The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac

Objective: This study investigates the impact of a restricted craniocaudal (CC) field length of <20 cm on the selection of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who can be treated on the MR-Linac using a single isocentre technique. We also assess the effects of anthropometric factors and the neck position on the CC field length. Methods: 110 HNC patients who underwent radical primary or adjuvant radiotherapy were retrospectively analysed. We assessed the proportion of treatment fields with a CC length of <20 cm and the effects of gender, height, hyo-sternal neck length (distance from superior surface of hyoid to sternal notch measured on the coronal reconstruction of the planning CT) and neck position on CC length. Results: 95% of HNC patients had a CC field length <20 cm. Female patients showed a significantly shorter median CC length than male patients in both extended (p = 0.0003) and neutral (p = 0.008) neck positions. Neck position influenced the median CC length with neutral neck being significantly shorter than extended neck (p = 0.0119). Patient height and hyo-sternal neck length showed positive correlation with the CC length, with neck length in neutral position having the strongest correlation (r = 0.65, p = 0.0001 and r = 0.63, p < 0.0001, respectively for extended neck; r = 0.55, p = 0.0070 and r = 0.80, p < 0.0001, respectively for neutral neck). A hyo-sternal neck length of <14.6 cm predicted a CC length of <20 cm in neutral neck position. Conclusion: The majority of patients with HNC at the Royal Marsden Hospital have anthropometric features compatible with their being treated on the MR-Linac using a single isocentre technique. The absolute CC field size may vary according to primary tumour site, patient factors and neck position. A hyo-sternal neck length cut-off of 14.6 cm in the neutral neck position can be used as a surrogate marker for suitability of treatment on MR-Linac. Advances in knowledge: This paper highlights the potential impact of a restricted CC field in HNC patient selection for the MR-Linac treatment. This is the first report to suggest the use of neck length as a surrogate marker for suitability of treatment on the MR-Linac.

[1]  Humara Gul,et al.  Estimation of Body Stature Using the Percutaneous Length of Ulna of an Individual , 2020, Cureus.

[2]  E. Gualdi-Russo,et al.  Stature estimation from tibia percutaneous length: New equations derived from a Mediterranean population. , 2018, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[3]  A. McWilliam,et al.  EP-2073: The impact of the electron return effect on radiotherapy plan quality for peripheral sarcomas , 2018 .

[4]  A N T J Kotte,et al.  First patients treated with a 1.5 T MRI-Linac: clinical proof of concept of a high-precision, high-field MRI guided radiotherapy treatment , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Brian O'Sullivan,et al.  International guideline for the delineation of the clinical target volumes (CTV) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Technical Note: Investigating the impact of field size on patient selection for the 1.5T MR‐Linac , 2017, Medical physics.

[7]  D. McQuaid,et al.  Untersuchung von Strahlentherapieverfahren zur radikalen Bestrahlung von unilateralen Oropharynxtumoren: Dosimetrie und Komplikationswahrscheinlichkeit in Normalgeweben , 2016 .

[8]  J. Lagendijk,et al.  Virtual couch shift (VCS): accounting for patient translation and rotation by online IMRT re-optimization , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  S. Bhide,et al.  Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  J G M Kok,et al.  Integrating a 1.5 T MRI scanner with a 6 MV accelerator: proof of concept , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  C H Clark,et al.  Pre-trial quality assurance processes for an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) trial: PARSPORT, a UK multicentre Phase III trial comparing conventional radiotherapy and parotid-sparing IMRT for locally advanced head and neck cancer. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  B W Raaymakers,et al.  Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: dose increase at tissue–air interfaces in a lateral magnetic field due to returning electrons , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  K. Shin,et al.  Air–electron stream interactions during magnetic resonance IGRT , 2017, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[14]  Quynh-Thu Le,et al.  Delineation of the neck node levels for head and neck tumors: a 2013 update. DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG, TROG consensus guidelines. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  A. Vasavada,et al.  Head and neck anthropometry, vertebral geometry and neck strength in height-matched men and women. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.