Temporal dynamics of motion integration for the initiation of tracking eye movements at ultra-short latencies

The perceived direction of a grating moving behind an elongated aperture is biased towards the aperture's long axis. This “barber pole” illusion is a consequence of integrating one-dimensional (1D) or grating and two-dimensional (2D) or terminator motion signals. In humans, we recorded the ocular following responses to this stimulus. Tracking was always initiated at ultra-short latencies (≈ 85 ms) in the direction of grating motion. With elongated apertures, a later component was initiated 15–20 ms later in the direction of the terminator motion signals along the aperture's long axis. Amplitude of the later component was dependent upon the aperture's aspect ratio. Mean tracking direction at the end of the trial (135–175 ms after stimulus onset) was between the directions of the vector sum computed by integrating either terminator motion signals only or both grating and terminator motion signals. Introducing an elongated mask at the center of the “barber pole” did not affect the latency difference between early and later components, indicating that this latency shift was not due to foveal versus peripheral locations of 1D and 2D motion signals. Increasing the size of the foveal mask up to 90% of the stimulus area selectively reduced the strength of the grating motion signals and, consequently, the amplitude of the early component. Conversely, reducing the contrast of, or indenting the aperture's edges, selectively reduced the strength of terminator motion signals and, consequently, the amplitude of the later component. Latencies were never affected by these manipulations. These results tease apart an early component of tracking responses, driven by the grating motion signals and a later component, driven by the line-endings moving at the intersection between grating and aperture's borders. These results support the hypothesis of a parallel processing of 1D and 2D motion signals with different temporal dynamics.

[1]  Journal of the Optical Society of America , 1950, Nature.

[2]  A. Fuchs,et al.  A method for measuring horizontal and vertical eye movement chronically in the monkey. , 1966, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Precise recording of human eye movements , 1975, Vision Research.

[5]  Claude L. Fennema,et al.  Velocity determination in scenes containing several moving objects , 1979 .

[6]  D Marr,et al.  Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control—III. Guessing unpredictable target displacements , 1981, Vision Research.

[8]  Lance M. Optican,et al.  Unix-based multiple-process system, for real-time data acquisition and control , 1982 .

[9]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[10]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  HIPS: Image processing under UNIX. Software and applications , 1984 .

[11]  Ellen C. Hildreth,et al.  Measurement of Visual Motion , 1984 .

[12]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Model of human visual-motion sensing. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  S. Lisberger,et al.  Properties of visual inputs that initiate horizontal smooth pursuit eye movements in monkeys , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  R. M. Steinman,et al.  The need for an eclectic, rather than systems, approach to the study of the primate oculomotor system , 1986, Vision Research.

[15]  F A Miles,et al.  Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. II. Dependence on a prior saccadic eye movement. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. I. Dependence on temporospatial properties of visual input. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  R. Gellman,et al.  Human smooth pursuit: stimulus-dependent responses. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  E. J. Morris,et al.  Visual motion processing and sensory-motor integration for smooth pursuit eye movements. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[19]  G. Sperling,et al.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[20]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The aperture problem—II. Spatial integration of velocity information along contours , 1988, Vision Research.

[21]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Motion: the long and short of it. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[22]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[23]  F A Miles,et al.  Short latency ocular-following responses in man , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[24]  F A Miles,et al.  Ocular responses to translation and their dependence on viewing distance. II. Motion of the scene. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  B Moulden,et al.  Spatial Gating Effects on Judged Motion of Gratings in Apertures , 1992, Perception.

[26]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  The influence of terminators on motion integration across space , 1992, Vision Research.

[27]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[28]  T D Albright,et al.  Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex. , 1992, Science.

[29]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Perceived direction of moving two-dimensional patterns depends on duration, contrast and eccentricity , 1992, Vision Research.

[30]  F. Kooi.  Local direction of edge motion causes and abolishes the barberpole illusion , 1993, Vision Research.

[31]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Dynamics of orientation coding in area V1 of the awake primate , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[32]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[33]  A. Derrington,et al.  Discriminating the direction of second-order motion at short stimulus durations , 1993, Vision Research.

[34]  S. Yamane,et al.  Neural activity in cortical area MST of alert monkey during ocular following responses. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  Motion integration across differing image features , 1995, Vision Research.

[36]  Mercedes Barchilon Ben-Av,et al.  Disambiguating velocity estimates across image space , 1995, Vision Research.

[37]  Anthony J. Movshon,et al.  Visual Response Properties of Striate Cortical Neurons Projecting to Area MT in Macaque Monkeys , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  E. G. Keating,et al.  Ablation of the pursuit area in the frontal cortex of the primate degrades foveal but not optokinetic smooth eye movements. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  W T Newsome,et al.  How Is a Sensory Map Read Out? Effects of Microstimulation in Visual Area MT on Saccades and Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Johannes M. Zanker,et al.  Smooth-pursuit eye movements elicited by first-order and second-order motion , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  D. R MESTRE,et al.  Ocular Responses to Motion Parallax Stimuli: The Role of Perceptual and Attentional Factors , 1997, Vision Research.

[42]  B L Anderson,et al.  Reciprocal interactions between occlusion and motion computations. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  S G Lisberger,et al.  Vector Averaging for Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements Initiated by Two Moving Targets in Monkeys , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  S. Wuerger,et al.  Perception of Moving Lines: Interactions Between Local Perpendicular Signals and 2D Motion Signals , 1997, Vision Research.

[45]  P. Lennie.  Single Units and Visual Cortical Organization , 1998, Perception.

[46]  S. Watamaniuk,et al.  Spatial integration in human smooth pursuit , 1998, Vision Research.

[47]  P. Benson,et al.  Involuntary eye movements in response to first‐ and second‐order motion , 1998, Neuroreport.

[48]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT , 1998, Vision Research.

[49]  L. P. O'Keefe,et al.  Processing of first- and second-order motion signals by neurons in area MT of the macaque monkey , 1998, Visual Neuroscience.

[50]  F A Miles,et al.  The neural processing of 3‐D visual information: evidence from eye movements , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[51]  P. Knox,et al.  Contrast modification of smooth-pursuit latency , 1998 .

[52]  Brent R. Beutter,et al.  Human motion perception and smooth eye movements slow similar directional biases for elongated apertures , 1998, Vision Research.

[53]  C. Baker,et al.  Temporal and spatial response to second-order stimuli in cat area 18. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  Guillaume S. Masson,et al.  A look into the black box : eye movements as a probe of visual motion processing , 1998 .

[55]  Stephen J Heinen,et al.  Human smooth pursuit direction discrimination , 1999, Vision Research.

[56]  Kenji Kawano,et al.  Ocular tracking: behavior and neurophysiology , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[57]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Non-Fourier Cortical Processes in Texture, Form, and Motion Perception , 1999 .

[58]  C. Baker.  Central neural mechanisms for detecting second-order motion , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[59]  P J Benson,et al.  Stages in motion processing revealed by the ocular following response. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[60]  G. Löffler,et al.  Computing feature motion without feature detectors: A model for terminator motion without end-stopped cells 1 This research was first reported at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, May 1997. 1 , 1999, Vision Research.

[61]  Maninder K. Kahlon,et al.  Visual Motion Analysis for Pursuit Eye Movements in Area MT of Macaque Monkeys , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[62]  R. Krauzlis,et al.  Tracking with the mind’s eye , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.