Fluid–structure interaction of water filled tanks during the impact with the ground

Abstract Crashworthiness of subfloor-integrated tank is fundamental for the survivability of an impact with the ground in emergency. In this paper, numerical models for the analysis of the water sloshing in a tank during the impact with the ground have been developed and validated using experimental data. Specific drop tests were carried out using simulacra of a tank integrated in the subfloor of a small dimension helicopter and reproduced in detail using LSTC LS-Dyna. In particular, four different models were developed for the water inside the tank—namely: Finite Element (FE), Eulerian, Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian, and Smoothed Particles Hydrodynamics (SPH) model. Advantages and disadvantages of these models were evaluated and the results show that the FE model of the water is the most feasible for the analysis of the tank structure damages whereas the SPH model of the water, despite the large required CPU time, is the most feasible for the analysis of the sloshing of the water.

[1]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Shock simulation by the particle method SPH , 1983 .

[2]  Eric Markiewicz,et al.  Riveted joint modeling for numerical analysis of airframe crashworthiness , 2001 .

[3]  D. Balsara.  von Neumann stability analysis of smoothed particle hydrodynamics—suggestions for optimal algorithms , 1995 .

[4]  Rade Vignjevic,et al.  A contact algorithm for smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2000 .

[5]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Lagrangian finite element analysis of Newtonian fluid flows , 1998 .

[6]  S. Attaway,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics stability analysis , 1995 .

[7]  H. Saunders,et al.  Finite element procedures in engineering analysis , 1982 .

[8]  S. K. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Finite element analysis of fluid-structure interaction effect on liquid retaining structures due to sloshing , 1996 .

[9]  Franklin D Harris,et al.  U.S. Civil Rotorcraft Accidents, 1963 through 1997 , 2000 .

[10]  Giuseppe Sala,et al.  The Design of Helicopter Crashworthiness , 1988 .

[11]  Jonas A. Zukas,et al.  High velocity impact dynamics , 1990 .

[12]  M Meywerk,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction in crash simulation , 2000 .

[13]  Mohamed S. Gadala,et al.  Formulation and survey of ALE method in nonlinear solid mechanics , 1997 .

[14]  Sivakumar Kulasegaram,et al.  Remarks on tension instability of Eulerian and Lagrangian corrected smooth particle hydrodynamics (CSPH) methods , 2001 .

[15]  Rade Vignjevic,et al.  A treatment of zero-energy modes in the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method , 2000 .

[16]  M. Souli,et al.  ALE formulation for fluid–structure interaction problems , 2000 .

[17]  J. Monaghan.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[18]  M. Souli.  ALE and Fluid-Structure Interaction Capabilities in LS-DYNA , 2002 .

[19]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures , 2000 .

[20]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars , 1977 .

[21]  Charles E. Anderson,et al.  An overview of the theory of hydrocodes , 1987 .

[22]  J. Monaghan.  Simulating Free Surface Flows with SPH , 1994 .

[23]  L. Libersky,et al.  Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: Some recent improvements and applications , 1996 .

[24]  L. Lucy.  A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. , 1977 .

[25]  K. Bathe.  Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[26]  D. Benson.  Computational methods in Lagrangian and Eulerian hydrocodes , 1992 .