Referential choice across the lifespan: why children and elderly adults produce ambiguous pronouns
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Anna L. Theakston,et al. Pronoun co-referencing errors: Challenges for generativist and usage-based accounts , 2009 .
[2] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. Reference production in young speakers with and without autism: Effects of discourse status and processing constraints , 2009, Cognition.
[3] P Brooks,et al. Factors affecting young children's use of pronouns as referring expressions. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[4] N. Epley,et al. Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention , 2010 .
[5] Annette Karmiloff-Smith,et al. Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective , 1985 .
[6] M. Hickmann,et al. Cohesion and anaphora in children's narratives: a comparison of English, French, German, and Mandarin Chinese , 1999, Journal of Child Language.
[7] Boaz Keysar,et al. Less Is More: A Minimalist Account of Joint Action in Communication , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[8] Noam Chomsky,et al. वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .
[9] Kersti Börjars,et al. Non-Transformational Syntax: Formal and Explicit Models of Grammar , 2011 .
[10] M. Gernsbacher,et al. Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.
[11] Jennifer Spenader,et al. Coherent discourse solves the pronoun interpretation problem* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.
[12] Mira Ariel. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents , 1990 .
[13] J. Grimshaw,et al. Knowledge and Obedience: The Developmental Status of the Binding Theory , 1990 .
[14] Janet L. Capps,et al. Comprehension of pronouns in young and older adults. , 1986 .
[15] M. Walker,et al. Centering Theory in Discourse , 1998 .
[16] E. Prince. The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-status , 1992 .
[17] P. Hendriks,et al. When Production Precedes Comprehension: An Optimization Approach to the Acquisition of Pronouns , 2006 .
[18] Chien Yu-Chin,et al. Children's Knowledge of Locality Conditions in Binding as Evidence for the Modularity of Syntax and Pragmatics , 1990 .
[19] Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al. The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking , 2000, Cognition.
[20] Jane Grimsahw. Knwoledge and obedience: the developmental status of the binding theory , 1990 .
[21] Carl Pollard,et al. A Centering Approach to Pronouns , 1987, ACL.
[22] F. Craik,et al. The handbook of aging and cognition , 1992 .
[23] Michael W. Pratt,et al. Telling tales: Aging, working memory, and the narrative cohesion of story retellings. , 1989 .
[24] Cornelia Hamann,et al. Production-Comprehension Asymmetries in Child Language , 2011 .
[25] G. Dell,et al. Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.
[26] Petra Hendriks,et al. Learning to reason about speakers' alternatives in sentence comprehension: A computational account , 2007 .
[27] Petra Hendriks,et al. Comprehension and production of subject pronouns : Evidence for the asymmetry of grammar , 2005 .
[28] Helen de Hoop,et al. Children's Optimal Interpretations of Indefinite Subjects and Objects , 2006 .
[29] Petra Hendriks,et al. Age Differences in Adults’ Use of Referring Expressions , 2008, J. Log. Lang. Inf..
[30] Reinhard Blutner,et al. Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation , 2000, J. Semant..
[31] Edward Gibson,et al. The Processing and Acquisition of Reference , 2011 .
[32] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Why Do Alzheimer Patients Have Difficulty with Pronouns? Working Memory, Semantics, and Reference in Comprehension and Production in Alzheimer's Disease , 1999, Brain and Language.
[33] Jennifer E. Arnold. RUNNING HEAD : AVOIDING ATTACHMENT AMBIGUITIES Avoiding Attachment Ambiguities : the Role of Constituent Ordering , 2004 .
[34] Michael P. Cannito,et al. Disruption of reference in aging , 1986, Brain and Language.
[35] John C. Trueswell,et al. Investigating the Interpretation of Pronouns and Demonstratives in Finnish , 2011 .
[36] D. B. Mitchell,et al. The handbook of aging and cognition , 2001 .
[37] S. Thompson,et al. Discourse description : diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text , 1992 .
[38] A Wingfield,et al. Speech-processing capacity in young and older adults: a dual-task study. , 1991, Psychology and aging.
[39] Jill de Villiers,et al. Asymmetries in the acquisition of definite and indefinite NPs , 2010 .
[40] C. Fisher,et al. Who’s “she”? Discourse prominence influences preschoolers’ comprehension of pronouns☆ , 2005 .
[41] Michael J Cortese,et al. Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .
[42] Lori E. James,et al. Theoretical approaches to language and aging. , 2000 .
[43] R. Gonzalez. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 2003 .
[44] Optimal communication (paperback edition) , 2006 .
[45] Sergio Carlomagno,et al. Age-related Differences in the Production of Textual Descriptions , 2005, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[46] K. Ehrlich,et al. Comprehension of Pronouns , 1980 .
[47] Jacolien van Rij,et al. WM Load Influences the Interpretation of Referring Expressions , 2011, CMCL@ACL.
[48] W. Chafe. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .
[49] Thomas Wasow,et al. Performance‐Compatible Competence Grammar , 2011 .
[50] Petra Hendriks,et al. Cognitive architectures and language acquisition: a case study in pronoun comprehension. , 2010, Journal of child language.
[51] S. Morris,et al. OPTIMAL COMMUNICATION , 2005 .
[52] B. Keysar,et al. When do speakers take into account common ground? , 1996, Cognition.
[53] D. Barr. Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground , 2008, Cognition.
[54] Scott Weinstein,et al. Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.
[55] Michael Tomasello,et al. Young children's sensitivity to listener knowledge and perceptual context in choosing referring expressions , 2005, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[56] Mathias Beike,et al. Errors In Anaphora Acquisition , 2016 .
[57] Siobhan Chapman. Logic and Conversation , 2005 .
[58] Petra Hendriks,et al. Production/comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition , 2010 .
[59] Jennifer E. Arnold. Reference form and discourse patterns , 1998 .
[60] ● Pytorch,et al. Attention! , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[61] Gillian Cohen,et al. Language comprehension in old age , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.
[62] Cécile De Cat,et al. Information tracking and encoding in early L1: linguistic competence vs. cognitive limitations* , 2011, Journal of Child Language.
[63] T. Givón. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction , 1983 .
[64] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes , 2008 .
[65] Noam Chomsky,et al. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. , 1966 .
[66] P. Smolensky. On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language , 1996 .
[67] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.
[68] Joost Zwarts,et al. Conflicts in Interpretation , 2010 .
[69] Ellen Francik. Referential choice and focus of attention in narratives , 1985 .
[70] J.E.P.T. Schlichting,et al. Schlichting test voor taalproduktie. , 1995 .
[71] Carey K. Morewedge,et al. Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction , 2004 .
[72] C. Fisher,et al. Discourse prominence effects on 2.5-year-old children's interpretation of pronouns. , 2007, Lingua. International review of general linguistics. Revue internationale de linguistique generale.
[73] J. Stevens,et al. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1993 .
[74] Jeanette K. Gundel,et al. Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993 .