How quickly should communication robots respond?

This paper reports a study about system response time (SRT) in communication robots that utilize human-like social features, such as anthropomorphic appearance and conversation in natural language. Our research purpose established a design guideline for SRT in communication robots. The first experiment observed user preferences toward different SRTs in interaction with a robot. In other existing user interfaces, faster response is usually preferred. In contrast, our experimental result indicated that user preference for SRT in a communication robot is highest at one second, and user preference ratings level off at two seconds. However, a robot cannot always respond in such a short time as one or two seconds. Thus, the important question is “What should a robot do if it cannot respond quickly enough?” The second experiment tested the effectiveness of a conversational filler: behavior to notify listeners that the robot is going to respond. In Japanese “etto” is used to buy time to think and resembles “well...” and “uh...” In English. We used the same strategy in a communication robot to shadow system response time. Our results indicated that using a conversational filler by the robot moderated the user's impression toward a long SRT.

[1]  Robert B. Miller,et al.  Response time in man-computer conversational transactions , 1899, AFIPS Fall Joint Computing Conference.

[2]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  System response time operator productivity, and job satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[3]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  A humanoid robot that pretends to listen to route guidance from a human , 2007, Auton. Robots.

[4]  Tomio Watanabe,et al.  Analysis by synthesis of the timing of utterance to communicative actions on greeting embodied interaction , 2003, SICE 2003 Annual Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8734).

[5]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Planning and the user interface: the effects of lockout time and error recovery cost , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Ieee Ro-Man.  9th IEEE International Workshop on ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION , 2000 .

[7]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  Development and evaluation of interactive humanoid robots , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  A. Green,et al.  Applying the Wizard-of-Oz framework to cooperative service discovery and configuration , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[9]  B. Shneiderman.  Designing the User Interface (3rd Ed.) , 1998 .

[10]  Jan L. Guynes.  Impact of system response time on state anxiety , 1988, CACM.

[11]  George Forman,et al.  An Extensive Empirical Study of Feature Selection Metrics for Text Classification , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[12]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Preliminary Field Trial for Teleoperated Communication Robots , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[13]  Thomas J. Goodman,et al.  The effect of System Response Time on interactive computer aided problem solving , 1978, SIGGRAPH.

[14]  Thad Starner.  The Challenges of Wearable Computing: Part 2 , 2001, IEEE Micro.