Geiger V2.0: an Expanded Suite of Methods for Fitting Macroevolutionary Models to Phylogenetic Trees

SUMMARY Phylogenetic comparative methods are essential for addressing evolutionary hypotheses with interspecific data. The scale and scope of such data have increased dramatically in the past few years. Many existing approaches are either computationally infeasible or inappropriate for data of this size. To address both of these problems, we present geiger v2.0, a complete overhaul of the popular R package geiger. We have reimplemented existing methods with more efficient algorithms and have developed several new approaches for accomodating heterogeneous models and data types. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION  This R package is available on the CRAN repository http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/geiger/. All source code is also available on github http://github.com/mwpennell/geiger-v2. geiger v2.0 depends on the ape package. CONTACT mwpennell@gmail.com SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION  Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

[1]  Chad D. Brock,et al.  Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Robert P. Freckleton,et al.  Fast likelihood calculations for comparative analyses , 2012 .

[3]  L. Harmon,et al.  INTEGRATING FOSSILS WITH MOLECULAR PHYLOGENIES IMPROVES INFERENCE OF TRAIT EVOLUTION , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  R. FitzJohn Diversitree: comparative phylogenetic analyses of diversification in R , 2012 .

[5]  J. Felsenstein Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. , 1973, American journal of human genetics.

[6]  M. Pagel Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Luke J. Harmon,et al.  GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations , 2008, Bioinform..

[8]  Matthew W. Pennell,et al.  An integrative view of phylogenetic comparative methods: connections to population genetics, community ecology, and paleobiology , 2013, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Matthew W Pennell,et al.  Robust regression and posterior predictive simulation increase power to detect early bursts of trait evolution. , 2014, Systematic biology.

[10]  Korbinian Strimmer,et al.  APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language , 2004, Bioinform..

[11]  Richard G FitzJohn,et al.  Estimating trait-dependent speciation and extinction rates from incompletely resolved phylogenies. , 2009, Systematic biology.

[12]  Luke J. Harmon,et al.  Simpsonian 'Evolution by Jumps' in an Adaptive Radiation of Anolis Lizards , 2013, 1305.4216.

[13]  P. Green Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination , 1995 .

[14]  P. Joyce,et al.  A NOVEL COMPARATIVE METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING SHIFTS IN THE RATE OF CHARACTER EVOLUTION ON TREES , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  W. Jetz,et al.  The global diversity of birds in space and time , 2012, Nature.

[16]  Gavin H. Thomas,et al.  MOTMOT: models of trait macroevolution on trees , 2012 .

[17]  C. Ané,et al.  A linear-time algorithm for Gaussian and non-Gaussian trait evolution models. , 2014, Systematic biology.

[18]  Luke J. Harmon,et al.  Congruification: support for time scaling large phylogenetic trees , 2013 .

[19]  Daniel Wegmann,et al.  FITTING MODELS OF CONTINUOUS TRAIT EVOLUTION TO INCOMPLETELY SAMPLED COMPARATIVE DATA USING APPROXIMATE BAYESIAN COMPUTATION , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.