What is important in electronic textbooks for students of different achievement levels?

This paper reports the findings of a study that explored which characteristics of electronic textbooks correlated with knowledge acquisition by learners of different achievement levels. The study was carried out on 35 units of electronic textbooks that were studied by 19 high-achieving and 19 low-achieving students in four Estonian schools. The low-achieving students profited from clear instructions, familiar icons, examples, and answering from the keyboard. The high-achieving students benefited from key-combinations, menus with different levels, the Internet, analogies and lower density of terms in the content of the material. In electronic textbooks, not only the content, but also the design of the software, should be different for learners with a different achievement level.

[1]  Lawrence J. Najjar.  Multimedia information and learning , 1996 .

[2]  W. Michael Reed,et al.  Summary of Special Issue on Assessing the Impact of Computer-Based Learning Since 1987 , 1996 .

[3]  Scott W. Brown,et al.  Children’s Hypertext Navigation Strategies , 2002 .

[4]  Randall Boone,et al.  Evaluating Educational Software for Special Education , 2000 .

[5]  Diane McGrath,et al.  Hypertext, CAI, Paper, or Program Control: Do Learners Benefit From Choices? , 1992 .

[6]  Ian E. Hughes.  “Horses for courses” - categories of computer-based learning program and their uses in pharmacology courses , 1998 .

[7]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  The Effects of Navigational and Generative Activities in Hypertext Learning on Problem Solving and Comprehension , 1999 .

[9]  Louis H. Berry.  Cognitive Effects of Web Page Design , 2000 .

[10]  Michael Szabo,et al.  An Experimental Study of Animation, Mathematics Achievement, and Attitude Toward Computer-Assisted Instruction , 1996 .

[11]  W. Howard Levie,et al.  Effects of text illustrations: A review of research , 1982 .

[12]  Robert W. Swezey,et al.  Readings in training and simulation : a 30-year perspective , 2001 .

[13]  Jean Underwood,et al.  Cognitive style, hypermedia navigation and learning , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Leah P. McCoy.  Computer-Based Mathematics Learning , 1996, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[15]  Robin Phillips,et al.  Developer's Handbook to Interactive Multimedia: A Practical Guide for Education Applications , 1997 .

[16]  Michael J. Berson.  Effectiveness of Computer Technology in the Social Studies: A Review of the Literature , 1996 .

[17]  Lawrence J. Najjar.  Principles of Educational Multimedia User Interface Design , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Stephen M. Alessi,et al.  Multimedia for Learning: Methods and Development , 2000 .

[19]  Beverly Abbey,et al.  网络教育 : 教学与认知发展新视角 = Instructional and Cognitive Impacts of Web -Based Education , 1999 .

[20]  Tom Boyle,et al.  Design for multimedia learning , 1997 .

[21]  Joan K. Gallini,et al.  When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1990 .

[22]  Forbes Gibb,et al.  The WEB Book experiments in electronic textbook design , 2003, J. Documentation.

[23]  Robert A. Reiser,et al.  The Effects of Self-Regulation and Instructional Control on Performance and Motivation in Computer-based Instruction , 2000 .

[24]  Rossana de Beni,et al.  Visuospatial working memory in learning from multimedia systems , 2000, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[25]  Jaan Mikk,et al.  Textbook: Research and Writing , 2000 .

[26]  Elizabeth Boling,et al.  Text Labels for Hypertext Navigation Buttons. , 1998 .