Do measures of body fat distribution provide information on the risk of type 2 diabetes in addition to measures of general obesity? Comparison of anthropometric predictors of type 2 diabetes in Pima Indians.

OBJECTIVE To investigate which anthropometric measurements of obesity best predict type 2 diabetes in a population of Pima Indians and whether additional information on diabetes risk could be obtained by combining measures of general obesity with measures of body fat distribution. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a prospective study of 624 men and 990 nonpregnant women >18 years of age without diabetes. Subjects were followed a mean of 5.25 years for the development of type 2 diabetes (using 1997 American Diabetes Association criteria). RESULTS A total of 322 new cases of type 2 diabetes (107 men and 215 women) were diagnosed during follow-up. Baseline obesity measurements were highly correlated and predicted diabetes in proportional hazards models adjusted for age. BMI had the highest hazard ratio in men and women, with age-adjusted hazard ratios per SD of 1.73 (95% CI 1.44-2.07) and 1.67 (1.45-1.91), respectively. According to receiver-operating characteristic analysis, BMI and waist-to-height ratio were the best predictors of diabetes in men, while in women BMI, waist-to-height ratio, waist circumference, and waist-to-thigh ratio were the best predictors. The predictive abilities of models containing BMI were not significantly improved by including other measures of general obesity or measures of the body fat distribution. CONCLUSIONS Throughout its range, BMI was an excellent predictor of type 2 diabetes risk in Pima Indians and was not significantly improved by combining it with other measures of general adiposity or body fat distribution.

[1]  Young Tk,et al.  Risk of clinical diabetes in a northern Native Canadian cohort. , 1994 .

[2]  S. Haffner,et al.  Waist circumference as the best predictor of noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) compared to body mass index, waist/hip ratio and other anthropometric measurements in Mexican Americans--a 7-year prospective study. , 1997, Obesity research.

[3]  Lincoln A Sargeant,et al.  Predicting incident diabetes in Jamaica: the role of anthropometry. , 2002, Obesity research.

[4]  L. Sjöström,et al.  Adiposity and adipose tissue distribution in relation to incidence of diabetes in women: results from a prospective population study in Gothenburg, Sweden. , 1989, International journal of obesity.

[5]  G A Colditz,et al.  Obesity, Fat Distribution, and Weight Gain as Risk Factors for Clinical Diabetes in Men , 1994, Diabetes Care.

[6]  P. Bennett,et al.  Diabetes mellitus in American (Pima) Indians. , 1971, Lancet.

[7]  S. Harris,et al.  Risk of clinical diabetes in a northern Native Canadian cohort. , 1994, Arctic medical research.

[8]  D. Cox,et al.  The Choice of Variables in Observational Studies , 1974 .

[9]  P. Björntorp,et al.  The Influence of Body Fat Distribution on the Incidence of Diabetes Mellitus: 13.5 Years of Follow-up of the Participants in the Study of Men Born in 1913 , 1985, Diabetes.

[10]  E. Ravussin,et al.  Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in obese individuals. , 1995, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[11]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[12]  G A Colditz,et al.  Body fat distribution and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. The Nurses' Health Study. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  A. Folsom,et al.  Increased incidence of diabetes mellitus in relation to abdominal adiposity in older women. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[14]  R. Hanson,et al.  Comparison of Body Size Measurements as Predictors of NIDDM in Pima Indians , 1995, Diabetes Care.