Reciprocal Sign Epistasis between Frequently Experimentally Evolved Adaptive Mutations Causes a Rugged Fitness Landscape

The fitness landscape captures the relationship between genotype and evolutionary fitness and is a pervasive metaphor used to describe the possible evolutionary trajectories of adaptation. However, little is known about the actual shape of fitness landscapes, including whether valleys of low fitness create local fitness optima, acting as barriers to adaptive change. Here we provide evidence of a rugged molecular fitness landscape arising during an evolution experiment in an asexual population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We identify the mutations that arose during the evolution using whole-genome sequencing and use competitive fitness assays to describe the mutations individually responsible for adaptation. In addition, we find that a fitness valley between two adaptive mutations in the genes MTH1 and HXT6/HXT7 is caused by reciprocal sign epistasis, where the fitness cost of the double mutant prohibits the two mutations from being selected in the same genetic background. The constraint enforced by reciprocal sign epistasis causes the mutations to remain mutually exclusive during the experiment, even though adaptive mutations in these two genes occur several times in independent lineages during the experiment. Our results show that epistasis plays a key role during adaptation and that inter-genic interactions can act as barriers between adaptive solutions. These results also provide a new interpretation on the classic Dobzhansky-Muller model of reproductive isolation and display some surprising parallels with mutations in genes often associated with tumors.

[1]  Frank Speleman,et al.  Real-time quantitative PCR as an alternative to Southern blot or fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of gene copy number changes. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.

[2]  C. Pigott Genetics and the Origin of Species , 1959, Nature.

[3]  M. Wade,et al.  Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process , 2000 .

[4]  N. Barton,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: A CRITIQUE OF SEWALL WRIGHT'S SHIFTING BALANCE THEORY OF EVOLUTION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  E. Ortlund,et al.  Crystal Structure of an Ancient Protein: Evolution by Conformational Epistasis , 2007, Science.

[6]  M. Whitlock,et al.  MULTIPLE FITNESS PEAKS AND EPISTASIS , 1995 .

[7]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  Estimating the Per-Base-Pair Mutation Rate in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Genetics.

[8]  D. J. Kiviet,et al.  Reciprocal sign epistasis is a necessary condition for multi-peaked fitness landscapes. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  Fred Winston,et al.  Construction of a set of convenient saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C , 1995, Yeast.

[10]  R. Lenski,et al.  Microbial genetics: Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  Sergey Gavrilets,et al.  A Dynamical Theory of Speciation on Holey Adaptive Landscapes , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[12]  S. Wright Surfaces of Selective Value Revisited , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Nigel F. Delaney,et al.  Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter Proteins , 2006, Science.

[14]  L. Hurst Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process , 2000, Heredity.

[15]  J. Jauniaux,et al.  Mth1 receives the signal given by the glucose sensors Snf3 and Rgt2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae ‡ , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[16]  A. Dean,et al.  Pervasive Cryptic Epistasis in Molecular Evolution , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[17]  Leopold Parts,et al.  Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts , 2008 .

[18]  Gavin Sherlock,et al.  Bulk Segregant Analysis by High-Throughput Sequencing Reveals a Novel Xylose Utilization Gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[19]  Frank J. Poelwijk,et al.  Evolutionary Potential of a Duplicated Repressor-Operator Pair: Simulating Pathways Using Mutation Data , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  R. H.J.MULLE THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE , 2002 .

[21]  Fyodor A. Kondrashov,et al.  Sequence space and the ongoing expansion of the protein universe , 2010, Nature.

[22]  Thomas J Hudson,et al.  Survey of allelic expression using EST mining. , 2005, Genome research.

[23]  Jeffrey E. Barrick,et al.  Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli , 2009, Nature.

[24]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Why sex and recombination? , 1998, Science.

[25]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Cancer genes and the pathways they control , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[26]  C. Brown,et al.  Multiple duplications of yeast hexose transport genes in response to selection in a glucose-limited environment. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[27]  Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..

[28]  R. Watson,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: SIGN EPISTASIS AND GENETIC COSTRAINT ON EVOLUTIONARY TRAJECTORIES , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  N. Barton Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species , 2004 .

[30]  A. Sousa,et al.  Positive Epistasis Drives the Acquisition of Multidrug Resistance , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[31]  J. Krug,et al.  Exploring the Effect of Sex on Empirical Fitness Landscapes , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[32]  David Botstein,et al.  The Repertoire and Dynamics of Evolutionary Adaptations to Controlled Nutrient-Limited Environments in Yeast , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[33]  D. Presgraves,et al.  The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[34]  S. Gavrilets Evolution and speciation on holey adaptive landscapes. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  Gavin Sherlock,et al.  Molecular Characterization of Clonal Interference during Adaptive Evolution in Asexual Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[36]  R. Lenski,et al.  Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. XI. Rejection of non-transitive interactions as cause of declining rate of adaptation , 2002, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[37]  S. Elena,et al.  The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[38]  E. Coen,et al.  Evolutionary Paths Underlying Flower Color Variation in Antirrhinum , 2006, Science.

[39]  R. Lenski,et al.  Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli , 2008 .

[40]  David Botstein,et al.  GO: : TermFinder--open source software for accessing Gene Ontology information and finding significantly enriched Gene Ontology terms associated with a list of genes , 2004, Bioinform..

[41]  Stephen P. Miller,et al.  The Biochemical Architecture of an Ancient Adaptive Landscape , 2005, Science.

[42]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Glucose Deprivation Contributes to the Development of KRAS Pathway Mutations in Tumor Cells , 2009, Science.

[43]  Richard Durbin,et al.  Sequence analysis Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows – Wheeler transform , 2009 .

[44]  Thanat Chookajorn,et al.  Stepwise acquisition of pyrimethamine resistance in the malaria parasite , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  P. Phillips Epistasis — the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[46]  D. J. Kiviet,et al.  Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths , 2007, Nature.

[47]  M. Whitlock,et al.  VARIANCE‐INDUCED PEAK SHIFTS , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  Marcus W Feldman,et al.  The rate at which asexual populations cross fitness valleys. , 2009, Theoretical population biology.

[49]  Robert P. Davey,et al.  Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts , 2008, Nature.

[50]  James B. Anderson,et al.  Incipient speciation by divergent adaptation and antagonistic epistasis in yeast , 2007, Nature.

[51]  D. Thompson,et al.  Determinants of Divergent Adaptation and Dobzhansky-Muller Interaction in Experimental Yeast Populations , 2010, Current Biology.

[52]  H. Cordell Detecting gene–gene interactions that underlie human diseases , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.