Application of In-Test Model Updating to Earthquake Structural Assessment

Analytical methods are frequently utilized for structural assessment due to their simplicity and cost-effectiveness. However, modeling of material inelasticity and geometric nonlinearity under reversed inelastic deformations is still very challenging and its accuracy is difficult to quantify. On the other hand, realistic experimental assessment is costly, time-consuming, and impractical for large or spatially extended structures. Hybrid simulation has been developed as an approach that combines the realism of experimental techniques with the economy of analytical tools. In hybrid simulation, the structural is divided into several modules such that the critical components are tested in the laboratory, while the rest of the structure is simulated numerically. The equations of motion solved in the computer enable the integration of the analytical and experimental components at each time increment. The objective of this article is to apply a newly developed identification and model updating scheme to acquire the material constitutive relationship from the physically tested specimen during the analysis to two complex hybrid simulation case studies. The identification scheme is developed and verified in a companion article, while the two experiments presented in this article are selected such that they address different structural engineering applications. First, a beam-column steel connection with heat treated beam section is analyzed. Afterwards, the response of a multi-bay concrete bridge is investigated. The results of these two examples demonstrate the effectiveness of model updating to improve the numerical model response as compared to the conventional hybrid simulation approaches.

[1]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Effect of random material variability on seismic design parameters of steel frames , 1991 .

[2]  Hisashi Tanaka,et al.  NON-LINEAR EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES BY A COMPUTER-ACTUATOR ON-LINE SYSTEM Part III : Reponse Analyses of 1-Bay 2-Story Steel Frames , 1980 .

[3]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  An online optimization method for bridge dynamic hybrid simulations , 2012, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[4]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  A framework for distributed analytical and hybrid simulations , 2008 .

[5]  Gilberto Mosqueda,et al.  Implementation of online model updating in hybrid simulation , 2014 .

[6]  Laura N. Lowes,et al.  Finite Element Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Bridge Connections , 1999 .

[7]  Adam Mueller Real-Time Hybrid Simulation with Online Model Updating , 2014 .

[8]  Thomas Michael Frankie Impact of complex system behavior on seismic assessment of RC bridges , 2013 .

[9]  Julio Appleton,et al.  Nonlinear cyclic stress-strain relationship of reinforcing bars including buckling , 1997 .

[10]  Viswanath Kammula,et al.  Model updating method for substructure pseudo‐dynamic hybrid simulation , 2013 .

[11]  Chia-Ming Chang,et al.  Numerical and hybrid analysis of a curved bridge and methods of numerical model calibration , 2014 .

[12]  C. Ayranci,et al.  A Novel Strain Sensor for Reinforced Concrete Structures , 2008 .

[13]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Pseudodynamic Method for Seismic Testing , 1985 .

[14]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[15]  D. H. Lee,et al.  Zeus NL - A System for Inelastic Analysis of Structures , 2004 .

[16]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Verification of Pseudo-dynamic testing of steel members , 1990 .

[17]  A. Nemirovski,et al.  Interior-point methods for optimization , 2008, Acta Numerica.

[18]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  On-line Model Updating in Hybrid Simulation Tests , 2014 .

[19]  H. Sol,et al.  Identification of Mechanical Material Behavior Through Inverse Modeling and DIC , 2008 .

[20]  Tarun R. Naik,et al.  214R-02 Evaluation of Strength Test Results of Concrete , 2002 .

[21]  A. S. Elnashai,et al.  Confined concrete model under cyclic load , 1997 .

[22]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  Extremely low cycle fatigue tests on structural carbon steel and stainless steel , 2010 .

[23]  Doug Q Schweizer Experimental Investigation of Innovative Seismic Performance Enhancement Techniques for Steel Building Beam to Column Moment Connections. , 2013 .

[24]  Motohiko Hakuno,et al.  DYNAMIC DESTRUCTIVE TEST OF A CANTILEVER BEAM, CONTROLLED BY AN ANALOG-COMPUTER , 1969 .