Referential choice across the lifespan: why children and elderly adults produce ambiguous pronouns

In this study, children, young adults and elderly adults were tested in production and comprehension tasks assessing referential choice. Our aims were (1) to determine whether speakers egocentrically base their referential choice on the preceding linguistic discourse or also take into account the perspective of a hypothetical listener and (2) whether the possible impact of perspective taking on referential choice changes with increasing age, with its associated changes in cognitive capacity. In the production task, participants described picture-based stories featuring two characters of the same gender, making it necessary to use unambiguous forms; in the comprehension task, participants interpreted potentially ambiguous pronouns at the end of similar orally presented stories. Young adults (aged 18–35) were highly sensitive to the informational needs of hypothetical conversational partners in their production and comprehension of referring expressions. In contrast, children (aged 4–7) did not take into account possible conversational partners and tended to use pronouns for all given referents, leading to the production of ambiguous pronouns that are unrecoverable for a listener. This was mirrored in the outcome of the comprehension task, where children were insensitive to the shift of discourse topic marked by the speaker. The elderly adults (aged 69–87) behaved differently from both young adults and children. They showed a clear sensitivity to the other person's perspective in both production and comprehension, but appeared to lack the necessary cognitive capacities to keep track of the prominence of discourse referents, producing more potentially ambiguous pronouns than young adults, though fewer than children. In conclusion then, referential choice seems to depend on perspective taking in language, which develops with increasing linguistic experience and cognitive capacity, but also on the ability to keep track of the prominence of discourse referents, which is gradually lost with older age.

[1]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Pronoun co-referencing errors: Challenges for generativist and usage-based accounts , 2009 .

[2]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Reference production in young speakers with and without autism: Effects of discourse status and processing constraints , 2009, Cognition.

[3]  P Brooks,et al.  Factors affecting young children's use of pronouns as referring expressions. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[4]  N. Epley,et al.  Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention , 2010 .

[5]  Annette Karmiloff-Smith,et al.  Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective , 1985 .

[6]  M. Hickmann,et al.  Cohesion and anaphora in children's narratives: a comparison of English, French, German, and Mandarin Chinese , 1999, Journal of Child Language.

[7]  Boaz Keysar,et al.  Less Is More: A Minimalist Account of Joint Action in Communication , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[9]  Kersti Börjars,et al.  Non-Transformational Syntax: Formal and Explicit Models of Grammar , 2011 .

[10]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.

[11]  Jennifer Spenader,et al.  Coherent discourse solves the pronoun interpretation problem* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.

[12]  Mira Ariel Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents , 1990 .

[13]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Knowledge and Obedience: The Developmental Status of the Binding Theory , 1990 .

[14]  Janet L. Capps,et al.  Comprehension of pronouns in young and older adults. , 1986 .

[15]  M. Walker,et al.  Centering Theory in Discourse , 1998 .

[16]  E. Prince The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-status , 1992 .

[17]  P. Hendriks,et al.  When Production Precedes Comprehension: An Optimization Approach to the Acquisition of Pronouns , 2006 .

[18]  Chien Yu-Chin,et al.  Children's Knowledge of Locality Conditions in Binding as Evidence for the Modularity of Syntax and Pragmatics , 1990 .

[19]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking , 2000, Cognition.

[20]  Jane Grimsahw Knwoledge and obedience: the developmental status of the binding theory , 1990 .

[21]  Carl Pollard,et al.  A Centering Approach to Pronouns , 1987, ACL.

[22]  F. Craik,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition , 1992 .

[23]  Michael W. Pratt,et al.  Telling tales: Aging, working memory, and the narrative cohesion of story retellings. , 1989 .

[24]  Cornelia Hamann,et al.  Production-Comprehension Asymmetries in Child Language , 2011 .

[25]  G. Dell,et al.  Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  Learning to reason about speakers' alternatives in sentence comprehension: A computational account , 2007 .

[27]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  Comprehension and production of subject pronouns : Evidence for the asymmetry of grammar , 2005 .

[28]  Helen de Hoop,et al.  Children's Optimal Interpretations of Indefinite Subjects and Objects , 2006 .

[29]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  Age Differences in Adults’ Use of Referring Expressions , 2008, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[30]  Reinhard Blutner,et al.  Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation , 2000, J. Semant..

[31]  Edward Gibson,et al.  The Processing and Acquisition of Reference , 2011 .

[32]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Why Do Alzheimer Patients Have Difficulty with Pronouns? Working Memory, Semantics, and Reference in Comprehension and Production in Alzheimer's Disease , 1999, Brain and Language.

[33]  Jennifer E. Arnold RUNNING HEAD : AVOIDING ATTACHMENT AMBIGUITIES Avoiding Attachment Ambiguities : the Role of Constituent Ordering , 2004 .

[34]  Michael P. Cannito,et al.  Disruption of reference in aging , 1986, Brain and Language.

[35]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  Investigating the Interpretation of Pronouns and Demonstratives in Finnish , 2011 .

[36]  D. B. Mitchell,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition , 2001 .

[37]  S. Thompson,et al.  Discourse description : diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text , 1992 .

[38]  A Wingfield,et al.  Speech-processing capacity in young and older adults: a dual-task study. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[39]  Jill de Villiers,et al.  Asymmetries in the acquisition of definite and indefinite NPs , 2010 .

[40]  C. Fisher,et al.  Who’s “she”? Discourse prominence influences preschoolers’ comprehension of pronouns☆ , 2005 .

[41]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .

[42]  Lori E. James,et al.  Theoretical approaches to language and aging. , 2000 .

[43]  R. Gonzalez Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 2003 .

[44]  Optimal communication (paperback edition) , 2006 .

[45]  Sergio Carlomagno,et al.  Age-related Differences in the Production of Textual Descriptions , 2005, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[46]  K. Ehrlich,et al.  Comprehension of Pronouns , 1980 .

[47]  Jacolien van Rij,et al.  WM Load Influences the Interpretation of Referring Expressions , 2011, CMCL@ACL.

[48]  W. Chafe Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .

[49]  Thomas Wasow,et al.  Performance‐Compatible Competence Grammar , 2011 .

[50]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  Cognitive architectures and language acquisition: a case study in pronoun comprehension. , 2010, Journal of child language.

[51]  S. Morris,et al.  OPTIMAL COMMUNICATION , 2005 .

[52]  B. Keysar,et al.  When do speakers take into account common ground? , 1996, Cognition.

[53]  D. Barr Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground , 2008, Cognition.

[54]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[55]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Young children's sensitivity to listener knowledge and perceptual context in choosing referring expressions , 2005, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[56]  Mathias Beike,et al.  Errors In Anaphora Acquisition , 2016 .

[57]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[58]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  Production/comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition , 2010 .

[59]  Jennifer E. Arnold Reference form and discourse patterns , 1998 .

[60]  ● Pytorch,et al.  Attention! , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  Gillian Cohen,et al.  Language comprehension in old age , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[62]  Cécile De Cat,et al.  Information tracking and encoding in early L1: linguistic competence vs. cognitive limitations* , 2011, Journal of Child Language.

[63]  T. Givón Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction , 1983 .

[64]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes , 2008 .

[65]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. , 1966 .

[66]  P. Smolensky On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language , 1996 .

[67]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[68]  Joost Zwarts,et al.  Conflicts in Interpretation , 2010 .

[69]  Ellen Francik Referential choice and focus of attention in narratives , 1985 .

[70]  J.E.P.T. Schlichting,et al.  Schlichting test voor taalproduktie. , 1995 .

[71]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction , 2004 .

[72]  C. Fisher,et al.  Discourse prominence effects on 2.5-year-old children's interpretation of pronouns. , 2007, Lingua. International review of general linguistics. Revue internationale de linguistique generale.

[73]  J. Stevens,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1993 .

[74]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993 .