Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices

This study assesses whether Facebook users have different ‘connection strategies,’ a term which describes a suite of Facebook-related relational communication activities, and explores the relationship between these connection strategies and social capital. Survey data (N = 450) from a random sample of undergraduate students reveal that only social information-seeking behaviors contribute to perceptions of social capital; connection strategies that focus on strangers or close friends do not. We also find that reporting more ‘actual’ friends on the site is predictive of social capital, but only to a point. We believe the explanation for these findings may be that the identity information in Facebook serves as a social lubricant, encouraging individuals to convert latent to weak ties and enabling them to broadcast requests for support or information.

[1]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  On and Off the 'Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[3]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[4]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[5]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[6]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Trust and Privacy Concern Within Social Networking Sites: A Comparison of Facebook and MySpace , 2007, AMCIS.

[8]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[9]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Strength of Internet Ties, The , 2006 .

[10]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Rhythms of social interaction: messaging within a massive online network , 2006, ArXiv.

[12]  Stephanie M. Reich,et al.  Online and Offline Social Networks: Use of Social Networking Sites by Emerging Adults , 2008 .

[13]  Nan Lin,et al.  Social Capital: Theories of Capital , 2001 .

[14]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Social networks and Internet connectivity effects , 2005 .

[15]  E. Hargittai.  The Digital Reproduction of Inequality , 2008 .

[16]  D. Hindman.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[17]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation 1 , 2009 .

[18]  D. J. Lee.  Society and the Adolescent Self-Image , 1969 .

[19]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network , 2007, CHI.

[20]  Patricia E. Tweet.  Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .

[21]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[22]  Hikaru Matsuda.  Toward a new era , 2005, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[23]  Judith Donath,et al.  Signals in Social Supernets , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[25]  S. Kiesler,et al.  EFFECTS OF INTERNET USE AND SOCIAL RESOURCES ON CHANGES IN DEPRESSION , 2008 .

[26]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Social network activity and social well-being , 2010, CHI.

[27]  Minou Ella Mebane,et al.  Virtual communities in schools as tools to promote social capital with high schools students , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[28]  M. Huysman,et al.  How Does the Internet Affect Social Capital , 2004 .

[29]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[30]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook , 2008, CHI.

[31]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Changes in use and perception of facebook , 2008, CSCW.

[32]  Scott Counts,et al.  Thin Slices of Online Profile Attributes , 2021, ICWSM.

[33]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing , 2006, CSCW '06.

[34]  M. Rosenberg.  Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Rev. ed. , 1989 .

[35]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[36]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[37]  J. Richardson.  Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education , 1986 .

[38]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  Steven L. Puller,et al.  The Old Boy (and Girl) Network: Social Network Formation on University Campuses , 2008 .

[40]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Friends, Friendsters, and Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites , 2006, First Monday.

[41]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  --Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration : Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work , 2001 .

[42]  N. Lin.  Buidling a Network Theory of Social Capital , 1999, Connections.

[43]  N. Ellison,et al.  Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis , 2008 .

[44]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? , 1999, Oper. Res..

[45]  D. Sommers,et al.  A longitudinal analysis , 1992 .