Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies

Advances in causal modeling techniques have made it possible for researchers to simultaneously examine theory and measures. However, researchers must use these new techniques appropriately. In addition to dealing with the methodological concerns associated with more traditional methods of analysis, researchers using causal modeling approaches must understand their underlying assumptions and limitations. Most researchers are well equipped with a basic understanding of LISREL‐type models. In contrast, current familiarity with PLS in the strategic management area is low. The current paper reviews four recent studies in the strategic management area which use PLS. The review notes that the technique has been applied inconsistently, and at times inappropriately, and suggests standards for evaluating future PLS applications. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory: , 1982 .

[2]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Structural and competitive determinants of a global integration strategy , 1995 .

[3]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[4]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .

[5]  D. W. Barclay,et al.  The Effects of Organizational Differences and Trust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships , 1997 .

[6]  R. MacCallum,et al.  The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: some practical issues. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[8]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of causal models in marketing research: A review , 1996 .

[9]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[10]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. , 1994 .

[11]  H. Wold.  Systems Analysis by Partial Least Squares , 1983 .

[12]  R. Lennox,et al.  Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .

[13]  H. Wold.  Causal flows with latent variables: Partings of the ways in the light of NIPALS modelling , 1974 .

[14]  Don N. Kleinmuntz,et al.  Factors influencing the use of internal summary evaluations versus external information in choice , 1994 .

[15]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Measuring the unmeasurable , 1985 .

[16]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[17]  Karel Cool,et al.  Business strategy, market structure and risk-return relationships: a structural approach , 1989 .

[18]  C. Fornell,et al.  The cooperative venture formation process: a latent variable structural modeling approach , 1990 .

[19]  George S. Yip,et al.  Exploiting globalization potential: U.S. and japanese strategies , 1994 .

[20]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[21]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Problems in the Measurement of Latent Variables in Structural Equations Causal Models , 1990 .

[22]  R. Bagozzi.  A Prospectus for Theory Construction in Marketing , 1984 .

[23]  Claes Fornell,et al.  A second generation of multivariate analysis , 1982 .

[24]  C. Higgins,et al.  Gender differences in work-family conflict. , 1991 .

[25]  William R. Darden,et al.  Causal Models in Marketing , 1980 .

[26]  Thomas C. Kinnear,et al.  Individual Differences and Marketing Decision Support System Usage and Satisfaction , 1987 .