A novel surgical technique for obstructed megaureter: Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Dismembered Extravesical Cross-trigonal Ureteral Reimplantation (RADECUR) - Short-term assessment.

Purpose To describe our experience with robotic assisted laparoscopic dismembered extravesical cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation (RADECUR) - A novel minimally invasive surgical technique for treatment of obstructed megaureter. Materials and methods A retrospective review of our prospectively collected data, of all pediatric patients who underwent unilateral RADECUR for the treatment of primary or secondary obstructed megaureter at two medical centers during a three-year period. Patient demographics, perioperative data, surgical technique, complications and results are described. Results Thirty-five pediatric patients underwent RADECUR between January 2016- May 2019. Median age and weight at surgery were 28 months (IQR 20-58) and 20 kg (IQR 13-27) respectively. There were no conversions to an open procedure. Median console time was 100 minutes. (IQR 90-125) Ten patients underwent intracorporeal excisional tapering of the obstructed ureter. Mean pre and post-operative ureteral diameters were 14.5 mm (IQR 12-18) and 7 mm (IQR 0-10) respectively (p<0.0001). All but one patient demonstrated a reduction in hydronephrosis and ureteral diameter on follow-up ultrasound. Grade 1-2 Clavien-Dindo complications occurred in five patients (14%) and another patient developed a Grade 3 complication. Three patients developed post-operative febrile urinary tract infection, one of them was diagnosed with high grade reflux and subsequently underwent open ureteral reimplantation. Conclusions Unilateral robotic extravesical cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation for treatment of obstructed megaureter in the pediatric population is safe and effective. Further larger scale comparative studies to other surgical techniques are needed to determine the role of RADECUR in the armamentarium of treatment for distal ureteral obstruction.

[1]  B. Boillot,et al.  Endoscopic management of primary obstructive megaureter in pediatrics. , 2018, Journal of pediatric urology.

[2]  D. Chu,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral re-implant (RALUR): Can post-operative urinary retention be predicted? , 2018, Journal of pediatric urology.

[3]  B. Chertin,et al.  What are the predictive factors leading to ureteral obstruction following endoscopic correction of VUR in the pediatric population? , 2018, Journal of pediatric urology.

[4]  Yunus Kayalı,et al.  Comparison of intravesical (Cohen) and extravesical (Lich-Gregoir) ureteroneocystostomy in the treatment of unilateral primary vesicoureteric reflux in children. , 2017, Journal of pediatric urology.

[5]  F. Varlet,et al.  Laparoscopic-Assisted Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation and Extracorporeal Ureteral Tapering Repair for Primary Obstructive Megaureter in Children. , 2017, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[6]  F. Varlet,et al.  Laparoscopic vesico-ureteral reimplantation with Lich–Gregoir approach in children: medium term results of 159 renal units in 117 children , 2017, World Journal of Urology.

[7]  A. Kirsch,et al.  Recent Developments in the Use of Robotic Technology in Pediatric Urology , 2016, Expert review of medical devices.

[8]  S. Song,et al.  Current Status of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Pediatric Urology , 2014, Korean journal of urology.

[9]  P. Casale,et al.  Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology , 2014, Current Urology Reports.

[10]  T. Burki,et al.  British Association of Paediatric Urologists consensus statement on the management of the primary obstructive megaureter. , 2014, Journal of pediatric urology.

[11]  R. Rabinowitz,et al.  Does renal function remain stable after puberty in children with prenatal hydronephrosis and improved renal function after pyeloplasty? , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[12]  R. Rabinowitz,et al.  Long-term follow up of antenatally diagnosed megaureters. , 2008, Journal of Pediatric Urology.

[13]  P. Reddy,et al.  Results of tapered ureteral reimplantation for primary megaureter: extravesical versus intravesical approach. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[14]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[15]  R. Pfister,et al.  Primary megaureter in children and adults. Clinical and pathophysiologic features of 150 ureters. , 1978, Urology.

[16]  J. Caulk SURGERY OF THE ECTOPIC KIDNEY , 1923, Annals of surgery.