Flowfield estimation in the wake of a pitching and heaving airfoil

Biological systems have shown great abilities for navigating dense and uncertain environments with variable winds or currents. These animals have unique sensors that allow them to detect the local flowfield and adjust their motor controls accordingly. One approach to leveraging biological sensing capabilities for engineered systems is to understand the sensing from a theoretical perspective. In this paper, flowfield observability and estimation is addressed in the framework of detecting vortices in the flow around a flapping airfoil. An unsteady potential flow model is developed, and the flowfield is measured using velocity sensors placed on the surface of the airfoil. The observability characteristics are identified using two methods, which reveal that for a set of surface velocity sensors, nonzero pitch and heave controls are required to achieve full state observability of airfoil velocities, angle-of-attack, and vortex locations and strengths. These interesting results indicate that wing flapping increases environment observability for animals with wing-mounted velocity sensors. The observability results are demonstrated in simulation with an unscented Kalman filter to estimate a discrete number of vortices in the wake of the flapping foil. Although the filter assumes only a small number of vortices to be estimated, the UKF is able to capture the structure of the wake vorticity.

[1]  J. Junkins,et al.  Optimal Estimation of Dynamic Systems , 2004 .

[2]  Hailong Xiong Geometric Mechanics, Ideal Hydrodynamics, and the Locomotion of Planar Shape -Changing Aquatic Vehicles , 2007 .

[3]  Jun Zou,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL LATERAL-LINE FLOW SENSORS , 2002 .

[4]  Michael Ghil,et al.  Extended Kalman filtering for vortex systems. Part 1: Methodology and point vortices , 1998 .

[5]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Source seeking for a Joukowski foil model of fish locomotion , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[6]  P. Newton The N-Vortex Problem , 2001 .

[7]  Wei Xian,et al.  Bat wing sensors support flight control , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  D. Weihs Hydromechanics of Fish Schooling , 1973, Nature.

[9]  Arthur J. Krener Observability of vortex flows , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Gilead Tadmor,et al.  Observers and feedback control for a rotating vortex pair , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[11]  T. Pitcher,et al.  A blind fish can school. , 1976, Science.

[12]  Perry Y. Li,et al.  Modeling and estimation of hydrodynamic potentials , 1999, Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.99CH36304).

[13]  Neil Anthony Sims,et al.  Fish without footprints , 2011, OCEANS'11 MTS/IEEE KONA.

[14]  Arthur J. Krener,et al.  Measures of unobservability , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[15]  W. J. Duncan Theoretical Aerodynamics , 1948, Nature.

[16]  Michael Ghil,et al.  Extended Kalman filtering for vortex systems. Part II: Rankine vortices and observing-system design , 1998 .

[17]  Imin Kao,et al.  Smart MEMS Flow Sensor: Theoretical Analysis and Experimental Characterization , 2007, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[18]  Carlos Silvestre,et al.  Single range aided navigation and source localization: Observability and filter design , 2011, Syst. Control. Lett..

[19]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Non-linear dynamical control systems , 1990 .