Identification and separation of rigid image registration error sources, demonstrated for MRI-only image guided radiotherapy

PURPOSE Rigid image registration (RIR) accuracy is crucial for image guided radiotherapy (IGRT). However, existing clinical image registration assessment methods cannot separate and quantify RIR error sources. Herein, we develop an extension of the 'full circle method' for RIR consistency. Paired registration circuits are used to isolate sources of RIR error caused by reference dataset substitution, from those inherent to the underlying RIR. This approach was demonstrated in the context of MRI-only IGRT, assessing substitution of MRI-derived synthetic-CT (sCT) for conventional CT, in a cohort of rectal cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Planning CT, MRI-derived sCT, and two CBCTs from seven rectal cancer patients were retrospectively registered with global and soft tissue clipbox based RIR. Paired registration circuits were constructed using two moving (cone beam CT) images and two reference images (CT and sCT), per patient. Differences between inconsistencies in registration circuits containing CT and sCT were used to determine changes in registration accuracy due to substitution of sCT for CT. RESULTS sCT was found to be equivalent to CT under global RIR, with median differences of 0.05 mm and 0.01°. Soft tissue clipbox based RIR with sCT exhibited gross misregistration (>5 mm or 3°) for 3 patients. Registration consistency was degraded compared to CT across the cohort, with median differences of 0.54 mm and 0.15°. CONCLUSION A paired registration circuit methodology for assessing RIR accuracy without ground truth information was developed and demonstrated for MRI-only IGRT in rectal cancer. This highlighted a reduction in clipbox based RIR consistency when sCT was substituted for conventional CT. The developed method enabled separation of degraded registration accuracy, from other error sources within the overall registration inconsistency. This novel methodology is applicable to any RIR scenario and enables analysis of the change in RIR performance on modification of image data or process.

[1]  T Haycocks,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the radiation treatment planning of localized prostate cancer using intra-prostatic fiducial markers for computed tomography co-registration. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  Josef A. Lundman,et al.  Quantifying the Effect of 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Residual System Distortions and Patient-Induced Susceptibility Distortions on Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning for Prostate Cancer. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  L. Holloway,et al.  Comparison of automatic image registration uncertainty for three IGRT systems using a male pelvis phantom , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[4]  Fredrik Nordström,et al.  Technical Note: MRI only prostate radiotherapy planning using the statistical decomposition algorithm. , 2015, Medical physics.

[5]  J. Sonke,et al.  Feasibility of MRI-based reference images for image-guided radiotherapy of the pelvis with either cone-beam computed tomography or planar localization images , 2015, Acta oncologica.

[6]  J Pukala,et al.  A GPU based high-resolution multilevel biomechanical head and neck model for validating deformable image registration. , 2014, Medical physics.

[7]  Stina Svensson,et al.  The ANACONDA algorithm for deformable image registration in radiotherapy. , 2014, Medical physics.

[8]  Fredrik Nordström,et al.  MR-OPERA: A Multicenter/Multivendor Validation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Prostate Treatment Planning Using Synthetic Computed Tomography Images. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Michael G Herman,et al.  Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and electronic portal imaging. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  K. Brock,et al.  Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 132 , 2017, Medical physics.

[11]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Influence of the number of elongated fiducial markers on the localization accuracy of the prostate , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Peter R. Seevinck,et al.  Evaluation of gold fiducial marker manual localisation for magnetic resonance-only prostate radiotherapy , 2018, Radiation oncology.

[13]  J C de Munck,et al.  Automatic registration of pelvic computed tomography data and magnetic resonance scans including a full circle method for quantitative accuracy evaluation. , 1998, Medical physics.

[14]  Richard Speight,et al.  Automated, reference-free local error assessment of multimodal deformable image registration for radiotherapy in the head and neck. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  J J W Lagendijk,et al.  Assessment of rigid multi-modality image registration consistency using the multiple sub-volume registration (MSR) method. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Phantom based evaluation of CT to CBCT image registration for proton therapy dose recalculation , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  H. Huisman,et al.  Clinical validation of the normalized mutual information method for registration of CT and MR images in radiotherapy of brain tumors , 2004, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[18]  W Birkfellner,et al.  Automatic quantification of multi-modal rigid registration accuracy using feature detectors. , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  L G W Kerkmeijer,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging only Workflow for Radiotherapy Simulation and Planning in Prostate Cancer. , 2018, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).