CityNet - Deep Learning Tools for Urban Ecoacoustic Assessment

Cities support unique and valuable ecological communities, but understanding urban wildlife is limited due to the difficulties of assessing biodiversity. Ecoacoustic surveying is a useful way of assessing habitats, where biotic sound measured from audio recordings is used as a proxy for biodiversity. However, existing algorithms for measuring biotic sound have been shown to be biased by non-biotic sounds in recordings, typical of urban environments. We develop CityNet, a deep learning system using convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to measure audible biotic (CityBioNet) and anthropogenic (CityAnthroNet) acoustic activity in cities. The CNNs were trained on a large dataset of annotated audio recordings collected across Greater London, UK. Using a held-out test dataset, we compare the precision and recall of CityBioNet and CityAnthroNet separately to the best available alternative algorithms: four acoustic indices (AIs): Acoustic Complexity Index, Acoustic Diversity Index, Bioacoustic Index, and Normalised Difference Soundscape Index, and a state-of-the-art bird call detection CNN (bulbul). We also compare the effect of non-biotic sounds on the predictions of CityBioNet and bulbul. Finally we apply CityNet to describe acoustic patterns of the urban soundscape in two sites along an urbanisation gradient. CityBioNet was the best performing algorithm for measuring biotic activity in terms of precision and recall, followed by bulbul, while the AIs performed worst. CityAnthroNet outperformed the Normalised Difference Soundscape Index, but by a smaller margin than CityBioNet achieved against the competing algorithms. The CityBioNet predictions were impacted by mechanical sounds, whereas air traffic and wind sounds influenced the bulbul predictions. Across an urbanisation gradient, we show that CityNet produced realistic daily patterns of biotic and anthropogenic acoustic activity from real-world urban audio data. Using CityNet, it is possible to automatically measure biotic and anthropogenic acoustic activity in cities from audio recordings. If embedded within an autonomous sensing system, CityNet could produce environmental data for cites at large-scales and facilitate investigation of the impacts of anthropogenic activities on wildlife. The algorithms, code and pre-trained models are made freely available in combination with two expert-annotated urban audio datasets to facilitate automated environmental surveillance in cities.

[1]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Challenges of Using Bioacoustics to Globally Monitor Bats , 2013 .

[2]  Paulo Farinha-Marques,et al.  Urban biodiversity: a review of current concepts and contributions to multidisciplinary approaches , 2011 .

[3]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Noisy matrix decomposition via convex relaxation: Optimal rates in high dimensions , 2011, ICML.

[4]  Honglak Lee,et al.  Unsupervised feature learning for audio classification using convolutional deep belief networks , 2009, NIPS.

[5]  Nadia Pieretti,et al.  Acoustic Indices for Biodiversity Assessment and Landscape Investigation , 2014 .

[6]  Christian Dietz,et al.  A continental-scale tool for acoustic identification of European bats , 2012 .

[7]  Colin Raffel,et al.  librosa: Audio and Music Signal Analysis in Python , 2015, SciPy.

[8]  Michael Towsey,et al.  A practical comparison of manual and autonomous methods for acoustic monitoring , 2013 .

[9]  Nadia Pieretti,et al.  Application of a recently introduced index for acoustic complexity to an avian soundscape with traffic noise. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Tzu-Hao Lin,et al.  Improving biodiversity assessment via unsupervised separation of biological sounds from long-duration recordings , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Almo Farina,et al.  A new methodology to infer the singing activity of an avian community: The Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI) , 2011 .

[12]  Eric P. Kasten,et al.  The remote environmental assessment laboratory's acoustic library: An archive for studying soundscape ecology , 2012, Ecol. Informatics.

[13]  Helena Titheridge,et al.  Biases of acoustic indices measuring biodiversity in urban areas , 2017 .

[14]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessments: Analyses of bias based on simulated bird assemblages and recommendations for field surveys , 2015 .

[15]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Ecological Indicators Monitoring Animal Diversity Using Acoustic Indices: Implementation in a Temperate Woodland , 2022 .

[16]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  SEEWAVE, A FREE MODULAR TOOL FOR SOUND ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS , 2008 .

[17]  E. D. Chesmore,et al.  Automated identification of field-recorded songs of four British grasshoppers using bioacoustic signal recognition , 2004, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[18]  Susanna Saari,et al.  Urban biodiversity: patterns and mechanisms , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Andrew L. Maas Rectifier Nonlinearities Improve Neural Network Acoustic Models , 2013 .

[20]  Paul Roe,et al.  The use of acoustic indices to determine avian species richness in audio-recordings of the environment , 2014, Ecol. Informatics.

[21]  Héctor Corrada Bravo,et al.  Automated classification of bird and amphibian calls using machine learning: A comparison of methods , 2009, Ecol. Informatics.

[22]  Almo Farina,et al.  Ecoacoustics: the Ecological Investigation and Interpretation of Environmental Sound , 2015, Biosemiotics.

[23]  Luis J. Villanueva-Rivera,et al.  Soundscape Ecology: The Science of Sound in the Landscape , 2011 .

[24]  Thomas Grill,et al.  Two convolutional neural networks for bird detection in audio signals , 2017, 2017 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[25]  Stuart H. Gage,et al.  Connecting soundscape to landscape: Which acoustic index best describes landscape configuration? , 2015 .

[26]  Damon M. Hall,et al.  The city as a refuge for insect pollinators , 2017, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[27]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[28]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[29]  Justin Salamon,et al.  Scaper: A library for soundscape synthesis and augmentation , 2017, 2017 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA).

[30]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Multi-trophic invasion resistance in Hawaii: bioacoustics, field surveys, and airborne remote sensing. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[31]  Justin Salamon,et al.  A Dataset and Taxonomy for Urban Sound Research , 2014, ACM Multimedia.

[32]  Bryan C. Pijanowski,et al.  A primer of acoustic analysis for landscape ecologists , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[33]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis , 1992 .

[34]  T. Mitchell Aide,et al.  Soundscape analysis and acoustic monitoring document impacts of natural gas exploration on biodiversity in a tropical forest , 2017 .

[35]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Acoustic identification of Mexican bats based on taxonomic and ecological constraints on call design , 2016 .

[36]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[37]  Michael Veith,et al.  Biodiversity in cities needs space: a meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[38]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  Internet of Things for Smart Cities , 2014, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[39]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.

[40]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[41]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic communication in the urban environment: patterns, mechanisms, and potential consequences of avian song adjustments , 2013 .

[42]  Hervé Glotin,et al.  Bird detection in audio: A survey and a challenge , 2016, 2016 IEEE 26th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP).

[43]  Lauren Pinault,et al.  Urban greenness and mortality in Canada's largest cities: a national cohort study. , 2017, The Lancet. Planetary health.