Decision making and software solutions with regard to waste management

Abstract Material efficiency in lifecycles is a challenge that affects product innovators, producers and political stakeholders. The recycling and waste management is a direct consequence of this challenge, heavily compounded by data requirements. Especially third parties such as recyclers, remanufacturers or waste treatment sites face limited documentation and data on products. In addition, those actors face additional data management challenges due to their distinct upstream supply chains of dispersed suppliers and hence due to interrupted information flows. This study investigated various software tools to critically compare the tool's potential to improve data availability and data completeness, as well as the management of the reuse or recycling business processes using Enterprise Resource Planning software evaluation metrics for each waste-related sub-domain. The main objective of this paper is thus to provide a framework for comparison through key features, measured adherence to these features and to infer how this affects the software landscape. Software packages were sampled using public software listings and keyword filters to arrive at a final subset of publically accessible software packages, which were then critically analysed and compared by feature support. The main results of the comparison of these software packages in the discussed waste-related sub-domains revealed that data compatibility between packages and reporting requirements is the largest issue on a general level. On the level of sub-domains, the results showed that software offerings lack essential domain-specific features in order to support circular lifecycles of products and materials. Secondary results revealed a lack of database interoperability and various lesser concerns, such as incorrectly reported pricing or obsolescence information. The impact of these missing features reinforces the “silo” effect of packages, reduces the adoption rate in larger companies, and compounds the problem of smaller start-ups and companies using manual paper-based solutions and lacking reporting capabilities. Publically available databases and an increased rate of sharing of information between Original Equipment Manufacturers and recyclers would improve the decision-making through software solutions in waste-related processing.

[1]  Amy Van Looy Business Process Maturity - A Comparative Study on a Sample of Business Process Maturity Models , 2014, Springer Briefs in Business Process Management.

[2]  Priyanka Shrivastava,et al.  A Review of Solid Waste Management Techniques Using GIS and Other Technologies , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN).

[3]  Carles M. Gasol,et al.  Methodology of supporting decision-making of waste management with material flow analysis (MFA) and consequential life cycle assessment (CLCA): case study of waste paper recycling , 2015 .

[4]  Umit Bititci,et al.  Disassembly for remanufacturing: a systematic literature review, new model development and future research needs , 2016 .

[5]  Barbara Ann Kitchenham,et al.  Evaluating software engineering methods and tool part 1: The evaluation context and evaluation methods , 1996, SOEN.

[6]  Stefan Hack,et al.  The Potential of IT for Corporate Sustainability , 2014 .

[7]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Factors used in the selection of packaged software in small businesses: Views of owners and managers , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Alie Wube Dametew Problems of Solid Waste Management in Small and Medium Enterprises , 2015 .

[9]  Ronald J Kopicki,et al.  REUSE AND RECYCLING -- REVERSE LOGISTICS OPPORTUNITIES / , 1993 .

[10]  Marc Salomon,et al.  Strategic Issues in Product Recovery Management , 1995 .

[11]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Strategic Sourcing of Information Systems: Perspectives and Practices , 1998 .

[12]  William Powrie,et al.  SWIMS: A dynamic life cycle-based optimisation and decision support tool for solid waste management , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[13]  Anmar Abuhamdah,et al.  Components and Analysis Method of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Requirements in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) , 2016 .

[14]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Eco-sustainable energy and environmental strategies in design for recycling: the software “ENDLESS” , 2003 .

[15]  Johan Östlin,et al.  Product life-cycle implications for remanufacturing strategies , 2009 .

[16]  Mitchel Lowe Energy From Waste; A guide to the debate , 2017 .

[17]  Adriana Rodrigues,et al.  Developing criteria for performance assessment in municipal solid waste management , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[18]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Combined material flow analysis and life cycle assessment as a support tool for solid waste management decision making , 2016 .

[19]  Sebastian Thöns,et al.  Environmental sustainable decision making– The need and obstacles for integration of LCA into decision analysis , 2018, Environmental Science & Policy.

[20]  Asli Coban,et al.  Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey , 2018 .

[21]  Dimitar Zvezdov,et al.  Carbon footprinting of large product portfolios. Extending the use of Enterprise Resource Planning systems to carbon information management , 2016 .

[22]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Operational sustainability metrics assessing metric effectiveness in the context of electronics-recycling systems. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  Solid waste management in European countries: a review of systems analysis techniques. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: ERP adoption by European midsize companies , 2000, CACM.

[25]  J. Ansah,et al.  Modelling solid waste management solutions: The case of Campania, Italy. , 2018, Waste management.

[26]  Karl E. Wiegers,et al.  Software Requirements , 1999 .

[27]  Masoomeh Zeinalnezhad,et al.  A master plan for the implementation of sustainable enterprise resource planning systems (part I): concept and methodology , 2015 .

[28]  I. S. Jawahir,et al.  Technological Elements of Circular Economy and the Principles of 6R-Based Closed-loop Material Flow in Sustainable Manufacturing , 2016 .

[29]  Rajendra M. Sonar,et al.  Evaluating and selecting software packages: A review , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[30]  Ben Light Potential pitfalls in packaged software adoption , 2005, CACM.

[31]  T. Cooper,et al.  A conceptual framework for negotiating public involvement in municipal waste management decision-making in the UK. , 2017, Waste management.

[32]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  A conceptual framework for ERP benefit classification: Results of a literature review , 2009 .

[33]  C. McMahon,et al.  Reducing waste: repair, recondition, remanufacture or recycle? , 2006 .

[34]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  Sustainable enterprise resource planning: imperatives and research directions , 2014 .

[35]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  A roadmap for Sustainable Enterprise Resource Planning systems implementation (part III) , 2018 .

[36]  Huibrecht Margaretha van der Poll,et al.  Integrating ERP and MFCA systems for improved waste-reduction decisions in a brewery in South Africa , 2013 .

[37]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  Development of a roadmap for Sustainable Enterprise Resource Planning systems implementation (part II) , 2017 .

[38]  Judy E. Scott Mobility, Business Process Management, Software Sourcing, and Maturity Model Trends: Propositions for the IS Organization of the Future , 2007, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[39]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  A roadmap towards integrated assessment and participatory strategies in support of decision-making processes. The case of urban waste management , 2017 .