T2-sequence with contrast inversion: diagnostic value in the investigation of gray matter heterotopias

To compare the diagnostic value of T1-inversion recovery sequence (T1 IR) to that of a T2-sequence with contrast inversion (T2 CI) in the investigation of heterotopias. In this study, we processed a contrast-inverted copy of our coronal T2-sequence of 21 patients with subependymal and subcortical heterotopias on an online picture archiving and communication system workstation. The diagnostic performance of these images was compared with the T1 IR of the same patients by quantitative and qualitative assessments regarding signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), lesion-to-white matter contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), lesion conspicuity, level of artifacts, overall image quality as well as diagnostic content. SNR values of the T2 CI were significantly higher than those of the T1 IR. CNR values of both sequences were similar. No relevant difference was found for lesion conspicuity and level of artifacts. Overall image quality of the T2 CI was rated slightly better by one reader. Both readers voted the images to have the same diagnostic content. Beside the exact depiction of the hippocampus in the high resoluted T2-sequence, its contrast-inverted copy (T2 CI) is also useful in the detection of heterotopias. In conjunction with the MPRAGE or MP2RAGE as a three-dimensional sequence, it could offer an equivalent and time-saving alternative to the T1 IR in the investigation of this type of malformation of cortical development.

[1]  A. Torres,et al.  Neuroimaging in Pediatric Epilepsy , 2019, Brain sciences.

[2]  Xiaopeng Wang,et al.  The clinical and imaging features of gray matter heterotopia: a clinical analysis on 15 patients , 2018, Neurological Sciences.

[3]  C. Elger,et al.  MRI in epilepsy: clinical standard and evolution , 2018, Current opinion in neurology.

[4]  G. Kalamangalam,et al.  Intracranial evaluation and laser ablation for epilepsy with periventricular nodular heterotopia , 2016, Seizure.

[5]  A. Represa,et al.  Causes and Consequences of Gray Matter Heterotopia , 2015, CNS neuroscience & therapeutics.

[6]  H. Huppertz,et al.  Automated morphometric magnetic resonance imaging analysis for the detection of periventricular nodular heterotopia , 2013, Epilepsia.

[7]  K. Moghazy,et al.  Assessment of gray matter heterotopia by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2012, World journal of radiology.

[8]  M. Skalej,et al.  Radiofrequency lesioning for epileptogenic periventricular nodular heterotopia: A rational approach , 2011, Epilepsia.

[9]  A. Merkenschlager,et al.  Heterotopie, Polymikrogyrie, Lissenzephalie und Co – Malformationen der kortikalen Hirnentwicklung , 2010, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[10]  Nadia Colombo,et al.  Nodular heterotopia: A neuropathological study of 24 patients undergoing surgery for drug‐resistant epilepsy , 2009, Epilepsia.

[11]  F. Mauguière,et al.  SEEG-guided thermocoagulations , 2008, Neurology.

[12]  D. Altenmüller,et al.  Voxel‐based 3D MRI analysis helps to detect subtle forms of subcortical band heterotopia , 2008, Epilepsia.

[13]  C. Nimsky,et al.  Periventricular nodular heterotopia: A challenge for epilepsy surgery , 2007, Seizure.

[14]  Ludovico D'Incerti,et al.  Periventricular Nodular Heterotopia: Classification, Epileptic History, and Genesis of Epileptic Discharges , 2006, Epilepsia.

[15]  Jean Gotman,et al.  The role of periventricular nodular heterotopia in epileptogenesis. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  A. Barkovich Morphologic characteristics of subcortical heterotopia: MR imaging study. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[17]  N. Desai,et al.  Utility of double inversion recovery MRI in paediatric epilepsy. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  R. Watts,et al.  Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging metrics in perilesional white matter among children with periventricular nodular gray matter heterotopia , 2013, Pediatric Radiology.