Detecting activation in fMRI data

We present a simple approach to the analysis of fMRI data collected from several runs, sessions and subjects. We take advantage of the spatial nature of the data to reduce the noise in certain key parameters, achieving an increase in degrees of freedom for a mixed effects analysis. Our main interest is the analysis of the resulting images of test statistics using the geometry of random fields. We show how the Euler characteristic of the excursion set plays a key role in setting the threshold of the image to detect regions of the brain activated by a stimulus.

[1]  R. Adler,et al.  The Geometry of Random Fields , 1982 .

[2]  P. Guttorp,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation of Nonstationary Spatial Covariance Structure , 1992 .

[3]  K. Worsley,et al.  Local Maxima and the Expected Euler Characteristic of Excursion Sets of χ 2, F and t Fields , 1994, Advances in Applied Probability.

[4]  J B Poline,et al.  Enhanced Detection in Brain Activation Maps Using a Multifiltering Approach , 1994, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[5]  D. Siegmund,et al.  Testing for a Signal with Unknown Location and Scale in a Stationary Gaussian Random Field , 1995 .

[6]  K. Worsley,et al.  Boundary corrections for the expected Euler characteristic of excursion sets of random fields, with an application to astrophysics , 1995, Advances in Applied Probability.

[7]  C. Mountford Non-linear Fourier time series analysis for human brain mapping by functional magnetic resonance imaging - Discussion , 1997 .

[8]  Scott L. Zeger,et al.  Non‐linear Fourier Time Series Analysis for Human Brain Mapping by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997 .

[9]  K. Worsley,et al.  The geometry of correlation fields with an application to functional connectivity of the brain , 1999 .

[10]  K. Worsley,et al.  THE DETECTION OF LOCAL SHAPE CHANGES VIA THE GEOMETRY OF HOTELLING’S T 2 FIELDS 1 , 1999 .

[11]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Detecting changes in nonisotropic images , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[12]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[13]  Christopher R. Genovese,et al.  A Bayesian Time-Course Model for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2000 .

[14]  R. Adler On excursion sets, tube formulas and maxima of random fields , 2000 .

[15]  A Bayesian Time-Course Model for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data: Comment , 2000 .

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Responses in fMRI: The Balloon Model, Volterra Kernels, and Other Hemodynamics , 2000, NeuroImage.

[17]  D Le Bihan,et al.  Detection of fMRI activation using Cortical Surface Mapping , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[18]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Locally Regularized Spatiotemporal Modeling and Model Comparison for Functional MRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[19]  K. Worsley Testing for signals with unknown location and scale in a χ2 random field, with an application to fMRI , 2001, Advances in Applied Probability.

[20]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A General Statistical Analysis for fMRI Data , 2000, NeuroImage.

[21]  J. -B. Poline,et al.  Estimating the Delay of the fMRI Response , 2002, NeuroImage.

[22]  Akimichi Takemura,et al.  ON THE EQUIVALENCE OF THE TUBE AND EULER CHARACTERISTIC METHODS FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE MAXIMUM OF GAUSSIAN FIELDS OVER PIECEWISE SMOOTH DOMAINS , 2002 .

[23]  Bruce Pike,et al.  Differentiating noxious- and innocuous-related activation of human somatosensory cortices using temporal analysis of fMRI. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[25]  Robert J. Adler,et al.  Euler characteristics for Gaussian fields on manifolds , 2003 .