Modeling the Complexity of Music Metadata in Semantic Graphs for Exploration and Discovery

Representing and retrieving fine-grained information related to something as complex as music composition, recording and performance is a challenging activity. This complexity requires that the data model enables to describe different outcomes of the creative process, from the writing of the score, to its performance and publishing. In this paper, we show how we design the DOREMUS ontology as an extension of the FRBRoo model in order to represent music metadata coming from different libraries and cultural institutions and how we publish this data as RDF graphs. We designed and re-used several controlled vocabularies that provide common identifiers that overcome the differences in language and alternative forms of needed concepts. These graphs are interlinked to each other and to external resources on the Web of Data. We show how these graphs can be walked through for designing a web-based application providing an exploratory search engine for presenting complex music metadata to the end-user. Finally, we demonstrate how this model and this exploratory application is suitable for answering non-trivial questions collected from experts and is a first step towards a fully fledged recommendation engine.

[1]  Heiko Paulheim,et al.  RDF Graph Embeddings for Content-based Recommender Systems , 2016, CBRecSys@RecSys.

[2]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Data Mining And Knowledge Discovery Handbook , 2005 .

[3]  Raphaël Troncy,et al.  Enabling Linked Data Publication with the Datalift Platform , 2012, Semantic Cities @ AAAI.

[4]  J. Stephen Downie,et al.  A Musical Progression with Greenstone: How Music Content Analysis and Linked Data is Helping Redefine the Boundaries to a Music Digital Library , 2014, DLfM '14.

[5]  Ichiro Fujinaga,et al.  Metadata Infrastructure for Sound Recordings , 2007, ISMIR.

[6]  Markus Nentwig,et al.  A survey of current Link Discovery frameworks , 2016, Semantic Web.

[7]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Clustering Methods , 2005, The Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook.

[8]  Lisa Goddard,et al.  The Strongest Link: Libraries and Linked Data , 2010, D Lib Mag..

[9]  György Fazekas,et al.  Knowledge Representation Issues in Musical Instrument Ontology Design , 2011, ISMIR.

[10]  Getaneh Alemu,et al.  Linked data for libraries: benefits of a conceptual shift from library-specific record structures to RDF-based data models , 2012 .

[11]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Semantic Services, Interoperability and Web Applications - Emerging Concepts , 2011, Semantic Services, Interoperability and Web Applications.

[12]  Konstantin Todorov,et al.  Automatic Key Selection for Data Linking , 2016, EKAW.

[13]  Raphaël Troncy,et al.  Exploring Linked Classical Music Catalogs with OVERTURE , 2016, International Semantic Web Conference.

[14]  Francesco Ricci,et al.  Location-aware music recommendation , 2013, International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval.

[15]  Jeff Z. Pan,et al.  Resource Description Framework , 2020, Definitions.

[16]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[17]  Mark B. Sandler,et al.  A Web of Musical Information , 2008, ISMIR.

[18]  Pierre Choffé DOREMUS : Connecting Sources , Enriching Catalogues and User Experience , 2016 .

[19]  Mark B. Sandler,et al.  The Music Ontology , 2007, ISMIR.

[20]  Alistair Miles,et al.  SKOS: Simple Knowledge Organisation for the Web , 2007 .

[21]  Martin Doerr,et al.  FRBR OO , A CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR PERFORMING ARTS , 2008 .

[22]  Monica M. C. Schraefel,et al.  Integrating Musicology's Heterogeneous Data Sources for Better Exploration , 2009, ISMIR.