Integrated molecular profiles of invasive breast tumors and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) reveal differential vascular and interleukin signaling

We use an integrated approach to understand breast cancer heterogeneity by modeling mRNA, copy number alterations, microRNAs, and methylation in a pathway context utilizing the pathway recognition algorithm using data integration on genomic models (PARADIGM). We demonstrate that combining mRNA expression and DNA copy number classified the patients in groups that provide the best predictive value with respect to prognosis and identified key molecular and stromal signatures. A chronic inflammatory signature, which promotes the development and/or progression of various epithelial tumors, is uniformly present in all breast cancers. We further demonstrate that within the adaptive immune lineage, the strongest predictor of good outcome is the acquisition of a gene signature that favors a high T-helper 1 (Th1)/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response at the expense of Th2-driven humoral immunity. Patients who have breast cancer with a basal HER2-negative molecular profile (PDGM2) are characterized by high expression of protumorigenic Th2/humoral-related genes (24–38%) and a low Th1/Th2 ratio. The luminal molecular subtypes are again differentiated by low or high FOXM1 and ERBB4 signaling. We show that the interleukin signaling profiles observed in invasive cancers are absent or weakly expressed in healthy tissue but already prominent in ductal carcinoma in situ, together with ECM and cell-cell adhesion regulating pathways. The most prominent difference between low and high mammographic density in healthy breast tissue by PARADIGM was that of STAT4 signaling. In conclusion, by means of a pathway-based modeling methodology (PARADIGM) integrating different layers of molecular data from whole-tumor samples, we demonstrate that we can stratify immune signatures that predict patient survival.

[1]  I. Fentiman,et al.  Inflammation and breast cancer , 2013 .

[2]  C. Coutant,et al.  In situ immune response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer predicts survival , 2011, The Journal of pathology.

[3]  C. Lewis,et al.  Cancer: Macrophages limit chemotherapy , 2011, Nature.

[4]  S. Loi,et al.  Anti–ErbB-2 mAb therapy requires type I and II interferons and synergizes with anti–PD-1 or anti-CD137 mAb therapy , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Israel Steinfeld,et al.  miRNA-mRNA Integrated Analysis Reveals Roles for miRNAs in Primary Breast Tumors , 2011, PloS one.

[6]  Vessela Kristensen,et al.  Methylation profiling with a panel of cancer related genes: Association with estrogen receptor, TP53 mutation status and expression subtypes in sporadic breast cancer , 2011, Molecular oncology.

[7]  B. Vincenzi,et al.  New perspectives: role of Sunitinib in breast cancer. , 2011, La Clinica terapeutica.

[8]  M. Teh,et al.  Induction of human epithelial stem/progenitor expansion by FOXM1. , 2010, Cancer research.

[9]  T. Pawson,et al.  Receptor tyrosine kinase signaling favors a protumorigenic state in breast cancer cells by inhibiting the adaptive immune response. , 2010, Cancer research.

[10]  C. Perou,et al.  Allele-specific copy number analysis of tumors , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  W. Jonat,et al.  In vitro effects of imatinib mesylate on radiosensitivity and chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells , 2010, BMC Cancer.

[12]  T. Sørlie,et al.  Molecular diversity in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and early invasive breast cancer , 2010, Molecular oncology.

[13]  David Haussler,et al.  Inference of patient-specific pathway activities from multi-dimensional cancer genomics data using PARADIGM , 2010, Bioinform..

[14]  M. Karin,et al.  Immunity, Inflammation, and Cancer , 2010, Cell.

[15]  D. McDonald,et al.  Complementary actions of inhibitors of angiopoietin-2 and VEGF on tumor angiogenesis and growth. , 2010, Cancer research.

[16]  M. Teh,et al.  Upregulation of FOXM1 induces genomic instability in human epidermal keratinocytes , 2010, Molecular Cancer.

[17]  M. Grever,et al.  A phase I trial of paclitaxel and trastuzumab in combination with interleukin-12 in patients with HER2/neu-expressing malignancies , 2009, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[18]  L. Coussens,et al.  CD4(+) T cells regulate pulmonary metastasis of mammary carcinomas by enhancing protumor properties of macrophages. , 2009, Cancer cell.

[19]  D. Fearon,et al.  Secondary Replicative Function of CD8+ T Cells That Had Developed an Effector Phenotype , 2009, Science.

[20]  Kenneth H. Buetow,et al.  PID: the Pathway Interaction Database , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  Sami Kilpinen,et al.  Role of ErbB4 in Breast Cancer , 2008, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[22]  F. Pépin,et al.  Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer , 2008, Nature Medicine.

[23]  T. Sørlie,et al.  Extracellular matrix signature identifies breast cancer subgroups with different clinical outcome , 2008, The Journal of pathology.

[24]  D. Munn,et al.  Creating immune privilege: active local suppression that benefits friends, but protects foes , 2008, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[25]  J. Pollard,et al.  Vascular endothelial growth factor restores delayed tumor progression in tumors depleted of macrophages , 2007, Molecular oncology.

[26]  V. Sukhatme,et al.  Activation of the orphan endothelial receptor Tie1 modifies Tie2‐mediated intracellular signaling and cell survival , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[27]  Therese Sørlie,et al.  Presence of bone marrow micrometastasis is associated with different recurrence risk within molecular subtypes of breast cancer , 2007, Molecular oncology.

[28]  L. Coussens,et al.  Inflammation and breast cancer. Balancing immune response: crosstalk between adaptive and innate immune cells during breast cancer progression , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[29]  J. Pollard,et al.  Tumor-associated macrophages press the angiogenic switch in breast cancer. , 2007, Cancer research.

[30]  C Caldas,et al.  Using array-comparative genomic hybridization to define molecular portraits of primary breast cancers , 2007, Oncogene.

[31]  Lisa M. Coussens,et al.  Balancing immune response: crosstalk between adaptive and innate immune cells during breast cancer progression , 2007 .

[32]  Stephen B Fox,et al.  Quantification of regulatory T cells enables the identification of high-risk breast cancer patients and those at risk of late relapse. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  Robert D. Schreiber,et al.  Interferons, immunity and cancer immunoediting , 2006, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[34]  L. Coussens,et al.  The inflammatory tumor microenvironment and its impact on cancer development. , 2006, Contributions to microbiology.

[35]  L. Coussens,et al.  Paradoxical roles of the immune system during cancer development , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[36]  M. Follettie,et al.  Loss of the forkhead transcription factor FoxM1 causes centrosome amplification and mitotic catastrophe. , 2005, Cancer research.

[37]  L. Coussens,et al.  De novo carcinogenesis promoted by chronic inflammation is B lymphocyte dependent. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[38]  Hans Clevers,et al.  FoxM1 is required for execution of the mitotic programme and chromosome stability , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[39]  Mark J. van der Laan,et al.  A new algorithm for hybrid hierarchical clustering with visualization and the bootstrap , 2003 .

[40]  G Kvalheim,et al.  Detection of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  D. Yee,et al.  STAT6 mediates interleukin-4 growth inhibition in human breast cancer cells. , 2002, Neoplasia.

[42]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.