Can Colonic Manometry Studies Be Done on the Day of Colonic Motility Catheter Placement?

Background and Aims: Colonic manometry has been used to assess colonic neuromuscular integrity in pediatric patients with severe constipation unresponsive to standard medical therapy and to tailor their treatment plans. There are presently no available standard protocols for conducting colonic manometry studies. The aim of the present study was to determine whether colonic manometry studies can be conducted on the same day the colonic motility catheters are placed and to compare the effects of inhaled sevoflurane versus intravenous propofol, used during catheter placement, on colonic motility. Methods: Twenty patients, randomized to receive sevoflurane or propofol during catheter placement, underwent colonic manometry on the day of catheter placement as well as the day after. The total motility index (MI), change in MI in response to a meal and bisacodyl, and presence of high-amplitude propagating contractions were compared between the 2 studies for each patient. Results: Ten patients were allocated to sevoflurane and 10 patients to propofol. A total of 8 (80%) patients in the sevoflurane group and 9 (90%) patients in the propofol group had no differences in their studies between days 1 and 2 when the tracings were interpreted manually for gross evidence of high-amplitude propagating contractions and gastrocolonic reflex. Similarly, there was no change in the total MI between studies done on days 1 and 2 in either sevoflurane (978 ± 232 vs 978 ± 184; P = 0.99) or propofol (968 ± 200 vs 1078 ± 227; P = 0.29) group. When comparing change in MI in response to a meal or bisacodyl between the 2 days, there was no statistical difference noted in either group. Conclusions: Colonic manometry studies can be conducted as early as 4 hours following catheter placement with either propofol or sevoflurane used for anesthesia.

[1]  C. Di Lorenzo,et al.  Distention of the colon is associated with initiation of propagated contractions in children , 2009, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[2]  C. Di Lorenzo,et al.  Colonic Manometry Catheter Placement with Primary Fluoroscopic Guidance , 2007, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[3]  M. Türe,et al.  A comparison of the effect on gastric emptying of propofol or dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients: preliminary study , 2006, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[4]  R. Kavlock,et al.  Ambulatory 24-Hour Colonic Manometry in Slow-Transit Constipation , 2004, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[5]  K. Shingu,et al.  Propofol and Midazolam Inhibit Gastric Emptying and Gastrointestinal Transit in Mice , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  L. Fleisher,et al.  Comparison of Recovery Profile After Ambulatory Anesthesia with Propofol, Isoflurane, Sevoflurane and Desflurane: A Systematic Review , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[7]  C. Di Lorenzo,et al.  Is there a role for surgery beyond colonic aganglionosis and anorectal malformations in children with intractable constipation? , 2004, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[8]  C. Lorenzo,et al.  Colonic manometry in children with defecatory disorders: Role in diagnosis and management , 2003, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[9]  C. Di Lorenzo,et al.  Management of Intractable Constipation With Antegrade Enemas in Neurologically Intact Children , 2002, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[10]  M. Sood,et al.  Colonic Diversion for Intractable Constipation in Children: Colonic Manometry Helps Guide Clinical Decisions , 2001, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[11]  W. Chey,et al.  Colonic motility abnormality in patients with irritable bowel syndrome exhibiting abdominal pain and diarrhea , 2000, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[12]  R. Larsen,et al.  A multicenter comparison of isoflurane and propofol as adjuncts to remifentanil-based anesthesia. , 2000, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[13]  J. Croffie,et al.  Constipation in infants and children: evaluation and treatment. A medical position statement of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. , 1999, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[14]  C. Di Lorenzo,et al.  Bisacodyl and high-amplitude-propagating colonic contractions in children. , 1998, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[15]  B. Flourié,et al.  Motor activity recorded in the unprepared colon of healthy humans. , 1995, Gut.

[16]  A. Moffat,et al.  Comparison of two standard techniques of general anaesthesia for day-case cataract surgery. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[17]  E. Faragher,et al.  Recovery after oral surgery with halothane, enflurane, isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia. , 1994, British journal of anaesthesia.

[18]  S. Kalman,et al.  Anaesthetic technique does not influence postoperative bowel function: a comparison of propofol, nitrous oxide and isoflurane , 1992, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[19]  J. Valanne,et al.  Recovery and discharge of patients after long propofol infusion vs isoflurane anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery , 1992, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[20]  G. Bassotti,et al.  Manometric investigation of high-amplitude propagated contractile activity of the human colon. , 1988, The American journal of physiology.

[21]  J. Fitzgerald Constipation in children. , 1987, Pediatrics in review.

[22]  S. Cohen,et al.  Effect of dietary components on gastrocolonic response. , 1980, The American journal of physiology.