Multiscale identification of emergent and future conditions along corridors of transportation networks

Transportation agencies are challenged with managing large-scale networks of roads, spanning geographic areas diverse in terms of jurisdictions, topography, demographics, economy, organizations, and others. Risk management, asset management, and resource allocation must be approached from a holistic perspective without compromising specific regional needs. Agencies collect a large amount of data, the utilization of which should be transparent and consistent with their stated aims. The innovation of this paper is a corridor trace analysis, a method for identifying anomalies of hazard intensity, exposure, and vulnerability along many thousands of kilometers of a transportation network by integrating key road characteristic and performance metrics to straight-line diagrams of corridor sections. Road segments under stress are identified by searching for one or more characteristics that are outliers with respect to the contextual data. The paper includes demonstrations of this method for big-data integration on a real-world system, focusing on how the method is useful to shift among geographic scales. The demonstrations suggest the efficacy of the approach to sustain the efficient, reliable, and safe movement of passengers and freight.

[1]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  Why Cost Benefit Analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: A process perspective , 2012 .

[2]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Integration of Decision Analysis and Scenario Planning for Coastal Engineering and Climate Change , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[3]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Integrated risk management of safety and development on transportation corridors , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Climate and other scenarios disrupt priorities in several management perspectives , 2014, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[5]  W. Botzen,et al.  Combining hazard, exposure and social vulnerability to provide lessons for flood risk management , 2015 .

[6]  Ramesh Sharda,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics , 2015 .

[7]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Resilience Analytics with Application to Power Grid of a Developing Region , 2017, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  John Preston,et al.  Twenty-one sources of error and bias in transport project appraisal , 1998 .

[9]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Climate and Related Uncertainties Influencing Research and Development Priorities , 2015 .

[10]  Grant G Schultz,et al.  Crashes in the Vicinity of Major Crossroads , 2008 .

[11]  Rafael Molina,et al.  Overtopping hazards to port activities: Application of a new methodology to risk management (POrt Risk MAnagement Tool) , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Susana Freiria,et al.  The Multiscale Importance of Road Segments in a Network Disruption Scenario: A Risk‐Based Approach , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  Sybil Derrible,et al.  A geographical and multi-criteria vulnerability assessment of transportation networks against extreme earthquakes , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Quantification of Scenarios and Stakeholders Influencing Priorities for Risk Mitigation in Infrastructure Systems , 2014 .

[15]  Jerome Gluck,et al.  State of the Practice in Highway Access Management , 2010 .

[16]  Kristine M Williams,et al.  Access Management Manual , 2014 .

[17]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Visualization of large data sets for project planning and prioritization on transportation corridors , 2015, 2015 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium.

[18]  Marc Wouters,et al.  Designing a performance measurement system: A case study , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Amit Mitra,et al.  Statistical Quality Control , 2002, Technometrics.

[20]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Prioritizing Infrastructure Investments in Afghanistan with Multiagency Stakeholders and Deep Uncertainty of Emergent Conditions , 2012 .

[21]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Highway Access Safety Program Evaluation with Uncertain Parameters , 2014 .

[22]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Distributed travel time savings of a multiscale transportation access management program , 2013, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[23]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Understanding and managing disaster evacuation on a transportation network. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  H S Levinson,et al.  IMPACTS OF ACCESS MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES , 1999 .

[25]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Runway safety program evaluation with uncertainties of benefits and costs , 2013 .

[26]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Cost-benefit functions for the allocation of security sensors for air contaminants , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Alexandre Oliveira Tavares,et al.  Multidimensional Approach for Tsunami Vulnerability Assessment: Framing the Territorial Impacts in Two Municipalities in Portugal , 2017, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  Handbook of Multicriteria Analysis , 2010 .

[29]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Risk Analysis of Biofuels Industry for Aviation with Scenario‐Based Expert Elicitation , 2015, Syst. Eng..

[30]  P. Peduzzi,et al.  Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: the Disaster Risk Index , 2009 .

[31]  Wolfgang Kron,et al.  Flood Risk = Hazard • Values • Vulnerability , 2005 .

[32]  Junrui Xu,et al.  Risk‐Cost‐Benefit Analysis for Transportation Corridors with Interval Uncertainties of Heterogeneous Data , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[33]  Sai S. Nudurupati,et al.  State of the art literature review on performance measurement , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[34]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Managing change in the delivery of complex projects: Configuration management, asset information and 'big data' , 2016 .