论文信息 - Rational risk/benefit decisions in the use of flame retardants: an analytical approach

Rational risk/benefit decisions in the use of flame retardants: an analytical approach

Difficult trade-offs must be made in setting regulatory policy on the use of flame retardant chemicals. A rational policy is one that seeks a moderate middle ground, trading off toxic hazards against fire hazards to yield the minimum aggregated losses and costs to society.

Stanley B. Martin | Fred L. Offensend

[1] W. T. Ham,et al. Factors significantly affecting mortality in the burned patient. , 1965, The Journal of trauma.

[2] M. Prival,et al. Tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate: mutagenicity of a widely used flame retardant. , 1977, Science.

[3] K. Kaiser. Mirex: An Unrecognized Contaminant of Fishes from Lake Ontario , 1974, Science.

[4] B. Ames,et al. Flame-retardant additives as possible cancer hazards , 1977 .

[5] J. Casida,et al. Bicyclic Phosphorus Esters: High Toxicity without Cholinesterase Inhibition , 1973, Science.