Modeling photoacoustic spectral features of micron-sized particles

The photoacoustic signal generated from particles when irradiated by light is determined by attributes of the particle such as the size, speed of sound, morphology and the optical absorption coefficient. Unique features such as periodically varying minima and maxima are observed throughout the photoacoustic signal power spectrum, where the periodicity depends on these physical attributes. The frequency content of the photoacoustic signals can be used to obtain the physical attributes of unknown particles by comparison to analytical solutions of homogeneous symmetric geometric structures, such as spheres. However, analytical solutions do not exist for irregularly shaped particles, inhomogeneous particles or particles near structures. A finite element model (FEM) was used to simulate photoacoustic wave propagation from four different particle configurations: a homogeneous particle suspended in water, a homogeneous particle on a reflecting boundary, an inhomogeneous particle with an absorbing shell and non-absorbing core, and an irregularly shaped particle such as a red blood cell. Biocompatible perfluorocarbon droplets, 3-5 μm in diameter containing optically absorbing nanoparticles were used as the representative ideal particles, as they are spherical, homogeneous, optically translucent, and have known physical properties. The photoacoustic spectrum of micron-sized single droplets in suspension and on a reflecting boundary were measured over the frequency range of 100-500 MHz and compared directly to analytical models and the FEM. Good agreement between the analytical model, FEM and measured values were observed for a droplet in suspension, where the spectral minima agreed to within a 3.3 MHz standard deviation. For a droplet on a reflecting boundary, spectral features were correctly reproduced using the FEM but not the analytical model. The photoacoustic spectra from other common particle configurations such as particle with an absorbing shell and a biconcave-shaped red blood cell were also investigated, where unique features in the power spectrum could be used to identify them.

[1]  Y. C. Fung,et al.  Improved measurements of the erythrocyte geometry. , 1972, Microvascular research.

[2]  W. Grill,et al.  Age-Dependent Acoustic and Microelastic Properties of Red Blood Cells Determined by Vector Contrast Acoustic Microscopy , 2012, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[3]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  Effects of erythrocyte oxygenation on optoacoustic signals. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[4]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Dark-Field Confocal Photoacoustic Microscopy , 2009 .

[5]  John A. Rowlands,et al.  Nanoparticle-Tagged Perfluorocarbon Droplets for Medical Imaging , 2008 .

[6]  Gerald J. Diebold,et al.  The photoacoustic effect generated by a spherical droplet in a fluid , 1988 .

[8]  Chulhong Kim,et al.  Porphysome nanovesicles generated by porphyrin bilayers for use as multimodal biophotonic contrast agents. , 2011, Nature materials.

[9]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  Probing red blood cell morphology using high-frequency photoacoustics. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Ivan Gorelikov,et al.  Acoustic and photoacoustic characterization of micron-sized perfluorocarbon emulsions , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[11]  Zhaohui Wang,et al.  Evaluation of finite-element-based simulation model of photoacoustics in biological tissues , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[12]  J. Arendt Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[13]  B T Cox,et al.  k-Wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[14]  J W Hunt,et al.  High-frequency ultrasound scattering from microspheres and single cells. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Jian Lu,et al.  Thermoelastic finite element modeling of laser generation ultrasound , 2006 .

[16]  Hua-bei Jiang,et al.  Finite-element-based photoacoustic tomography in time domain , 2009 .

[17]  Ivan Gorelikov,et al.  Single-step coating of mesoporous silica on cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide-capped nanoparticles. , 2008, Nano letters.

[18]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Measuring single-cell density , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography of epilepsy with high temporal and spatial resolution and dual optical contrasts , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Jackie Y Ying,et al.  Silica-coated nanocomposites of magnetic nanoparticles and quantum dots. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[21]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  Chulhong Kim,et al.  Porphyrin shell microbubbles with intrinsic ultrasound and photoacoustic properties. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[23]  Eric M. Strohm,et al.  High frequency label-free photoacoustic microscopy of single cells☆ , 2013, Photoacoustics.

[24]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustic tomography for structural and functional in vivo imaging of the brain , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  Ivan Gorelikov,et al.  Silica-coated quantum dots for optical evaluation of perfluorocarbon droplet interactions with cells. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[26]  Roy G. M. Kolkman,et al.  In vivo photoacoustic imaging of blood vessels using an extreme-narrow aperture sensor , 2003 .

[27]  A. Tarakanova,et al.  Molecular modeling of protein materials: case study of elastin , 2013 .

[28]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic Tomography: In Vivo Imaging from Organelles to Organs , 2012, Science.

[29]  R. Niessner,et al.  Acoustical properties of selected tissue phantom materials for ultrasound imaging , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Paulette Mehta,et al.  Wintrobe’s Clinical Hematology , 2009 .

[31]  Scott R. Manalis,et al.  Measuring the mass, density, and size of particles and cells using a suspended microchannel resonator , 2007 .

[32]  Ivan Gorelikov,et al.  Optical droplet vaporization (ODV): Photoacoustic characterization of perfluorocarbon droplets , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[33]  Lihong V. Wang Photoacoustic imaging and spectroscopy , 2009 .

[34]  Helmuth Möhwald,et al.  Near-IR remote release from assemblies of liposomes and nanoparticles. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[35]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[36]  E. M. Strohm,et al.  Sound velocity and attenuation measurements of perfluorocarbon liquids using photoacoustic methods , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[37]  Frank Stracke,et al.  Preparation and biological evaluation of multifunctional PLGA-nanoparticles designed for photoacoustic imaging. , 2011, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[38]  M. I. Khan,et al.  Photoacoustic "Signatures" of Particulate Matter: Optical Production of Acoustic Monopole Radiation , 1990, Science.

[39]  P. Beard Biomedical photoacoustic imaging , 2011, Interface Focus.

[40]  F. M. van den Engh,et al.  Initial results of in vivo non-invasive cancer imaging in the human breast using near-infrared photoacoustics. , 2007, Optics express.

[41]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  High-resolution photoacoustic tomography of resting-state functional connectivity in the mouse brain , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Alexei V. Demchenko,et al.  Noninvasive photoacoustic computed tomography of mouse brain metabolism in vivo , 2013, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[43]  Jian Lu,et al.  Numerical simulation of laser-generated ultrasound by the finite element method , 2004 .

[44]  Samuel A Wickline,et al.  Temperature dependence of acoustic impedance for specific fluorocarbon liquids. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  Huabei Jiang,et al.  Three-dimensional finite-element-based photoacoustic tomography: reconstruction algorithm and simulations. , 2007, Medical physics.

[46]  David T. Deihl,et al.  “N Waves” from Bursting Balloons , 1968 .

[47]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[48]  Stanislav Emelianov,et al.  Biomedical photoacoustics beyond thermal expansion using triggered nanodroplet vaporization for contrast-enhanced imaging , 2012, Nature Communications.

[49]  Ivan Gorelikov,et al.  Vaporization of perfluorocarbon droplets using optical irradiation , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[50]  Sheng-Wen Huang,et al.  Targeted gold nanorod contrast agent for prostate cancer detection by photoacoustic imaging , 2007 .

[51]  Eric M. Strohm,et al.  PLGA/PFC particles loaded with gold nanoparticles as dual contrast agents for photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging , 2014, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[52]  K. M. Swamy,et al.  Ultrasonic velocity in and adiabatic compressibility for some fluorocarbon liquid mixtures , 1989 .

[53]  J B Fowlkes,et al.  Acoustic droplet vaporization for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[54]  P. J. Goetz,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of proteins and blood cells. , 2006, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[55]  M. Povey,et al.  Longitudinal acoustic properties of poly(lactic acid) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) , 2010, Biomedical materials.

[56]  V. Zharov,et al.  Golden carbon nanotubes as multimodal photoacoustic and photothermal high-contrast molecular agents. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.