Variance in the interpretation of cervical biopsy specimens obtained for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.

We sought to determine whether the variability in dysplasia rates in cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) reflects variability in interpretation of cervical biopsy specimens. In phase 1, 124 biopsy specimens obtained because of a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS were reviewed independently by 5 experienced pathologists. Diagnostic choices were normal, squamous metaplasia, reactive, indeterminate, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). The rate of dysplasia ranged from 23% to 51%. All pathologists agreed in 28% of cases. In 52% of cases, the diagnoses ranged from benign to dysplasia. The overall interobserver agreement was poor. In phase 2, 60 cervical biopsy specimens (21 obtained for ASCUS, 22 for LSIL, and 17 for HSIL) were evaluated using the same diagnostic choices. Agreement was better in biopsies performed for HSIL and LSIL compared to those for ASCUS. Intraobserver reproducibility in the interpretation of biopsies performed for ASCUS ranged from poor to excellent. We conclude that variability in the interpretation of biopsy specimens plays an important role in the differences in rates of dysplasia reported for the follow-up of ASCUS.

[1]  D. Davey,et al.  Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: Interlaboratory comparison and quality assurance monitors , 1994, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[2]  David R. Scott,et al.  Toward objective quality assurance in cervical cytopathology. Correlation of cytopathologic diagnoses with detection of high-risk human papillomavirus types. , 1994, American journal of clinical pathology.

[3]  W. Frable,et al.  Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: Correlative histologic and follow‐up studies from an academic medical center , 1997, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[4]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[5]  J W Arends,et al.  Efforts to improve interobserver agreement in histopathological grading. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  C. Crum,et al.  Nondiagnostic squamous atypia of the cervix (atypical squamous epithelium of undetermined significance): histologic and molecular correlates. , 1994, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[7]  J. Epstein.  How should atypical prostate needle biopsies be reported? Controversies regarding the term "ASAP". , 1999, Human pathology.

[8]  M. Schiffman,et al.  Interim guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cytology. The 1992 National Cancer Institute Workshop. , 1994, JAMA.

[9]  E. Trimble,et al.  Interim Guidelines for Management of Abnormal Cervical Cytology , 1994 .

[10]  R. Katz,et al.  On the Origins of “Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance”: The Evolution of a Diagnostic Term , 1997 .

[11]  J. Robb.  The “ASCUS” swamp , 1994, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[12]  D. Wilbur,et al.  Reactive change and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in papanicolaou smears: A cytohistologic correlation , 1993, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[13]  Diane Solomon,et al.  The Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: revised after the second National Cancer Institute Workshop, April 29-30, 1991. , 1993, Acta cytologica.

[14]  H. D. de Vet,et al.  Sources of interobserver variation in histopathological grading of cervical dysplasia. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  C. Crum,et al.  Qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" affects the predictive value of a squamous intraepithelial lesion on subsequent biopsy. , 1998, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[16]  A J Robertson,et al.  Observer variability in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens. , 1989, Journal of clinical pathology.

[17]  H. D. de Vet,et al.  Interobserver variation in histopathological grading of cervical dysplasia. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  J. Robb,et al.  Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Current laboratory practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory. Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. , 1996, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[19]  Prabodh K. Gupta,et al.  Interobserver variability of cervical smears with squamous‐cell abnormalities: A philadelphia study , 1994, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[20]  D. Wilbur,et al.  Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Stratification of the risk of association with, or progression to, squamous intraepithelial lesions based on morphologic subcategorization. , 1997 .

[21]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  J. Arseneau,et al.  Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic study of 52 cases. , 1997, Acta cytologica.