Eco-efficiency analysis of recycling recovered solid wood from construction into laminated timber products.

To establish a bioeconomy, the demand for renewable resources like wood is likely to increase. To satisfy the demand, cascading, i.e. the sequential use of one unit of a resource in multiple applications with energy recovery as the final step, is a key concept to improve the efficiency of wood utilization. Today, the systematic wood cascading is still in its infancies and limited to the downcycling of wood, i.e. the degradation of material quality. New recycling technologies are needed, which maintain the material quality at the beginning of the cascade chain and mobilize yet unused resources. Therefore, a new recycling technology for recovered solid wood from construction into glued laminated timber products was developed.1 To identify the environmental and economic performance of the process, the eco-efficiency was assessed by the joint application of life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC). As reference system, the incineration of the recovered wood was analyzed, representing the common treatment for recovered wood from construction in Germany. System expansion was applied to solve multifunctionality. The results indicate that the recycling of recovered wood into glued laminated timber products is environmentally and economically viable and offers possibility for the production of value added products. The recycling further shows up to 29% of lower environmental impacts and 32% of lower costs compared to the incineration, if system expansion is based on wood energy. The operational processes required for the solid wood cascading are of minor relevance for the economic and environmental performance. Instead, primary technologies like glue lamination and the incineration are key drivers. In all considered scenarios, the material recycling has a 15-150% higher eco-efficiency compared to the incineration. In conclusion, the further development for the practical implementation of the recycling process is recommended to enhance the implementation of the cascading concept.

[1]  Joan Rieradevall,et al.  Life cycle assessment of wood wastes: A case study of ephemeral architecture. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Biogenic Carbon and Temporary Storage Addressed with Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment , 2013 .

[3]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Methodological aspects of life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management systems , 1999 .

[4]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  Utilization of recovered wood in cascades versus utilization of primary wood—a comparison with life cycle assessment using system expansion , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  Peter J. Fraanje,et al.  Cascading of pine wood , 1997 .

[6]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Environmental and technical feasibility study of upcycling wood waste into cement-bonded particleboard , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[7]  Martin Junginger,et al.  The GHG contribution of the cascaded use of harvested wood products in comparison with the use of wood for energy-A case study on available forest resources in Canada , 2013 .

[8]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  Resource efficiency of multifunctional wood cascade chains using LCA and exergy analysis, exemplified by a case study for Germany , 2017 .

[9]  Takeshi Fujiwara,et al.  Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing toward eco-efficiency concrete waste management in Malaysia , 2018 .

[10]  M. Irle,et al.  Intelligent recycling of solid wood. , 2015 .

[11]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Patrick Reumerman,et al.  Assessing wood use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of wood product cascading in the European Union , 2018 .

[13]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  LCA-based optimization of wood utilization under special consideration of a cascading use of wood. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  M. Siika‐aho,et al.  Utilization of recycled wood in biorefineries: preliminary results of steam explosion and ethanol/water organosolv pulping without a catalyst , 2016, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products.

[15]  J. Eyckmans,et al.  Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making. , 2018, Waste management.

[16]  Frank Werner,et al.  Wooden building products in comparative LCA , 2007 .

[17]  Lei Wang,et al.  Value-added recycling of construction waste wood into noise and thermal insulating cement-bonded particleboards , 2016 .

[18]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  Potentials for cascading of recovered wood from building deconstruction—A case study for south-east Germany , 2013 .

[19]  Frank Werner,et al.  Wooden building products in comparative LCA: A literature review , 2007 .

[20]  Mario Grosso,et al.  Recycling processes and quality of secondary materials: Food for thought for waste-management-oriented life cycle assessment studies. , 2018, Waste management.

[21]  C. Poon,et al.  Comparative LCA of wood waste management strategies generated from building construction activities , 2018 .

[22]  Ted Sirkin,et al.  The cascade chain: A theory and tool for achieving resource sustainability with applications for product design , 1994 .

[23]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Life Cycle Assessments for Wood Energy Services , 2016 .

[24]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Substitution potentials of recycled HDPE and wood particles from post-consumer packaging waste in Wood-Plastic Composites. , 2015, Waste management.

[25]  Atsushi Takano,et al.  The potential for cascading wood from demolished buildings: the condition of recovered wood through a case study in Finland , 2016 .

[26]  Mateusz Lewandowski,et al.  Designing the Business Models for Circular Economy—Towards the Conceptual Framework , 2016 .

[27]  Thomas H Christensen,et al.  Recycling of wood for particle board production: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[28]  Holger Militz,et al.  Wood polymer composites and their contribution to cascading utilisation , 2016 .

[29]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Economic viability analysis of a construction and demolition waste recycling plant in Portugal – part I: location, materials, technology and economic analysis , 2013 .

[30]  E. Bonnin,et al.  Advanced recycling of post-consumer solid wood and MDF , 2019 .

[31]  David Hunkeler,et al.  Environmental life-cycle costing: a code of practice , 2011 .

[32]  Jeroen B. Guinée,et al.  Ex-ante LCA of Emerging Technologies , 2018 .

[33]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[34]  Daniel C W Tsang,et al.  Mechanical, durability and environmental aspects of magnesium oxychloride cement boards incorporating waste wood , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[35]  Ashwani Kumar,et al.  Annual Report 2013-2014 , 2014 .

[36]  Matthias Schumann,et al.  Environmental impacts of wood-based products under consideration of cascade utilization: A systematic literature review , 2018 .

[37]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Energy and carbon balances of wood cascade chains , 2006 .

[38]  M. Hughes,et al.  Forest sector circular economy development in Finland: A regional study on sustainability driven competitive advantage and an assessment of the potential for cascading recovered solid wood , 2017 .

[39]  Mi Hyung Kim,et al.  Analysis of the global warming potential for wood waste recycling systems , 2014 .

[40]  Bernhard Steubing,et al.  Life Cycle Impacts and Benefits of Wood along the Value Chain: The Case of Switzerland , 2017 .

[41]  Laura Schneider,et al.  Challenges in Life Cycle Assessment: An Overview of Current Gaps and Research Needs , 2014 .

[42]  Tobias Stern,et al.  Cascading Utilization of Wood: a Matter of Circular Economy? , 2017, Current Forestry Reports.

[43]  Alfred Teischinger,et al.  Quantification of future availabilities of recovered wood from Austrian residential buildings , 2017 .

[44]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  Compared environmental and economic impact from cradle to gate of concrete with natural and recycled coarse aggregates , 2017 .

[45]  J. M. Earles,et al.  Consequential life cycle assessment: a review , 2011 .

[46]  Hubert Jochheim,et al.  Effect of cascade use on the carbon balance of the German and European wood sectors , 2018 .

[47]  Walter Kloepffer,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of products , 2008 .

[48]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Emerging Technologies: Recommendations for Prospective LCA , 2018, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[49]  Susan Selke,et al.  Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials – Reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations , 2013 .