A New Class of Retrocausal Models
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Daniel C. Cole,et al. The quantum dice: An introduction to stochastic electrodynamics , 1996 .
[2] Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al. Weak values and neoclassical realism , 2018 .
[3] Timothy H. Boyer,et al. A Brief Survey of Stochastic Electrodynamics , 1980 .
[4] Ritchie,et al. Realization of a measurement of a "weak value" , 1991, Physical review letters.
[5] Huw Price,et al. Action Duality: A Constructive Principle for Quantum Foundations , 2011, Symmetry.
[6] Ken B. Wharton,et al. Time-Symmetric Boundary Conditions and Quantum Foundations , 2010, Symmetry.
[7] Huw Price,et al. Disentangling the Quantum World , 2015, Entropy.
[8] H. Price. Toy Models for Retrocausality , 2008, 0802.3230.
[9] M. B. Heaney. A Symmetrical Interpretation of the Klein-Gordon Equation , 2012, 1211.4645.
[10] Beyond the dynamical universe. Unifying block universe physics and time as experienced , 2019, Contemporary Physics.
[11] Dustin Lazarovici. A relativistic retrocausal model violating Bell's inequality , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[12] Bell’s theorem and the causal arrow of time , 2008, 0807.2041.
[13] Lawrence S. Schulman,et al. Experimental Test of the "Special State" Theory of Quantum Measurement , 2012, Entropy.
[14] R. Sutherland. Lagrangian Description for Particle Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics: Entangled Many-Particle Case , 2015, Foundations of Physics.
[15] K. Wharton. A Novel Interpretation of the Klein-Gordon Equation , 2007, 0706.4075.
[16] Huw Price,et al. A Probabilistic Version Outlined 3 Metaphysics Confused with Epistemology ? 4 Unavoidable Circularity ? 5 Unmanipulable Causes ? , 2008 .
[17] Ken B. Wharton,et al. Quantum States as Ordinary Information , 2014, Inf..
[18] Richard Corry. Retrocausal models for EPR , 2015 .
[19] Huw Price,et al. Agency and Probabilistic Causality , 1991, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[20] Matthew F Pusey,et al. Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality? , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[21] J. Dressel. Weak Values as Interference Phenomena , 2014, 1410.0943.
[22] Emily Adlam,et al. Spooky Action at a Temporal Distance , 2018, Entropy.
[23] A Local $$\psi $$ψ-Epistemic Retrocausal Hidden-Variable Model of Bell Correlations with Wavefunctions in Physical Space , 2018, Foundations of Physics.
[24] M. S. Leifer,et al. Is the Quantum State Real? An Extended Review of -ontology Theorems , 2014, 1409.1570.
[25] F. Nori,et al. Classical field approach to quantum weak measurements. , 2013, Physical review letters.
[26] Y. Aharonov,et al. The Two-State Vector Formalism: An Updated Review , 2008 .
[27] Basil J. Hiley,et al. An ontological basis for the quantum theory , 1987 .
[28] P. N. Kaloyerou. The GRA Beam-Splitter Experiments and Particle-Wave Duality of Light , 2005 .
[29] A. Harrison. Wavefunction collapse via a nonlocal relativistic variational principle , 2012, 1204.3969.
[30] David J. Starling,et al. Interferometric weak value deflections: Quantum and classical treatments , 2009, 0906.4832.
[31] H. Price. Time's arrow and Archimedes' point new directions for the physics of time , 1997 .
[32] A. Jordan,et al. Colloquium : Understanding quantum weak values: Basics and applications , 2013, 1305.7154.
[33] Steven Weinstein,et al. Learning the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations on a Restricted Boltzmann Machine , 2017, 1707.03114.
[34] R. Sutherland. Bell's theorem and backwards-in-time causality , 1983 .
[35] Keith A. Markus,et al. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation , 2007 .
[36] F. Nori,et al. Photon trajectories, anomalous velocities and weak measurements: a classical interpretation , 2013 .
[37] Are Retrocausal Accounts of Entanglement Unnaturally Fine-Tuned? , 2015, 1510.03706.
[38] Huw Price,et al. New Slant on the EPR-Bell Experiment , 2010, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[39] Vaidman,et al. How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. , 1988, Physical review letters.