Unstructured CFD Aerodynamic Analysis of a Generic UCAV Configuration

Three independent studies from the United States (NASA), Sweden (FOI), and Australia (DSTO) are analyzed to assess the state of current unstructured-grid computational fluid dynamic tools and practices for predicting the complex static and dynamic aerodynamic and stability characteristics of a generic 53-degree swept, round-leading-edge uninhabited combat air vehicle configuration, called SACCON. NASA exercised the USM3D tetrahedral cell-centered flow solver, while FOI and DSTO applied the FOI/EDGE general-cell vertex-based solver. The authors primarily employ the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) assumption, with a limited assessment of the EDGE Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) extension, to explore sensitivities to grids and turbulence models. Correlations with experimental data are provided for force and moments, surface pressure, and off-body flow measurements. The vortical flow field over SACCON proved extremely difficult to model adequately. As a general rule, the prospect of obtaining reasonable correlations of SACCON pitching moment characteristics with the RANS formulation is not promising, even for static cases. Yet, dynamic pitch oscillation results seem to produce a promising characterization of shapes for the lift and pitching moment hysteresis curves. Future studies of this configuration should include more investigation with higher-fidelity turbulence models, such as DES.

[1]  Jean-Claude Monnier,et al.  Static and Dynamic SACCON PIV Tests, Part I: Forward Flowfield , 2010 .

[2]  Russell M. Cummings,et al.  An Integrated Computational/Experimental Approach to UCAV Stability & Control Estimation: Overview of NATO RTO AVT-161 , 2010 .

[3]  Paresh Parikh,et al.  The NASA tetrahedral unstructured software system (TetrUSS) , 2000, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[4]  Frank Thiele,et al.  Restatement of the Spalart-Allmaras Eddy-Viscosity Model in Strain-Adaptive Formulation , 2003 .

[5]  Neal T. Frink,et al.  Tetrahedral Unstructured Navier-Stokes Method for Turbulent Flows , 1998 .

[6]  S. Pirzadeh Advanced Unstructured Grid Generation for Complex Aerodynamic Applications , 2013 .

[7]  Ken Badcock,et al.  Validation of Vortical Flow Predictions for a UCAV Wind Tunnel Model , 2010 .

[8]  Stephan M. Hitzel,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Analyses of the Vortical Flow Around the SACCON Configuration , 2010 .

[9]  Samareh Jamshid,et al.  GridTool: A Surface Modeling and Grid Generation , 2022 .

[10]  Shahyar Pirzadeh,et al.  Advanced Unstructured Grid Generation for Complex Aerodynamics Applications , 2008 .

[11]  Andreas Schröder,et al.  Chapter 1 – Static and Dynamic SACCON PIV Tests - Part II: Aft Flow Field , 2010 .

[12]  Russell M. Cummings,et al.  SACCON Static and Dynamic Motion Flow Physics Simulations Using COBALT , 2010 .

[13]  Shahyar Pirzadeh,et al.  Three-dimensional unstructured viscous grids by the advancing-layers method , 1996 .

[14]  Dan D. Vicroy,et al.  SACCON Static Wind Tunnel Tests at DNW-NWB and 14'x22' NASA LaRC , 2010 .

[15]  Neal T. Frink,et al.  Enhancement of USM3D Unstructured Flow Solver for High-Speed High-Temperature Shear Flows , 2009 .

[16]  Arne V. Johansson,et al.  An explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model for incompressible and compressible turbulent flows , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Magnus Tormalm,et al.  Computational Study of Static And Dynamic Vortical Flow over the Delta Wing SACCON Configuration Using the FOI Flow Solver Edge , 2010 .

[18]  S. Morgand,et al.  SACCON CFD Static and Dynamic Derivatives using elsA , 2010 .

[19]  Neal Frink,et al.  Strategy for Dynamic CFD Simulations on SACCON Configuration , 2010 .