Graphene Meets Microbubbles: A Superior Contrast Agent for Photoacoustic Imaging.

Coupling graphene with a soft polymer surface offers the possibility to build hybrid constructs with new electrical, optical, and mechanical properties. However, the low reactivity of graphene is a hurdle in the synthesis of such systems which is often bypassed by oxidizing its carbon planar structure. However, the defects introduced with this process jeopardize the properties of graphene. In this paper we present a different approach, applicable to many different polymer surfaces, which uses surfactant assisted ultrasonication to exfoliate, and simultaneously suspend, graphene in water in its intact form. Tethering pristine graphene sheets to the surfaces is accomplished by using suitable reactive functional groups of the surfactant scaffold. We focused on applying this approach to the fabrication of a hybrid system, made of pristine graphene tethered to poly(vinyl alcohol) based microbubbles (PVA MBs), designed for enhancing photoacoustic signals. Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) is a powerful preclinical diagnostic tool which provides real time images at a resolution of 40 μm. The leap toward clinical imaging has so far been hindered by the limited tissues penetration of near-infrared (NIR) pulsed laser radiation. Many academic and industrial research laboratories have met this challenge by designing devices, each with pros and cons, to enhance the photoacoustic (PA) signal. The major advantages of the hybrid graphene/PVA MBs construct, however, are (i) the preservation of graphene properties, (ii) biocompatibility, a consequence of the robust anchoring of pristine graphene to the bioinert surface of the PVA bubble, and (iii) a very good enhancement in a NIR spectral region of the PA signal, which does not overlap with the signals of PA active endogenous molecules such as hemoglobin.

[1]  A. Bianco Graphene: Safe or Toxic? The Two Faces of the Medal , 2013 .

[2]  A. Olszyna,et al.  Recent advances in graphene family materials toxicity investigations , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[3]  Gang Zheng,et al.  In situ conversion of porphyrin microbubbles to nanoparticles for multimodality imaging. , 2015, Nature nanotechnology.

[4]  R. Ruoff,et al.  Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites , 2011 .

[5]  Y. Ling,et al.  Graphene-based nanomaterials as molecular imaging agents. , 2015, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[6]  Andre K. Geim,et al.  Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[7]  Yushen Jin,et al.  Graphene oxide modified PLA microcapsules containing gold nanoparticles for ultrasonic/CT bimodal imaging guided photothermal tumor therapy. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[8]  N. Mei,et al.  Assessment of the toxic potential of graphene family nanomaterials , 2014, Journal of food and drug analysis.

[9]  G. Paradossi,et al.  In vitro contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of capillary microcirculation: comparison between polymer- and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles. , 2011, Ultrasonics.

[10]  A. K. Sood,et al.  Graphene: The New Two‐Dimensional Nanomaterial , 2009 .

[11]  Xin Cai,et al.  Graphene-based contrast agents for photoacoustic and thermoacoustic tomography , 2013, Photoacoustics.

[12]  M. Shur,et al.  Surface acoustic wave response to optical absorption by graphene composite film , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[13]  S. Emelianov,et al.  Photoacoustic imaging in cancer detection, diagnosis, and treatment guidance. , 2011, Trends in biotechnology.

[14]  Nannan Mao,et al.  Graphene: a platform for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. , 2013, Small.

[15]  K. Mak,et al.  Optical spectroscopy of graphene: From the far infrared to the ultraviolet , 2012 .

[16]  Franklin Kim,et al.  Graphene Oxide: Surface Activity and Two‐Dimensional Assembly , 2010, Advanced materials.

[17]  K. Shroyer,et al.  Dose ranging, expanded acute toxicity and safety pharmacology studies for intravenously administered functionalized graphene nanoparticle formulations. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[18]  A. Ferrari,et al.  Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: Disorder, electron phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects , 2007 .

[19]  Kostas Kostarelos,et al.  Tissue distribution and urinary excretion of intravenously administered chemically functionalized graphene oxide sheets , 2015, Chemical science.

[20]  Gang Liu,et al.  Dye-enhanced graphene oxide for photothermal therapy and photoacoustic imaging. , 2013, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[21]  Gang Zheng,et al.  Aggregate enhanced trimodal porphyrin shell microbubbles for ultrasound, photoacoustic, and fluorescence imaging. , 2014, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[22]  Gaio Paradossi,et al.  Stable polymeric microballoons as multifunctional device for biomedical uses: synthesis and characterization. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[23]  S. Emelianov,et al.  Silica-coated gold nanorods as photoacoustic signal nanoamplifiers. , 2011, Nano letters.

[24]  Zhongfan Liu,et al.  Production of graphene sheets by direct dispersion with aromatic healing agents. , 2010, Small.

[25]  Cheol‐Woong Yang,et al.  Thickness contrast of few‐layered graphene in SEM , 2012 .

[26]  S. Licoccia,et al.  "Soft" confinement of graphene in hydrogel matrixes. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[27]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine , 2006 .

[28]  Dan Wu,et al.  Contrast Agents for Photoacoustic and Thermoacoustic Imaging: A Review , 2014, International journal of molecular sciences.

[29]  V. Kravets,et al.  Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy of Graphene , 2010, 1005.3268.

[30]  Kai Yang,et al.  Multimodal Imaging Guided Photothermal Therapy using Functionalized Graphene Nanosheets Anchored with Magnetic Nanoparticles , 2012, Advanced materials.

[31]  Huafeng Yang,et al.  A simple method for graphene production based on exfoliation of graphite in water using 1-pyrenesulfonic acid sodium salt , 2013 .

[32]  Duan Zhang,et al.  The SERS study of graphene deposited by gold nanoparticles with 785 nm excitation , 2013 .

[33]  Stanislav Emelianov,et al.  Enhanced thermal stability of silica-coated gold nanorods for photoacoustic imaging and image-guided therapy , 2010, Optics express.

[34]  Toru Maekawa,et al.  Fluorinated Graphene Oxide; a New Multimodal Material for Biological Applications , 2013, Advanced materials.

[35]  Liang Song,et al.  Protein-assisted fabrication of nano-reduced graphene oxide for combined in vivo photoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[36]  Chulhong Kim,et al.  Methylene blue microbubbles as a model dual-modality contrast agent for ultrasound and activatable photoacoustic imaging , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[37]  J. Coleman,et al.  Liquid phase production of graphene by exfoliation of graphite in surfactant/water solutions , 2008, 0809.2690.

[38]  David W. Johnson,et al.  A manufacturing perspective on graphene dispersions , 2015 .

[39]  Huabei Jiang,et al.  Gold-Speckled Multimodal Nanoparticles for Noninvasive Bioimaging , 2008, Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society.

[40]  Hua Zhang,et al.  25th Anniversary Article: Hybrid Nanostructures Based on Two‐Dimensional Nanomaterials , 2014, Advanced materials.

[41]  P. Beard Biomedical photoacoustic imaging , 2011, Interface Focus.

[42]  Andre K. Geim,et al.  The rise of graphene. , 2007, Nature materials.

[43]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Nanotubes-Embedded Indocyanine Green-Hyaluronic Acid Nanoparticles for Photoacoustic-Imaging-Guided Phototherapy. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[44]  Jin Ho Chang,et al.  Amplified photoacoustic performance and enhanced photothermal stability of reduced graphene oxide coated gold nanorods for sensitive photoacoustic imaging. , 2015, ACS nano.

[45]  Liang Song,et al.  Blind-deconvolution optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy in vivo. , 2013, Optics express.

[46]  Stanislav Emelianov,et al.  Biomedical photoacoustics beyond thermal expansion using triggered nanodroplet vaporization for contrast-enhanced imaging , 2012, Nature Communications.

[47]  Jacob D. Dove,et al.  Enhanced photoacoustic response with plasmonic nanoparticle-templated microbubbles , 2013 .

[48]  N. Kurup,et al.  MICROBUBBLES: A NOVEL DELIVERY SYSTEM , 2010 .

[49]  M. Larsson,et al.  Endocardial border delineation capability of a novel multimodal polymer-shelled contrast agent , 2014, Cardiovascular Ultrasound.

[50]  S. Kaul,et al.  Interactions between microbubbles and ultrasound: in vitro and in vivo observations. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[51]  Dongqing Wu,et al.  Dispersion of Graphene Sheets in Organic Solvent Supported by Ionic Interactions , 2009 .

[52]  Hao Hong,et al.  Graphene: a versatile nanoplatform for biomedical applications. , 2012, Nanoscale.

[53]  Kostas Kostarelos,et al.  Tissue distribution and urinary excretion of intravenously administered chemically functionalized graphene oxide sheets† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c5sc00114e , 2015, Chemical science.

[54]  A. Fery,et al.  Water-dispersible PVA-based dry microballoons with potential for biomedical applications , 2010 .

[55]  J. Tascón,et al.  High-throughput production of pristine graphene in an aqueous dispersion assisted by non-ionic surfactants , 2011 .

[56]  Byung Hee Hong,et al.  Graphene-based nanomaterials for versatile imaging studies. , 2015, Chemical Society reviews.

[57]  P. Mozetic,et al.  Polymer Microbubbles As Diagnostic and Therapeutic Gas Delivery Device , 2008 .

[58]  J. Hossack,et al.  Oscillatory Dynamics and In Vivo Photoacoustic Imaging Performance of Plasmonic Nanoparticle-Coated Microbubbles. , 2015, Small.

[59]  N. Pu,et al.  Dispersion of graphene in aqueous solutions with different types of surfactants and the production of graphene films by spray or drop coating , 2012 .

[60]  Liantuan Xiao,et al.  Modulation of the optical transmittance in monolayer graphene oxide by using external electric field , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[61]  Samuel Y. Mensah,et al.  Generation and Propagation of Ultrasonic Waves in Piezoelectric Graphene Nanoribbon , 2013 .

[62]  Abdullah M. Asiri,et al.  Graphene based materials for biomedical applications , 2013 .

[63]  X. Qin,et al.  Folic acid-conjugated graphene oxide for cancer targeted chemo-photothermal therapy. , 2013, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[64]  J. Coleman,et al.  High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[65]  T. Wakamatsu,et al.  Flotation of graphite , 1991 .

[66]  Huabei Jiang,et al.  Direct production of graphene nanosheets for near infrared photoacoustic imaging. , 2013, ACS nano.

[67]  Chulhong Kim,et al.  Porphyrin shell microbubbles with intrinsic ultrasound and photoacoustic properties. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[68]  N. Pugno,et al.  Graphene-Based Bionic Composites with Multifunctional and Repairing Properties. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[69]  S. Jacques Optical properties of biological tissues: a review , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.