Assessing statistical differences between parameters estimates in Partial Least Squares path modeling

Structural equation modeling using partial least squares (PLS-SEM) has become a main-stream modeling approach in various disciplines. Nevertheless, prior literature still lacks a practical guidance on how to properly test for differences between parameter estimates. Whereas existing techniques such as parametric and non-parametric approaches in PLS multi-group analysis solely allow to assess differences between parameters that are estimated for different subpopulations, the study at hand introduces a technique that allows to also assess whether two parameter estimates that are derived from the same sample are statistically different. To illustrate this advancement to PLS-SEM, we particularly refer to a reduced version of the well-established technology acceptance model.

[1]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 1998 .

[2]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Corrigendum to “Editorial Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance” [LRP 46/1-2 (2013) 1–12] , 2014 .

[3]  José L. Roldán,et al.  Prediction-oriented modeling in business research by means of PLS path modeling: Introduction to a JBR special section , 2016 .

[4]  R. Hubbard,et al.  Why P Values Are Not a Useful Measure of Evidence in Statistical Significance Testing , 2008 .

[5]  Hein Putter,et al.  The bootstrap: a tutorial , 2000 .

[6]  A. Gelman,et al.  The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is not Itself Statistically Significant , 2006 .

[7]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS , 2014 .

[8]  Manfred Schwaiger,et al.  Corporate reputation: disentangling the effects on financial performance , 2005 .

[9]  Andreas Eggert,et al.  Who owns the customer? Disentangling customer loyalty in indirect distribution channels , 2012 .

[10]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[12]  Justin H. Gross Testing What Matters (If You Must Test at All): A Context‐Driven Approach to Substantive and Statistical Significance , 2015 .

[13]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects , 2000, MIS Q..

[14]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2015, MIS Q..

[15]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  On the convergence of the partial least squares path modeling algorithm , 2010, Comput. Stat..

[16]  Peter Z. Schochet Guidelines for Multiple Testing in Impact Evaluations of Educational Interventions. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research , 2008 .

[17]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling , 2021, Handbook of Market Research.

[18]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[19]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[20]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[21]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations , 2014 .

[23]  W. Rice ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  Charles E. Lance,et al.  Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends : doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences , 2009 .

[25]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[26]  D. Sharpe Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research. , 2004 .

[27]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Editorial - Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance , 2013 .

[28]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Multigroup Analysis in Partial Least Squares (PLS) Path Modeling: Alternative Methods and Empirical Results , 2011 .

[29]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[30]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  Reflections on Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2014 .

[31]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  PLS-MGA: A Non-Parametric Approach to Partial Least Squares-based Multi-Group Analysis , 2010, GfKl.

[32]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Looking Back and Moving Forward , 2014 .

[33]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[34]  Herman Wold,et al.  Soft modelling: The Basic Design and Some Extensions , 1982 .

[35]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..