Since testability physical verification has many shortcomings, such as high risk, difficulty in fault injection, long verification period, high verification cost and so on. Testability nonphysical verification acquires more and more attentions. While most of the traditional testability evaluation models can only describe the relationship of signals, faults and tests qualitatively, they have little quantitative information and this may cause significant deviation between verification result and the real one. So after doing research on the requirements of verification evaluation to virtual Prototypes, a testability evaluation modeling techniques was proposed based on Modelica in this work and the Function-Structure-Fault-Test-Circumstance Model was also defined and described mathematically herein. Additionally, a testability evaluation model of a data collector was built in this paper. By comparing the numerical result with that of the testability physical verification, the following conclusion can be obtained: With sufficient modeling information, testability evaluation model can be built accurately by using the method put forward in this paper.
[1]
Johanna Wallén.
Modelling of Components for Conventional Car and Hybrid Electric Vehicle in Modelica
,
2004
.
[2]
Borut Zupancic,et al.
Some Aspects of Thermal and Radiation Flows Modelling in Buildings Using Modelica
,
2008,
Tenth International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation (uksim 2008).
[3]
Yang Peng.
Integrated Function-Fault-Behavior-Test-Environment Model for Virtual Testability Verification
,
2012
.
[4]
Edwards Afb,et al.
Accreditation of Modeling and Simulation Test Capabilities for CV-22 Initial Operational Test and Evaluation
,
2010
.
[5]
Jianhui Luo,et al.
Distributed Fault Diagnosis Using Dependency Modeling without Revealing Subsystem Details
,
2008,
2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference.