attentional modulation , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[48]  R. Romo,et al.  Neuronal correlates of parametric working memory in the prefrontal cortex , 1999, Nature.

[49]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Factors Affecting Frequency Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli: Implications for Cortical Encoding , 2006, PloS one.

[50]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[51]  C. J. Keemink,et al.  Evidence for different types of mechanoreceptors from measurements of the psychophysical threshold for vibrations under different stimulation conditions. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  Thomas K. Ferris,et al.  Continuously Informing Vibrotactile Displays in Support of Attention Management and Multitasking in Anesthesiology , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[53]  J. Hubbard,et al.  The Peripheral Nervous System , 1974, Springer US.

[54]  Lucas Spierer,et al.  Noise in Brain Activity Engenders Perception and Influences Discrimination Sensitivity , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[56]  V. Tannan,et al.  A portable tactile sensory diagnostic device , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[57]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[58]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Perception of Auditory Motion Affects Language Processing , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[59]  Peter B. Shull,et al.  Haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer – a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[60]  E. Ribot-Ciscar,et al.  Vibration sensitivity of slowly and rapidly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human foot and leg , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[61]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A Parametric Study of Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Human Working Memory , 1996, NeuroImage.

[62]  Lynette A. Jones,et al.  Mechanical and Psychophysical Studies of Surface Wave Propagation during Vibrotactile Stimulation Mechanical and Psychophysical Studies of Surface Wave Propagation during Vibrotactile Stimulation Acknowledgements , 2022 .

[63]  S. Scott,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Limb Position Sense Following Stroke , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[64]  S C Gandevia,et al.  Impairment of human proprioception by high‐frequency cutaneous vibration , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[65]  S. Scott Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[66]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  A Miniature Vibrotactile Sensory Substitution Device for Multifingered Hand Prosthetics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[67]  M. Rowe,et al.  Vibrotactile frequency discrimination in human hairy skin. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[68]  V. Tannan,et al.  Effects of adaptation on the capacity to differentiate simultaneously delivered dual-site vibrotactile stimuli , 2007, Brain Research.

[69]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Detection thresholds for stimuli in humans and monkeys: comparison with threshold events in mechanoreceptive afferent nerve fibers innervating the monkey hand. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[70]  C. Assaiante,et al.  Impaired vertical postural control and proprioceptive integration deficits in Parkinson’s disease , 2007, Neuroscience.

[71]  R. Cholewiak space, and time , 1999 .

[72]  R. Romo,et al.  Neuronal correlates of decision-making in secondary somatosensory cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[73]  C. Woolsey,et al.  NOTE ON THE ORGANIZATION OF THE TACTILE SENSORY AREA OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF THE CHIMPANZEE , 1943 .

[74]  Nicola Smania,et al.  Sensory integration balance training in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized, controlled trial , 2015, Multiple sclerosis.

[75]  C. Ghez,et al.  Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[76]  Christopher Summerfield,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Human Perceptual Choice Under Focused and Divided Attention , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[77]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[78]  Geoffrey M Boynton,et al.  Tactile hyperacuity thresholds correlate with finger maps in primary somatosensory cortex (S1). , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[79]  Martin G. Brodwin,et al.  Medical Psychosocial and Vocational Aspects of Disability , 1992 .

[80]  Christoph Stippich,et al.  Interaction of Tactile Input in the Human Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortex—A Magnetoencephalographic Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[81]  Kathleen H Sienko,et al.  The effect of age on postural and cognitive task performance while using vibrotactile feedback. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.