A comparison of primary stakeholders'views on the deployment of biometric technologies in border management: Case study of SMart mobILity at the European land borders

Abstract Advances in technology have a substantial impact on every aspect of our lives, ranging from the way we communicate to the way we travel. The Smart mobility at the European land borders (SMILE) project is geared towards the deployment of biometric technologies to optimize and monitor the flow of people at land borders. However, despite the anticipated benefits of deploying biometric technologies in border control, there are still divergent views on the use of such technologies by two primary stakeholders–travelers and border authorities. In this paper, we provide a comparison of travelers' and border authorities' views on the deployment of biometric technologies in border management. The overall goal of this study is to enable us to understand the concerns of travelers and border guards in order to facilitate the acceptance of biometric technologies for a secure and more convenient border crossing. Our method of inquiry consisted of in-person interviews with border guards (SMILE project's end users), observation and field visits (to the Hungarian-Romanian and Bulgarian-Romanian borders) and questionnaires for both travelers and border guards. As a result of our investigation, two conflicting trends emerged. On one hand, border guards argued that biometric technologies had the potential to be a very effective tool that would enhance security levels and make traveler identification and authentication procedures easy, fast and convenient. On the other hand, travelers were more concerned about the technologies representing a threat to fundamental rights, personal privacy and data protection.

[1]  Vincenzo Piuri,et al.  Biometric Recognition in Automated Border Control , 2016, ACM Comput. Surv..

[2]  Shui Yu,et al.  Big Privacy: Challenges and Opportunities of Privacy Study in the Age of Big Data , 2016, IEEE Access.

[3]  Jeremy Wickins,et al.  The ethics of biometrics: the risk of social exclusion from the widespread use of electronic identification , 2007, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[4]  Ilker Etikan,et al.  Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling , 2016 .

[5]  J. Hathaway.  The Movement of persons across borders , 1994, American Journal of International Law.

[6]  Neil Robinson,et al.  Information Security and Data Protection Legal and Policy Frameworks Applicable to European Union Institutions and Agencies , 2014 .

[7]  E. Mordini,et al.  Body, Biometrics and Identity , 2008, Bioethics.

[8]  Rapport DU Capscaafrica,et al.  INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION , 1947, International Organization.

[9]  R. Emerson,et al.  Convenience Sampling, Random Sampling, and Snowball Sampling: How Does Sampling Affect the Validity of Research? , 2015 .

[10]  Nasir D. Memon.  How Biometric Authentication Poses New Challenges to Our Security and Privacy [In the Spotlight] , 2017, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[11]  Sule Yildirim Yayilgan,et al.  Border Control and Use of Biometrics: Reasons Why the Right to Privacy Can Not Be Absolute , 2019, Privacy and Identity Management.

[12]  Angus Willoughby.  Biometric Surveillance and the Right to Privacy [Commentary] , 2017, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[13]  Paul Voigt,et al.  The Eu General Data Protection Regulation (Gdpr): A Practical Guide , 2017 .

[14]  David A. Wagner,et al.  Security and Privacy Issues in E-passports , 2005, First International Conference on Security and Privacy for Emerging Areas in Communications Networks (SECURECOMM'05).

[15]  Albert Y. Zomaya,et al.  A Survey of Mobile Device Virtualization , 2016, ACM Comput. Surv..

[16]  A.C.J. Sprokkereef,et al.  ETHICAL PRACTICE IN THE USE OF BIOMETRIC IDENTIFIERS WITHIN THE EU , 2007 .

[17]  Daniela Moctezuma,et al.  Automated border control e-gates and facial recognition systems , 2016, Comput. Secur..

[18]  M. Goddard.  The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): European Regulation that has a Global Impact , 2017 .

[19]  Paul De Hert.  Biometrics and the Challenge to Human Rights in Europe. Need for Regulation and Regulatory Distinctions , 2013, Security and Privacy in Biometrics.

[20]  Paul Voigt,et al.  The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) , 2017 .

[21]  Margit Sutrop,et al.  Ethical Issues in Governing Biometric Technologies , 2010, ICEB.

[22]  Pami Aalto,et al.  Smart and secure borders through automated border control systems in the EU? The views of political stakeholders in the Member States , 2017 .

[23]  Sule Yildirim Yayilgan,et al.  How to Do It Right: A Framework for Biometrics Supported Border Control , 2019, e-Democracy.