Language performance and auditory evoked fields in 2‐ to 5‐year‐old children

Language development progresses at a dramatic rate in preschool children. As rapid temporal processing of speech signals is important in daily colloquial environments, we performed magnetoencephalography (MEG) to investigate the linkage between speech‐evoked responses during rapid‐rate stimulus presentation (interstimulus interval < 1 s) and language performance in 2‐ to 5‐year‐old children (n = 59). Our results indicated that syllables with this short stimulus interval evoked detectable P50m, but not N100m, in most participants, indicating a marked influence of longer neuronal refractory period for stimulation. The results of equivalent dipole estimation showed that the intensity of the P50m component in the left hemisphere was positively correlated with language performance (conceptual inference ability). The observed positive correlations were suggested to reflect the maturation of synaptic organisation or axonal maturation and myelination underlying the acquisition of linguistic abilities. The present study is among the first to use MEG to study brain maturation pertaining to language abilities in preschool children.

[1]  D. Pandya,et al.  Corticostriatal connections of the superior temporal region in rhesus monkeys , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  Shigeaki Amano,et al.  Speech overlap in Japanese mother-child conversations. , 2004, Journal of child language.

[3]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[4]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[5]  M. Kiefer,et al.  The Sound of Concepts: Four Markers for a Link between Auditory and Conceptual Brain Systems , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  S. Cappa,et al.  Conceptual knowledge in the brain: fMRI evidence for a featural organization , 2008, Brain Research.

[7]  M Reite,et al.  Source location of a 50 msec latency auditory evoked field component. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  J. E. Hind,et al.  Auditory cortex on the human posterior superior temporal gyrus , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  M. Le Normand.  A developmental exploration of language used to accompany symbolic play in young, normal children (2-4 years old). , 1986, Child: care, health and development.

[10]  E. Sussman,et al.  The development of the length of the temporal window of integration for rapidly presented auditory information as indexed by MMN , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  O. Salonen,et al.  Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields to Tones and Pseudowords in Healthy Children and Adults , 1995, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[12]  J. Obleser,et al.  Auditory evoked fields differentially encode speech features: an MEG investigation of the P50m and N100m time courses during syllable processing , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  David Poeppel,et al.  Auditory M50 and M100 responses to broadband noise: functional implications , 2004, Neuroreport.

[14]  J. Eggermont,et al.  Maturation of the Mismatch Negativity: Effects of Profound Deafness and Cochlear Implant Use , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[15]  Jean K. Moore,et al.  Cytoarchitectural and Axonal Maturation in Human Auditory Cortex , 2001, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[16]  D. Pandya,et al.  Post‐rolandic cortical projections of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  A. Friederici.  Neurophysiological markers of early language acquisition: from syllables to sentences , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Todd Squires,et al.  A discourse analysis of the Japanese particle sa , 1994 .

[19]  J. Mäkelä,et al.  Cortical origin of middle-latency auditory evoked responses in man , 1987, Neuroscience Letters.

[20]  C. Elberling,et al.  Auditory magnetic fields from the human cerebral cortex: Location and strength of an equivalent current dipole , 1982, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[21]  J. Eggermont,et al.  Maturation of human central auditory system activity: separating auditory evoked potentials by dipole source modeling , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  D. Pandya,et al.  Intrinsic connections and architectonics of posterior parietal cortex in the rhesus monkey , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[23]  T. Yoshiura,et al.  Source localization of middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields , 1995, Brain Research.

[24]  K. Uutela,et al.  Detecting and Correcting for Head Movements in Neuromagnetic Measurements , 2001, NeuroImage.

[25]  R. Reale,et al.  Functional connections between auditory cortex on Heschl's gyrus and on the lateral superior temporal gyrus in humans. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Neural responses to uninterrupted natural speech can be extracted with precise temporal resolution , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  Christopher K. Kovach,et al.  A functional connection between inferior frontal gyrus and orofacial motor cortex in human. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  D. Pandya,et al.  Comparative cytoarchitectonic analysis of the human and the macaque ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and corticocortical connection patterns in the monkey , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  K Mathiak,et al.  Differential impact of periodic and aperiodic speech‐like acoustic signals on magnetic M50/M100 fields , 2000, Neuroreport.

[30]  P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[31]  J. Mäkelä,et al.  Whole-head mapping of middle-latency auditory evoked magnetic fields. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  W. Roberts,et al.  Prominence of M50 auditory evoked response over M100 in childhood and autism , 2004, Neuroreport.

[33]  J R Anderson,et al.  Retrieval of information from long-term memory. , 1983, Science.

[34]  Minna Huotilainen,et al.  Using magnetoencephalography in assessing auditory skills in infants and children. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[35]  A. Salamy,et al.  Commissural transmission: maturational changes in humans. , 1978, Science.

[36]  Alfred Anwander,et al.  Neuroanatomical prerequisites for language functions in the maturing brain. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Interpreting abnormality: an EEG and MEG study of P50 and the auditory paired-stimulus paradigm , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[38]  B. Dodd,et al.  Phonological awareness skills of 4-year-old British children: an assessment and developmental data. , 1999, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[39]  T. Onitsuka,et al.  The effect of interstimulus intervals and between-block rests on the auditory evoked potential and magnetic field: is the auditory P50 in humans an overlapping potential? , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[40]  Blake W. Johnson,et al.  Measurement of brain function in pre-school children using a custom sized whole-head MEG sensor array , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  Roy D Patterson,et al.  Functional imaging of the auditory processing applied to speech sounds , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Kuniyoshi L Sakai,et al.  Language Acquisition and Brain Development , 2005, Science.

[43]  P. Teale,et al.  Developmental changes in refractoriness of the neuromagnetic M100 in children , 1998, Neuroreport.

[44]  M. Dorman,et al.  Developmental changes in refractoriness of the cortical auditory evoked potential , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[45]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Group intervention changes brain activity in bilingual language-impaired children. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.