Gyrokinetic simulations of turbulent transport: size scaling and chaotic behaviour

Important steps towards the understanding of turbulent transport have been made with the development of the gyrokinetic framework for describing turbulence and with the emergence of numerical codes able to solve the set of gyrokinetic equations. This paper presents some of the main recent advances in gyrokinetic theory and computing of turbulence. Solving 5D gyrokinetic equations requires state-of-the-art high performance computing techniques involving massively parallel computers and parallel scalable algorithms. The various numerical schemes that have been explored until now, Lagrangian, Eulerian and semi-Lagrangian, each have their advantages and drawbacks. A past controversy regarding the finite size effect (finite ρ∗) in ITG turbulence has now been resolved. It has triggered an intensive benchmarking effort and careful examination of the convergence properties of the different numerical approaches. Now, both Eulerian and Lagrangian global codes are shown to agree and to converge to the flux-tube result in the ρ∗ → 0 limit. It is found, however, that an appropriate treatment of geometrical terms is necessary: inconsistent approximations that are sometimes used can lead to important discrepancies. Turbulent processes are characterized by a chaotic behaviour, often accompanied by bursts and avalanches. Performing ensemble averages of statistically independent simulations, starting from different initial conditions, is presented as a way to assess the intrinsic variability of turbulent fluxes and obtain reliable estimates of the standard deviation. Further developments

[1]  Shinji Tokuda,et al.  Study of ion turbulent transport and profile formations using global gyrokinetic full-f Vlasov simulation , 2009 .

[2]  Z. Lin,et al.  Size scaling of turbulent transport in magnetically confined plasmas. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[3]  Laurent Villard,et al.  Long global gyrokinetic simulations: Source terms and particle noise control , 2008 .

[4]  Laurent Villard,et al.  A global collisionless PIC code in magnetic coordinates , 2007, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[5]  X. Lapillonne,et al.  Local and Global Eulerian Gyrokinetic Simulations of Microturbulence in Realistic Geometry with Applications to the TCV Tokamak , 2010 .

[6]  F. Romanelli,et al.  The radial structure of the ion‐temperature‐gradient‐driven mode , 1993 .

[8]  Laurent Villard,et al.  Gyrokinetic simulations of turbulent transport , 2010 .

[9]  Jeff M. Candy,et al.  The local limit of global gyrokinetic simulations , 2004 .

[10]  R. Waltz,et al.  Velocity-space resolution, entropy production, and upwind dissipation in Eulerian gyrokinetic simulations , 2006 .

[11]  Hideo Sugama,et al.  Transport processes and entropy production in toroidal plasmas with gyrokinetic electromagnetic turbulence , 1996 .

[12]  Laurent Villard,et al.  Quasisteady and steady states in global gyrokinetic particle-in-cell simulations , 2009 .

[13]  R. Hatzky,et al.  Energy conservation in a nonlinear gyrokinetic particle-in-cell code for ion-temperature-gradient-driven modes in θ-pinch geometry , 2002 .

[14]  F. Jenko,et al.  Scale separation between electron and ion thermal transport. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[15]  Virginie Grandgirard,et al.  Large scale dynamics in flux driven gyrokinetic turbulence , 2010 .

[16]  X. Garbet,et al.  Global full-f gyrokinetic simulations of plasma turbulence , 2007 .

[17]  Laurent Villard,et al.  Finite element approach to global gyrokinetic Particle-In-Cell simulations using magnetic coordinates , 1998 .

[18]  Laurent Villard,et al.  Clarifications to the limitations of the s-α equilibrium model for gyrokinetic computations of turbulence , 2009 .

[19]  X. Garbet,et al.  Interplay between gyrokinetic turbulence, flows, and collisions: perspectives on transport and poloidal rotation. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[20]  A. Aydemir.  A unified Monte Carlo interpretation of particle simulations and applications to non-neutral plasmas , 1994 .

[21]  Scott E. Parker,et al.  Coarse-graining phase space in δf particle-in-cell simulations , 2007 .

[22]  T. S. Hahm,et al.  Turbulence spreading and transport scaling in global gyrokinetic particle simulations , 2004 .

[23]  V. Lynch,et al.  Fluctuation-induced flux at the plasma edge in toroidal devices , 1996 .

[24]  X. Garbet,et al.  Computing ITG turbulence with a full-f semi-Lagrangian code , 2008 .

[25]  W. Dorland,et al.  Discrete Particle Noise in Particle-in-Cell Simulations of Plasma Microturbulence , 2005 .

[26]  Neoclassical equilibrium in gyrokinetic simulations , 2009 .

[27]  W. Lee,et al.  Gyrokinetic particle simulation of ion temperature gradient drift instabilities , 1988 .

[28]  R. Waltz,et al.  Action at distance and Bohm scaling of turbulence in tokamaks , 1996 .

[29]  Alain J. Brizard,et al.  Foundations of Nonlinear Gyrokinetic Theory , 2007 .

[30]  Roman Hatzky,et al.  Electromagnetic gyrokinetic PIC simulation with an adjustable control variates method , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[31]  Jeff M. Candy,et al.  The effect of ion-scale dynamics on electron-temperature-gradient turbulence , 2007 .

[32]  Frank Jenko,et al.  Electron temperature gradient driven turbulence , 1999 .

[33]  Yasuhiro Idomura,et al.  Kinetic simulations of turbulent fusion plasmas , 2006 .

[34]  R. Waltz,et al.  Anomalous transport scaling in the DIII-D tokamak matched by supercomputer simulation. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[35]  Frank Jenko,et al.  On the role of numerical dissipation in gyrokinetic Vlasov simulations of plasma microturbulence , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[36]  Frank Jenko,et al.  Characterizing electron temperature gradient turbulence via numerical simulation , 2006 .

[37]  Jeff M. Candy,et al.  Gyrokinetic turbulence simulation of profile shear stabilization and broken gyroBohm scaling , 2002 .

[38]  Charlson C. Kim,et al.  Comparisons and physics basis of tokamak transport models and turbulence simulations , 2000 .

[39]  Hideo Sugama,et al.  Kinetic simulation of a quasisteady state in collisionless ion temperature gradient driven turbulence , 2002 .

[40]  Kim,et al.  Radial structure of high-mode-number toroidal modes in general equilibrium profiles. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[41]  G. Hu,et al.  The role of dissipation in the theory and simulations of homogeneous plasma turbulence, and resolution of the entropy paradox , 1994 .

[42]  Laurent Villard,et al.  Full radius linear and nonlinear gyrokinetic simulations for tokamaks and stellarators: zonal flows, applied E × B flows, trapped electrons and finite beta , 2004 .

[43]  L. Villard,et al.  Avalanchelike bursts in global gyrokinetic simulations , 2009 .

[44]  T. Görler,et al.  Multiscale effects in plasma microturbulence , 2010 .

[45]  F. Jenko,et al.  Gyrokinetic simulation of collisionless trapped-electron mode turbulence , 2005 .

[46]  Laurent Villard,et al.  Nonlinear low noise particle-in-cell simulations of electron temperature gradient driven turbulence , 2007 .