The Relationship Between Native Speaker Judgments of Nonnative Pronunciation and Deviance in Segmentais, Prosody, and Syllable Structure

This study investigated the relationship between experienced SPEAK Test raters' judgments of nonnative pronunciation and actual deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Sixty reading passage speech samples from SPEAK Test tapes of speakers from 11 language groups were rated impressionistically on pronunciation and later analyzed for deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. The deviance found in each area of pronunciation was then correlated with the pronunciation ratings using Pearson correlations and multiple regression. An analysis of the 60 speakers showed that whereas deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure all showed a significant influence on the pronunciation ratings, the prosodic variable proved to have the strongest effect. When separate analyses were done on two language subgroups within the sample, prosody was always found to be significantly related to the global ratings, whereas this was not always true for the other variables investigated.

[1]  S. Fillenbaum,et al.  Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[2]  W. Lambert,et al.  Evaluational reactions to accented English speech. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[3]  B Arthur,et al.  Evaluation Reactions of College Students to Dialect Differences in the English of Mexican-Americans , 1974, Language and speech.

[4]  Ellen Bouchard Ryan,et al.  Evaluative reactions of adolescents toward speakers of standard English and Mexican American accented English. , 1975 .

[5]  Lonna J. Dickerson.  The Learner's Interlanguage as a System of Variable Rules. , 1975 .

[6]  W. E. Dawson,et al.  Scaling of apparent accentedness by magnitude estimation and sensory modality matching , 1975, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[7]  R. Suter,et al.  PREDICTORS OF PRONUNCIATION ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING1 , 1976 .

[8]  E. F. James,et al.  THE ACQUISITION OF PROSODIC FEATURES OF SPEECH USING A SPEECH VISUALIZER , 1976 .

[9]  Miguel A. Carranza,et al.  Reactions Toward Varying Degrees of Accentedness in the Speech of Spanish-English Bilinguals , 1977, Language and speech.

[10]  Robert L. Politzer,et al.  Errors of English Speakers of German As Perceived and Evaluated by German Natives , 1978 .

[11]  John L. D. Clark,et al.  AN EXPLORATION OF SPEAKING PROFICIENCY MEASURES IN THE TOEFL CONTEXT , 1979 .

[12]  E. Purcell,et al.  PREDICTORS OF PRONUNCIATION ACCURACY: A REEXAMINATION , 1980 .

[13]  John L. D. Clark,et al.  The Test of Spoken English as a Measure of Communicative Ability in English-Medium Instructional Settings. TOEFL Research Reports, 7. , 1980 .

[14]  D. Taylor.  NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS AND THE RHYTHM OF ENGLISH , 1981 .

[15]  E. Brennan,et al.  Accent Scaling and Language Attitudes: Reactions to Mexican American English Speech , 1981 .

[16]  Fred R. Eckman.  ON THE NATURALNESS OF INTERLANGUAGE PHONOLOGICAL RULES1 , 1981 .

[17]  Jeannette Ludwig.  Native‐Speaker Judgments of Second‐Language Learners' Efforts at Communication: A Review , 1982 .

[18]  S. Gass,et al.  The comprehensibility of non-native speech , 1982, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[19]  Randa Mulford,et al.  The acquisition of a second language phonology: Interaction of transfer and developmental factors , 1982, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[20]  John A. Bisazza,et al.  THE COMPREHENSIBILITY OF THREE VARIETIES OF ENGLISH FOR COLLEGE STUDENTS IN SEVEN COUNTRIES1 , 1982 .

[21]  Enric Llurda.  Native-speaker Reactions to Nonnative Speech: A Review , 1983 .

[22]  Evelyn P. Altenberg,et al.  Theoretical Implications of an Error Analysis of Second Language Phonology Production. , 1983 .

[23]  Miriam Ebsworth.  Native Reactions to Non-native Speech , 1983 .

[24]  Ellen Bouchard Ryan,et al.  Social Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Native Speaker Evaluations of Non-Native Speech , 1983, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[25]  J. Esling,et al.  Voice Quality Settings and the Teaching of Pronunciation. , 1983 .

[26]  Ellen Broselow,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF TRANSFER IN SECOND LANGUAGE PHONOLOGY , 1984 .

[27]  Evangeline Marlos Varonis,et al.  The Effect Of Familiarity On The Comprehensibility Of Nonnative Speech , 1984 .

[28]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production , 1984 .

[29]  Charlene J. Sato.  PHONOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: ANOTHER LOOK AT INTERLANGUAGE SYLLABLE STRUCTURE , 1984 .

[30]  Barbara D. Hodne.  YET ANOTHER LOOK AT INTERLANGUAGE PHONOLOGY: THE MODIFICATION OF ENGLISH SYLLABLE STRUCTURE BY NATIVE SPEAKERS OF POLISH , 1985 .

[31]  Joan M. Fayer,et al.  Native and Nonnative Judgments of Intelligibility and Irritation , 1987 .

[32]  D. Jamieson,et al.  Intonation in English, French and German: Perception and Production , 1987 .

[33]  K. Koehler,et al.  The Effect of Foreign Accent and Speaking Rate on Native Speaker Comprehension , 1988 .

[34]  Ocke-Schwen Bohn,et al.  An Instrumental Study of Vowel Reduction and Stress Placement in Spanish-Accented English , 1989, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[35]  Xianonan Susan Shen.  ABILITY OF LEARNING THE PROSODY OF AN INTONATIONAL LANGUAGE BY SPEAKERS OF A TONAL LANGUAGE: CHINESE SPEAKERS LEARNING FRENCH PROSODY , 1990 .

[36]  Alan Juffs,et al.  TONE, SYLLABLE STRUCTURE AND INTERLANGUAGE PHONOLOGY: CHINESE LEARNERS' STRESS ERRORS , 1990 .

[37]  Fred R. Eckman.  The Structural Conformity Hypothesis and the Acquisition of Consonant Clusters in the Interlanguage of ESL Learners , 1991, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[38]  Irene Thompson.  Foreign Accents Revisited: The English Pronunciation of Russian Immigrants† , 1991 .