Imaging Phenology; Scaling From Camera Plots to Landscapes

Abstract Information on the spatial and temporal patterns of plant phenology is important to develop a more comprehensive understanding of food availability and habitat for many animal species. The combination of broad scale, regional climatic, and more localized, site-level drivers presents a challenge when upscaling phenology from the plot to the region. Likewise, developing relationships between ground- or camera-based estimates and satellite imagery remains difficult due to the trade-off between temporal and spatial resolution. Landsat imagery, with its 16 day temporal resolution, is often thought of as being insufficient for timely observation of changes in vegetation throughout the year. However the free availability of the Landsat archive has enabled a major shift in the way Landsat imagery is processed moving towards pixel, rather than scene, based analyses. In this paper we build on previous research by examining the applicability and accuracy of Landsat derived phenology curves beyond deciduous stands into more mixed stands and conifer dominated forest types in the Rocky Mountains and foothills in Alberta, Canada. In addition, we discuss the application of these Landsat phenology curves to phenology of understorey species which are linked to habitat selection for free roaming wildlife, in particular grizzly bears. The agreement between Landsat- and camera-derived estimates of key phenological events was stronger for green-up (RMSE = 7 days) than for senescence (RMSE = 14 days). Our results show that yearly adjustment of green-up and senescence dates using available Landsat observations improved the agreement with camera-derived estimates when compared to average annual curves. Seasonal phenology transition dates accepted as valid ranged from 25% for alpine herbaceous pixels to 75% for closed deciduous, demonstrating the variable success of this approach across land cover types. Season transition dates were rejected if pixels lacked a strong enough green-up signal in Landsat spectral indices or if the estimated dates fell outside of the valid range. We conclude by investigating the spatial patterns of seasonal phenology at the Landsat scale, and assess the relative importance of regional vs. microsite conditions as well as the utility of these data for resource and wildlife management.

[1]  Marcel E Visser,et al.  Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Public Internet‐connected cameras used as a cross‐continental ground‐based plant phenology monitoring system , 2010 .

[3]  Paul D. Pickell,et al.  Monitoring anthropogenic disturbance trends in an industrialized boreal forest with Landsat time series , 2014 .

[4]  N. Coops,et al.  Monitoring plant condition and phenology using infrared sensitive consumer grade digital cameras , 2014 .

[5]  C. D. Keeling,et al.  Increased activity of northern vegetation inferred from atmospheric CO2 measurements , 1996, Nature.

[6]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Development and testing of phenologically driven grizzly bear habitat models , 2003 .

[7]  C. Appenzeller,et al.  A comparative study of satellite and ground-based phenology , 2007, International journal of biometeorology.

[8]  Alberta.,et al.  Status of the Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos) in Alberta , 2010 .

[9]  P. Hostert,et al.  Forest disturbances, forest recovery, and changes in forest types across the Carpathian ecoregion from 1985 to 2010 based on Landsat image composites , 2014 .

[10]  A. Strahler,et al.  Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS , 2003 .

[11]  J. Pal,et al.  On the role of resolution and topography in the simulation of East Asia precipitation , 2006 .

[12]  Zhe Zhu,et al.  Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery , 2012 .

[13]  Erwin Ulrich,et al.  Evaluation of the onset of green-up in temperate deciduous broadleaf forests derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data , 2008 .

[14]  A. Huete,et al.  Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices , 2002 .

[15]  Liang Liang,et al.  Landscape phenology: an integrative approach to seasonal vegetation dynamics , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[16]  G. McDermid,et al.  Dynamic wildlife habitat models: Seasonal foods and mortality risk predict occupancy-abundance and habitat selection in grizzly bears , 2010 .

[17]  Michael Hamilton,et al.  Use of a Networked Digital Camera to Estimate Net CO2 Uptake of a Desiccation‐Tolerant Moss , 2006, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[18]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF A CAMERA NETWORK ACROSS AN ELEVATION GRADIENT FOR HABITAT ASSESSMENT , 2011 .

[19]  G. Meyer,et al.  Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue, and lighting conditions , 1994 .

[20]  Liang Liang,et al.  Photographic assessment of temperate forest understory phenology in relation to springtime meteorological drivers , 2012, International Journal of Biometeorology.

[21]  M. Rossini,et al.  Using digital camera images to analyse snowmelt and phenology of a subalpine grassland , 2014 .

[22]  J. Mustard,et al.  Green leaf phenology at Landsat resolution: Scaling from the field to the satellite , 2006 .

[23]  M. D. Schwartz.  Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science , 2003, Tasks for Vegetation Science.

[24]  C. Justice,et al.  Atmospheric correction of visible to middle-infrared EOS-MODIS data over land surfaces: Background, operational algorithm and validation , 1997 .

[25]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Integrating optical satellite data and airborne laser scanning in habitat classification for wildlife management , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[26]  Thomas R. Loveland,et al.  A review of large area monitoring of land cover change using Landsat data , 2012 .

[27]  Thomas Hilker,et al.  Using digital time-lapse cameras to monitor species-specific understorey and overstorey phenology in support of wildlife habitat assessment , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[28]  A. Menzel,et al.  Trends in phenological phases in Europe between 1951 and 1996 , 2000, International journal of biometeorology.

[29]  J. Schaber,et al.  Responses of spring phenology to climate change , 2004 .

[30]  C. Tucker,et al.  Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991 , 1997, Nature.

[31]  W. Cohen,et al.  North American forest disturbance mapped from a decadal Landsat record , 2008 .

[32]  A. Huete,et al.  A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS , 1997 .

[33]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Opening the archive: How free data has enabled the science and monitoring promise of Landsat , 2012 .

[34]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  MODIS enhanced vegetation index predicts tree species richness across forested ecoregions in the contiguous U.S.A , 2006 .

[35]  H. Mooney,et al.  Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[36]  S. Uemura.  Patterns of leaf phenology in forest understory , 1994 .

[37]  M. Wulder,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Field of View on Monitoring Understory and Overstory Phenology Using Digital Repeat Photography , 2014 .

[38]  Mark D. Schwartz,et al.  Assessing satellite‐derived start‐of‐season measures in the conterminous USA , 2002 .

[39]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Vegetation phenology can be captured with digital repeat photography and linked to variability of root nutrition in Hedysarum alpinum , 2013 .

[40]  N. Battey,et al.  Temperate flowering phenology. , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[41]  D. Hamer,et al.  Grizzly Bear Food and Habitat in the Front Ranges of Banff National Park, Alberta , 1987 .

[42]  D. Roy,et al.  Web-enabled Landsat Data (WELD): Landsat ETM+ composited mosaics of the conterminous United States , 2010 .

[43]  S. Goward,et al.  An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks , 2010 .

[44]  Mark A. Friedl,et al.  Linking near-surface and satellite remote sensing measurements of deciduous broadleaf forest phenology , 2012 .

[45]  Thomas Hilker,et al.  Linking ground-based to satellite-derived phenological metrics in support of habitat assessment , 2012 .

[46]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  SEASONAL AND DIEL PATTERNS OF GRIZZLY BEAR DIET AND ACTIVITY IN WEST-CENTRAL ALBERTA , 2006 .

[47]  S. Côté,et al.  Impacts of climate change on the seasonal distribution of migratory caribou , 2009 .

[48]  Reiko Ide,et al.  Use of digital cameras for phenological observations , 2010, Ecol. Informatics.

[49]  M. Friedl,et al.  Detecting interannual variation in deciduous broadleaf forest phenology using Landsat TM/ETM+ data , 2013 .

[50]  Andrew D Richardson,et al.  Near-surface remote sensing of spatial and temporal variation in canopy phenology. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[51]  John F. Mustard,et al.  Phenology model from surface meteorology does not capture satellite‐based greenup estimations , 2007 .

[52]  J. Mustard,et al.  Cross-scalar satellite phenology from ground, Landsat, and MODIS data , 2007 .