Social Coordination for Looking-Together Situations

People engage in social coordination without explicitly communicating when they are conflicting over spatial resources, e.g., a shop clerk who yields to customers the best place to view products. In this study, we proposed a method that achieves such social coordination with a robot. Our idea is that the social coordination between two agents can be represented as utility-maximizing behavior for joint utility rather than just by a single agent utility. That is, given that each agent's reasonable behavior can be represented as utility-maximizing behavior for single agent utility, we model each agent's plans for himself as well as for the partner agent. Moreover, superiority relationships exist in this joint-utility computation. Since each agent knows such superiority relationships, social coordination can be modeled as utility-yielding behavior based on informed superiority. We specifically focus on looking-together situations for which we developed a utility model. With simulations, we investigate whether the above joint-utility-based modeling successfully reproduces social coordination in looking-together situations. We conducted an experiment in a situation where a tele-operated robot and a customer together look at products in a shop environment. Our experimental results show that our proposed method enables the robot to socially coordinate spatial resources, yielding significantly more thoughtful, less-self-centered, and appropriate impressions than the alternate robot.

[1]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Are Robots Appropriate for Troublesome and Communicative Tasks in a City Environment? , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[3]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Measuring Communication Participation to Initiate Conversation in Human–Robot Interaction , 2015, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[4]  Grahame F. Thompson,et al.  Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life , 1991 .

[5]  W. Burgard,et al.  Markov Localization for Mobile Robots in Dynamic Environments , 1999, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[6]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Escaping from Children’s Abuse of Social Robots , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[7]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Simulation of pedestrian flows by optimal control and differential games , 2003 .

[8]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Simulation-Based Behavior Planning to Prevent Congestion of Pedestrians Around a Robot , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[9]  Nicholas Roy,et al.  Assisted Teleoperation Strategies for Aggressively Controlling a Robot Arm with 2D Input , 2012 .

[10]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Building a Model of the Environment from a Route Perspective for Human–Robot Interaction , 2015, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[11]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Experiences with an Interactive Museum Tour-Guide Robot , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[12]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Yiannis Demiris,et al.  Perceptual Perspective Taking and Action Recognition , 2005 .

[14]  Nick Chater,et al.  Virtual bargaining: a theory of social decision-making , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  Perspective Taking: An Organizing Principle for Learning in Human-Robot Interaction , 2006, AAAI.

[16]  B. Argall,et al.  Human-in-the-Loop Optimization of Shared Autonomy in Assistive Robotics , 2017, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[17]  Norihiro Hagita,et al.  Social Common Sense Modeling of a Spread-out Queue in Public Space for a Service Robot , 2017, HRI.

[18]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Enabling effective human-robot interaction using perspective-taking in robots , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[19]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  The mobot museum robot installations: a five year experiment , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[20]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  The dynamic window approach to collision avoidance , 1997, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[21]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Time dependent planning on a layered social cost map for human-aware robot navigation , 2015, 2015 European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR).

[22]  Gillian Ku,et al.  Perspective-Taking and Self-Other Overlap: Fostering Social Bonds and Facilitating Social Coordination , 2005 .

[23]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Walking together , 2012, HRI 2014.

[24]  N. Chater,et al.  Unwritten rules: virtual bargaining underpins social interaction, culture, and society , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  A. Morton Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together , 2015 .

[26]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Destination Unknown: Walking Side-by-Side without Knowing the Goal , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[27]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  A Model of Proximity Control for Information-Presenting Robots , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[28]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Human-Robot Mutual Adaptation in Shared Autonomy , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[29]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[30]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement , 2000 .